AtomicMX

Schrödinger , you should have heard about him in university... atomic wave equation... lamda... and stuff

Friedrich August Kekule

You ought to.

Well.. thats what i know... and its perfectly known as alchemy not chemistry as you said. and i choose that one, because there is your mistake. And you are saying that not knowing all is a mistake ( as far as i know means... all what i know) That you cant be cable to see your mistakes, well... its up to you. What i agree or not doesn't comes to scene, its all about what i say. you said this: So... you are saying that chemistry is not science.... Or tell me why is Phlogiston Theory a scientific debunked chemistry theory.. i am very cofused...( sarcasm)

Well... the difference is that you cannot in these days recallit as science.

Or you really think alchemy is actually a science (the debate i must remember you it was performed in the year 2004).

You wish. I say this because well, Sayonara seem to have a nice misunderstanding about what a science is, because in the debate i asked for "scientific debunked theories" as far as i know phlogiston theory was alchemy not chemistry.... what about that....

well i knew that for electromagnetism but the speed of light its a constant... how is it posible to get a formula out of it... .... can you explain that please

WTF! Wolframium and Tungsten are Filaments LOL! Lithium only Lintern

energy thinking in hrtz? and well.. then... how can the wavelength vary if they move at the same speed and go through the same space at same time.... (how could some paralels photons) have diferent wavelenghtd moving at same speed

I heard that a photon cannot be accelerated, but.. then what happens to the energy applied... does it turns back...or what... It is supposed that speed of light is a constant specified by photon.... but then again.... when the photos has its particle moment could it be acelerated... or is this the changes between particle and wave... an aceleration and desaceleration... And .... is the speed only messurable for matter?

"Scientific theories are built to be used, but they must be mistrusted, tested and improved" --Adam Frank, Astrophysicist study of quantity and qualities of observed events that maybe subject to testing without difference. This is quite a nice definition, but it takes in it all.... such like.. if i study the kinds of gods... it good be the gods science... and if i study the anything... it would be the science of anything... then you get that all studies are science... and if study = science then you have 2 perfectly equal concepts...there is the trick. But if you use the definition and steps of scientific method. then you have the difference... This is not an argument against you... is mostly... and adding to you all to reflex about it.

yet, was alchemy a science or not, the thing is that we must differenciate that perhaps socially was accepted as science, and was the basis for chemistry... but yet... it was not science. according to today. Is like a person that has been put into jail for murdering... in this time, the guy is a murderer... but... after some time we find that this guy isnt murderer at all, the murderer was another person identified by some DNA test or something.. then this guy is set to freedom... then this man.. in now days... should he be considered as muerderer? of course not... he is now non guilty from the evidence. and even if in those times he was considered as murderer he wasnt murderer at all... This is something for you all to reflex, specially Jakiri and Sayonara.

Nice article, but yet.. is it posible to create "new" species (mutated) by mixing genetic code.

Steal them?

Sure?

I do not consider alchemy a science, how about you all?

I agree with Cap'n Refsmmat, and he is talking about people with 5 or less posts... won't be a lost at all, and if he (the person) want to post in the future, then he might create another account... but well.. as in bussiness, the boss commands.

I am going to buy a M4 or a Beretta, so what?

About the researches that have been made how much can we manipulate the genetic code to construct things? such as a monkey of 3 arms, or genetic code mixing.. how much of this is posible. Can the genetic code of diferent kingdoms of life be mixed?

http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.beagle@mm.removal.tool.html Have a nice day

Where are talking about 3D.... i don't like geometry too much to care, but in my opinion.... as the 3D renderers work (most) i would think that way... like a circle has 1 side... an sphere are two circles intersected. i would determinate the numer of sides by the numer of interections of the circunferences if the horizontal and vertical circles... both spinning the 360 for each..... or something like that... but well... thinking of sides in 3D is kinda.... weird.. cause a side is made from a plane and well... in 3D a plane does not really exists cause it doesn't have Z. So... as there was said.. its matter of definition.

This topic is particullary difficult... but well... the highest temp. would be the point when the biggest atomic (talking about atomic number) you can make, has its electron spinning to the point that it will beat the bind with the nucleum (could we say the electron to the nucleum gravity) and well... there you have your highest temperature.

:S!!! How is that?

thats an intresting definition