thedarkshade

What you seem to understand about existence Eric is the philosophical point of view, but I have to mention that that particular point of view differs from the one we generally are aware of.

Hydrogen gas is just a physical form of hydrogen.

That would be an instinct I believe.

There isn't a strict one, but you got to be over 17 (I think) and play well. It is the way you play that is counted and the others are just a piece of cake.

It does not completely understand it, but our current understanding is enough to be able to 'manipulate with it'.

NONE! It's not man-made, it has existed long before men evolved and it definitely is not in a physical form.

They do actually, it's called "Which team do you belong?".

That is not what I am saying Eric, that is what you are saying. And if physics did COMPLETELY understand time, then we wouldn't really have any reason to confront about it since the confrontation would be avoided by facts.

In high school this term was used in our physics book, according to which we did all the stuff with electrostatics and electricity.

Does he get paid for that? I mean, I often write presentations for different students but I get money for that. I see no problem if things stand like this:D

Soccer Player! Really, I love it and I play good too.

Welcome to SFN... where the men are real men, the women are real women are where we always take our science seriously. <a statement by ecoli>

I feel at home here, really! And I DO have to mention that I once even saw a dream about it, Mokele, AP and IMM were back.

I know that you can buy it with a concentration 3-30%.

Gooood! And you must also mention that it is too corrosive.

No he got it right. A millionth of a millimeter([math]10^{-6}mm[/math]) is the same as a billionth of a meter ([math]10^{-9}m[/math]) and that is a nanometer.

In my place we use U for voltage. That's on the books we have. OK great, but like I said that is part of electrostatics which is indeed kinda in ideal cases. I'm deleting it BTW.

I don't think this really makes sense. Since by this you're using time to measure time.

I once heard a philosopher (don't remember who) saying that universe is nothing bur matter and curved space.

Yes indeed [math]U=IR[/math]

There is a difference between 'a definition' and 'an exact definition'. You can't have an exact definition of something that you don't exactly understand in the first place.

Beautiful said! Because the find the total resistance when resistors in the OP's case, you would do that by: [math]R=R_1 + R_2 + R_2[/math] which in a complicated way would look [math]IR= IR_1 + IR_2 + IR_3[/math] and since IR=U then: [math]U= U_1 + U_2 + U_2[/math] and this is what YT said:-).

OMG, that pic is 'paint made'!

By [math]R=\frac{U}{I}[/math] we can see that resistance drops with the drop of voltage and with the increase of intensity.

You don't add velocities like that in relativity. You do that by [math]V=\frac{v_1 + v_2}{1 + \frac{v_1v_2}{c^2}}[/math]