Riogho

Lol, I didn't make this as a thread. I made it as a post. As a thread, yes it is pointless.

The following excerpt is from the late physicist Richard P Feynman's book "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" by Feynman, Leighton, and Sands, Addison-Wesley: Menlo Park, CA, 1963 "As we decrease the temperature , the vibration decreases and decreases until, at absolute zero there is a minimum amount of vibration that the atoms can have, but not zero. "

No, it isn't. Vacuum energy says they will never reach absolute zero. And even if IT DID. They would STILL BE MOVING. Or so says feynman. Argue with him if you disagree.

Okay, I am assuming ya'll know what the casimir effect/force is. If you don't look it up on Wiki. My question is simple, what happens to a small hollow tube do to the casimir effect?

It's only an approximation, and further curtailing on it is a bad idea. We need a completely new idea.

If we expanded with the universe, how would we tell the universe was expanding? Relativity, my dear friend, pwns your idea.

Well yea, but we have application for Newton's Laws, but by using the definition of bullshit being = not correct, then they are bullshit as well.

Pre-Calc FTW

Quantum Mechanics is bullshit, it must all be thrown out! There is a true underlying theory that will unify the forces, String Theory, Quantum Mechanics, SuperSym, are all paths leading in the wrong direction! /rant

BUCKY BALLS!

Depends on when it's happened. Perhaps it happened a crapload of tme ago and these few galaxies and stars migrated into the area. *shrugs* All speculatory though.

An electron-positron annihilation would cause quite a few gamma rays, enough to be detected anyways. Though I think more then one annihilation is occuring, I don't know for sure though.

Are you crazy? Yes... he must be crazy.

How would it be a chain reaction?

Everything must be in constant motion, you cannot be at rest. It's known as zero-point energy. Or simply an effect of the uncertainty principle.

Plus you get 40 virgins. Which is always a plus.

If you were at absolute zero the atoms would still be moving.

It's boiled cause its fun to play with fire.

Actually the faster you go, the slower time gets from the reference frame of an outside observer. It never reverses itself though.

What the hell kind of question is this? and by posting this here arn't you getting some slightly biased results?

When I throw a chocolate bar into my toilet bowl, it usually floats. But that's just me.

You can have a one-dimensional object bending in 3 dimensional space.

So you believe in free will?

It also vibrates by nature. You might ask why atoms are constantly oscillating back and forth, but they are, due to the fact that they cannot be at a zero-point because then we would know their position and velocity therefore they MUST be moving.

Yea, I knew how an object with volume would spin, (mass revolving around a point, like a top or the such), and I know that there is an intrinsic property of elementary particles (which are treated as point-like) that since they have angular momentum and yet no volume, they don't actually spin, but just have the properties of something that spin, and my original question was since the black hole started out as a spinning star (obviously orbital angular momentum) if that angular momentum was actually transformed into spin angular momentum. But now that you say it isn't a singular point at all it kind of breaks down my idea. But then again I guess it breaks down everyone's theory there, eh? I'd rather not upset my coworkers of the future Yes, I've worked my way through the first half of my Christmas present (Volumes I and II of the feynman lectures), which means I've completed volume one, with just a minimal bit of help from my precalc teacher. Yes, I am in high school. And people have gotten me confused with Keanu Reeves before. Just checkin.