Jump to content

xxSilverPhinxx

Senior Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by xxSilverPhinxx

  1. I don't have anything useful to add here, but I just thought that I'd say that it was also my childhood dream to become a scientist (though that didn't work out). I guess firstly you should see some failures as an ok thing, if that's what's keeping you from achieving what you want. They can be made into other oportunities which you might find are not so bad at all.

     

    I think you should at least try and go for it, and don't worry so much about whether it's too late or not.

  2. SilverPhinxx,

     

    really good idea, I find the idea to use symbols for whole common words a good one, I'll take that over. And using its own symbols for double letters is a good one too.

     

    Because that is where they could start deciphering it, by the double letters and other common noticeable marks, it will also save me time writing. I also made the decision to not use any capitals, I think once I've developed my language it may be easier and faster to write than the real language.

     

    Exactly, a decoder will start testing out the simplest hypotheses, and letter substitution is one of them (especially if newspapers and puzzle pieces frequently publish them). You should aim to making it as simple for yourself as possible and at the same time as complex for them as possible. It's fairly easy to figure out some letters from common and easy words such as 'and' for instance, with 'an' and even 'a' being very common, so keep those sorts of things in mind. From there, whole words can be figured out and so more letters can be filled in. There shouldn't be any hints contained within what you've coded. In some cases people can see if a symbol is more likely to represent a vowel or consonant, and even if they get stuck, they might resort to trial and error. The double letter example for instance. It's way more likely that it would be a consonant. Or else 'ee' or 'oo'. All hints that should be avoided.

     

    You could look up various encryption methods and maybe even mix them, sort of like a double encryption. :D

     

    I think these sorts of things are fun. Let me know if I sound like I'm getting too carried away.:mellow:

  3. I found this explanation, hope it helps. I'm far from a biologist, so can't really help. But honestly, while it's commendable that you're trying to make a scientifically accurate film, keep in mind that science fiction films that break more physical laws than Lord Of The Rings (I'm looking at YOU, Armageddon) can be successful. ;)

     

     

     

    http://www.cliffsnot...cleId-7904.html

     

    Some other links that might help:

    http://www.diffen.co...ence/DNA_vs_RNA

    http://www.enotes.co...between-dna-rna

    http://www.newton.de...99/bio99410.htm

     

    Hey, LotR is a fantasy picture, so it's immune from any scientific criticisms! :P

  4. It's possible because of Einstein's Relativity to travel into the future. There are engineering impediments, however, because you would need to travel at very high speeds.

     

    I'm not too sure about going to the past, though. If it were possible based on creating wormholes, it would have to be seen if wormholes big and stable enough could even be created. Not to mention there are all those paradoxes which don't have clear answers such as how someone can go back into the past and alter causes of the universe of which they themselves are an effect.

  5. I think if you just do simple letter-to-symbol switches anybody can eventually decode what you've written if they've got a big enough sample. I think you should complicate things a bit more such as use just one symbol for common words such as "the", "and" etc. instead of a letter by letter substitution. And maybe a new whole symbol for commonly occurring couple of letters. For instance, in a word with double 't' such as 'letter', you could use just one symbol to mean 'tt' which would be different from two 't' symbols (which can actually facilitate any attempt to decode). Those sort of things will make your code more complex and throw people off track.

     

    I also think that using alphabet symbols of existing languages is also a good one, especially if one that's recognisable or looks enough like an existing alphabet. Better to have one with not that many speakers avaliable. People will suspect that it is another language and not just a cipher. They might not bother with it because they would assume that they would have to speak the language to make sense of it or find someone who does.

     

    Commit your symbols to memory, don't write them down, because once they're found...you've screwed up. ;)

  6. If I wanted to kill that thing I would shoot it with a BB gun from 10 feet away. No paper towel or shoe for that beast.

     

    Ha! My dad once shot a spider from the wall. What happened was he hit its leg and the spider when crawling under the bed, which of course, scared my mom (she doesn't like creatures with too many legs, and one less didn't seem to alleviate those fears) and it took forever to find the spider. I suggest there are better ways to remove them.

     

    But I think it it's not too poisonous, let it be. They can get rid of nasty little insects for you.

  7. I'm he (she?) could do both if they wanted. I have a friend who does personal training, teaches martial arts, goes to school, and plays in 3 bands. I couldn't imagine having his schedule but he enjoys it.

     

    :blink: I seriously didn't mean to write it that way, but meant to say "I don't see how you can't do both (even if not as much of the music as you might want). Mistake or major slip of the tongue? :unsure:

     

    I know there are people who are able to have a job and have plenty of time for their hobbies. I'm assuming that a better paying job (freelance) can give one more time in fact to pursue what they really like doing. I just think that the music profession isn't an easy one.

     

     

    ***

     

    If I were you, Yoseph, I would definitely take music up as a hobby but consider things lot more before making such a life changing decision.

  8. Ninjas are more stealthy, whereas Samurais are better in face to face battle. They (stereotypical or not) have different skills sets, so the outcome might depend more on the situational circumstance.

     

    I think the TV show "World's Deadliest Warrior" did an episode on this. You might be able to find it online.

  9. I think you could've maybe seen the sign unconsciously, sometimes we notice but don't see things.

     

    Also, have you counted the number of times you've said any other word that didn't coincide with something else?

  10. I think people experience various forms of disenfranchisement and they feel bitterness about it because they have the feeling that what happened to them was due to no fault of their own yet it didn't happen to others and those others expect them not to rain on their parade. Eventually, I think they begin to realize that they are better off for going through whatever it was they went through, and other people are more vulnerable for not having been through it yet. The irony is that once you've come to terms with the thing that caused your malevolence, you have a strong inner-peace that tends to bring out the malevolence in others. It's like their problems get amplified for them because they see that you've come to terms with yours. So it that sense, what goes around can come around.

     

    Good insight, I think.

  11. The infamous 'Thalidomidus rex,' I believe.

     

    I don't believe, I know!<_< Barney's come to town.

     

    Though seriously, if you want to see a dinosaur, all you have to do is go sight-seeing in the Letter's section of a university here...

  12. I don't see how you can do both (even if not as much of the music as you might want) and I'm going to echo what others have said about computer science probably being more financially stable.

  13. If you freeze it quickly before giving it time to die, it might become brittle. The ice crystals would break the cell structure from the inside when they expand.

  14. Time cannot run "backwards" but a set of equations can be time invarient.Surely there is a difference?

     

    This^ I think so too (layperson opinion, so maybe I'm confusing things here).

     

     

    Also, as for the reverse gravity example, isn't it looking a bit like the grandfather paradox? :blink: I'm assuming you're not talking about anti gravity here...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.