thedarkshade

By the equation that swansot has posted, you can clearly see that you get more amps by increasing the power (which I think means more rotations), or by decreasing the voltage since I is indirectly depended by V ([math]I=\frac{P}{V}[/math]).

I don't see any reason why wouldn't this work. But the best way would be to try it.

You're in the right place! I still am not the proper one for this but we got people that "ROCK" here, so it's just a matter of time. Good luck, Shade!

That would be tritium. These isotopes have multiple use, the links below contains detailed infos about the three http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen-1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium

Not as much as I expected, but I did get expelled though!

OK, thanks for the advice and I sure will check it out;)

Unfortunately that's true. I was trying to be fancy by building a sort of a bomb which resulted with great damage to our school's chemistry lab. Plus they found out that I was not authorized to enter alone in the lab. But the worst thing is that I even got a HazMat here at SFN for the same reason.

Depends from the battery, but the less the amperage, the more time you will need (iamo).

Yes indeed. Water Striders

That's called 'breaking the law' (illegal) and I suggest not to try that. It's not as fun as you might possibly think. I have experience on this, trust me.

Of course all are not rechargeable, but it takes nothing but reading to understand that!

You mean, the thought (hypothesis)!? Why do you keep saying that? I mean, you could say this because you like it ,but what basis back up this what you are saying? From this sentence I understand that first, there was time and then it came matter. This is our limit, but this does not send down the possibility of more dimensions. I don't understand what you mean by this:confused: You mean: c, the speed limit!

I used this method to charge my phone battery when my adapter got burnt, and it worked for me, so I see no reason why this couldn't possibly work, and yeah it might be a matter of time. But surely this could only apply to chargeable batteries. And do take care not to het burnt!

Unfortunately I think this is true!

Density is mas per unit of volume, and AFAIK there is a difference between mass and weight. Mass does not change, while weight does due to g. This is to imp BTW, I forgot to do the quoting thingy!

Potential difference is the same as voltage. You need to have a potential difference ([math]\Delta\phi[/math]) in order to have the flow of electricity. In electrostatics you might have had the chance to see [math]\phi=k\frac{q}{r}[/math] and [math]U=El[/math] and it's actually [math]\Delta\phi=U[/math]

Oh man, that's got to be a great job, but it surely take hell of a time doesn't it?

I guess no one here created impression on their first thread, but you'll get used fast. But there is one problem, it's too damn addictive!

Oh no thanks. I hate rockets. I once tried to build one in a school project and screwed it all up! I'm done with that!

Well Miller's experiment did produce organic substances Well, as nature managed to do it, mankind some time probably will. He rocks, definitely! It's hard, I agree!

Perhaps a little misunderstanding here but I was referring to the equations of velocity!

Heard of it, yeah... Read it... No!

This is earth's speed in relation with the speed of clock too (as you like to call it that way). But anyways, our current definitions of time are good enough and we can pretty well orientate by them, even though we might not yet have the complete picture.

Ye got to listen to me sometimes ye know:rolleyes:

Equations of motions don't really need mass on them, unless you want to find energy out of them.