ghstofmaxwll

I said "incest with a consenting party", I thought it went without saying that this implies "all parties involved are over the age of consent", but I guess we cant all be quick.

Strangely, I've heard of arrest for bigamy, but not incest with a consenting party.

I didnt think incest was illegal, I've never know anyone to be nicked for it in Britain anyway.

[hide]queue.[/hide]

Was that from a cow? ...No seriously though, that is disturbing there are people out there who think the earth and moon is the universe.

I need that tattooed on a place that I always pay attention to.

Hmmmm. I think my post was supposed to some how sum up how retarded pretenders to science (A.K.A AGW asserters) are.

Maybe the reason you dont see the difference between the certainty of global warming assertions(based on scant data and interpretation) and the certainty of natural selection(based on copious and uncontested data) is because you are in fact the retard.

There is no confusion spastic! Your premise of a correlation between manmade greenhouse production and climate fluctuation is the simplest thing imaginable after learning Quantum mechanics and Trigonometric calculus. Its your faith induced assertions based on coincidence rather than strict science method that is where the doubt lies.

Just like a global warming enthusiast to miss the point..... Although its more likely than not you will not get attacked by a pit bull. Hospital figures show pit bull attacks are rising in Britain post "dangerous dog act".

How the hell do you guys get to write notations in your posts? Is it with latex?

No because f of x is the accepted modus operandi in maths. It wont help you to switch axis anyway, what will help you is listening to the people telling you about the zoom function and increment settings.

That was the very same robot costume? I didnt realize that.......It was of course the "Uncle Simon " episode, yeah? They used the toy model for "One for the angels"?....I have just about all the DVDs released of that show.

What??? Are you a complete idiot? Yo cant calculate error of 8degreesC and then conclude that the climate was less than 1degreeC hotter back then compared to now! Your main calculation has to be a larger figure than your combined error!!! You seriously need to learn some practical Physics skills before spewing nonsense claims. No I'm not be sarcastic, Im attempting to illustrate how stupid your type look to the real science community, inow and 1weedo are capitulating well as my lead stooges.

OK forget it! The chances of you fanatics actually interpreting the data right in the first place are so small that I dont think the concession is needed.

Indeed! Inow not understanding how much temperature will have surpassed well in excess of 1C fluctuations since 65E6 years ago, is its own rebuttal. Yes It will be fine! It will be fine for evolution! It will be fine for everyone but you guys who are ignorant to mass extinctions throughout transitions from and toward iceages and mini-iceages.

OK that is been out since Einstein found the revised explanation to Michelson-Morley. How did you bible guys latch onto it? and why adopt an outmoded concept when there are plenty of contemporary ones to corrupt into creationist teachings?

How in the hell do you assume such precision? 65E6 years back would require estimates of temperature through geological records! You guys remind me of the museum joke, with the 850,000,001 year old fossil on display. http://www.jokes.net/accountantvisitsthenaturalhistorymuseum.htm If you had any knowledge of evolutionary biology, you would know that mass extinctions followed by remain species diversifying in the left niches is all part of the process.

Jesus Christ man! 1 degree C???? If the mean temperature had remained within a degree over a 150 year period it would be a miracle if you take into account the erratic nature of solar surface activity along with one of the most complex climates in the solar system and substantial atmosphere( greenhouse gas rich). Thats not to mention accuracy and precision concerns in data, more so over a century ago. Where do you guys learn your Physics? Do you guys learn Physics? Where do you guys get taught systematic error, not to mention the random error ?

What do you mean by a frigging ether atmosphere? You will have to elaborate if you want people to take you seriously. ??Can someone else from the bible sector give us non bible jigglers an explanation of what you mean by ether?

Yes I know about wimps and machos, etc. I just dont know what you mean by "ether". Over here "Aether" is known as an out-dated explanation for Lorentz's measurements of space contraction.

What do you mean by the word "ether" here? Is that which we students from England know as Aether? Can you expand on what you mean? please.

There's no dilemma. Theres no black and white, but there's no dilemma....Err on the side of caution people.

On a side note, does the opening narration to Forbidden Planet chill other people? It does me. ...listen carefully to the very first line of the narration (where the seekbar is at the start of the red heart) and think about it! I cant see how this can fail to fill one with awe.

I doubt it because there is no purpose for that in maths. If you want to see that though just rotate your calculator 90degrees.