thedarkshade

Just a warm up! http://youtube.com/watch?v=sAmuzdGYGlo

Lame lame lame! I'm just to addicted to acid rock to grasp a Radiohead concert! But anyways, have a nice time aj;)

It is exactly by proof that you confirm or deny a hypothesis, about anything. I have posted in your previous thread which dealt with this issue and back there too you didn't provide an strong argument and logical enough that would eventually back up what you think and deny Big Bang. We have Martin and Swansont here that are physics experts, and indeed expert in the field and I am sure that they had to deal many times with the Big Bang issue during their career, and if they saw that something was wrong with Big Bang they would notice that and probably let us know too. But not only that they see nothing wrong with it, but they (and all serious physicists) support it. If it is your own opinion that Big Bang didn't happen, then OK, we can't really do anything about it since you strongly support it, but this doesn't give you the right to try to impose your personal beliefs too us. BTW iNow, I really don't think there is need for such offending irony like in your last post.

When the periodic system was first set this was based on atomic mass, but there were some disorders, like elements with bigger atomic mass were placed before those with smaller mass, and Mendeleev couldn't explain this why. It wasn't really like he missed anything but that those disorders were due to isotopes, a term with back then was unknown.

thanks iNow, I just couldn't figure it out.... tooo fast:D:D .. but there's c-100 not c+100

It's got to be like this (IMO): [math]C \% =\frac{m_s}{m_s + m_S} \times 100[/math] multiply with the part under the fraction and you get" [math]C \% \times m_s + C\% \times m_S = m_s \times 100[/math] then move m-substances in one side and the others in the other side: [math]C \%\times m_s - m_s \times 100 = -C\%\times m_S[/math] factorize: [math]m_s(C \% - 100) = m_S[/math] divide with what you got next to m-substance and finally: [math]m_s=\frac{m_S}{C \% - 100}[/math] s = substance S=solvent

It is exactly critical thinking that leads to creativity. You have posted what I could possibly add so, I (and all probably) agree on your view about critical thinking. But, if you refer to truth being found by critical thinking and that the truth must have logic in it, that doesn't really apply. A truth doesn't have to fit our logic, to turn out the way we critically think of it, it just has to be proved that is true or not, and completely ignore the fact that it must fit our logic!

Anything that goes for the betterment of human race without causing any other side effects, can be accepted. This is what I think! I mean, using different animals for testings and experiments which might eventually advance and make better human conditions of life, is something that I see no problem with. But of course, extremism is absolutely not necessary. If you browse through the forum Joey you fill find several threads that deal with this issue and I think you will find them interesting to what's concerning you! But this should belong to biomedical ethics, shouldn't it?

Living "matter" changes, always tries to fit where it is located, seeks for food as a source of energy in a way or another, gets developed, reproduces and then dies, decomposes and becomes non-living. A very rough idea about live and dead, but that's mainly it!

Last time I read something about this it was written -270C, and it was also written that this is expected to decrease due to expansion!

Behave like waves and hit like particle!

If you're asking for this [math]m_substance[/math] that is in the equation that Cap'n posted than you just need tot follow simple mathematical steps!

Could you please be more specific on your question, and than you might get some help. I personally find it hard to understand what you really need in this case!!!

Well, i don't know but I guess my blood was flowing freely enough to let my control my body good enough. You get nightmares when your blood flowing gets stuck somewhere you know!

That has happened to me many times. I sometimes have almost total control of my dream. I can turn situation, place and people in every way I want. It makes me feel powerful!!

Probably for ignorants!

And I always thought correction was necessary...

It's always toward a better naturally selected condition!

The world is about the truth. What would the meaning of the world be if it wasn't about finding out the truth? As for the science, see you yourself:

Oh, this is becoming quite a complete family, we got doctors, captains, princesses, knights, sources, naggers .... cool:D!

Carbon's natural allotropies are diamond and graphite, and fulleren is artificial. With fulleren we understand molecules which can contain from tens to hundreds of carbon atoms. The most stable is considered Buckminster fulleren, made up of 60 C atoms, forming so pentagons and hexagons. The name buckminster fulleren was given due to the philosopher and architect Buckminster Fuller! There is the amorphous carbon too, but that is not considered as a typical alloptropy due to not being 100% carbon!

Just google about it, and you'll get a lot of infos!

I'd say irrational philosophy, Schopenhauer, Bergson, Niche.... they deal with concepts like the OP mentioned!

AFAIK the [ce]H2O -> H^+ + OH^-[/ce] dissociation is only theoretical. IIRC the real dissociation is [ce]2H2O -> H3O^+ + OH^-[/ce]

We are all made up of things that you find them out there in the universe!