Riogho

Kepler says ellipse!

The neutron are made of two down quarks and one up quark. The down quarks have a charge of charge -1/3 and the up quark has a charge of +2/3 The charge units are the units of an electrons charge which is defined as one. As you know -1/3 + -1/3 + 2/3 is 0. In an antineutron the antidown quarks have an electric charge of +1/3 and the up quark has a charge of -2/3. Once more, equaling 0. Certain quantum numbers are also opposite, but I don't know enough about those to give you a good explanation so just take it as it is

Because there isn't a crapload of dark matter near your pencil. Dark matter tends to be together, knido f like planets. How could the sun have gravity, and affect teh orbit of the planets but not affect your pencil? Because it isn't close to your pencil. Doesn't mean it isn't there, or that it's gravitation is less strong then the earths.

Mine is way better.

Explain please?

You are fat and gay.

*shrugs* I'm a junior.

Jeez, I knew that

I mean, don't get me wrong I know my math well enough, I taught myself enough calculus to get through the Feynman lectures on mechanics, but there is no way I can do the group theory stuff, etc, without a course or something on it. and that's where the good stuff is.

I'm sure glad I didn't name myself Lockheed. *glances at own username* ... *mumbles and walks off*

Sometimes I wish there was popular science out there that wasn't dumbed down, just math free. *sighs* I'm just sitting patiently with my thumb up my butt waiting for my math education to catch up with my science.

It sounds plausible. But I doubt there are tubes of hydrogen out there that are dense enough to become black holes. However, I think the singularity in a rotating black hole is actually a ring. So that is kinda like a tube ;P

The Theory of Almost Everything - Robert Oerter The God Particle - Leon Lederman The Road to Reality (Math) - Roger Penrose

I don't know... Just an assumption I guess.

But my post wasn't even that good! But I love you too!

Really, because I read singularity. SOMEONE SMART!!! HELP!!!

The problem with antimatter, is the C symmetry is not conserved, and neither is the P symmetry as anti matter is often a... concotion of the weak nuclear force. However, CP symmetry is conserved, so they don't follow the laws of physics that we see on the outside exactly, but on a deeper level, they appear to, though this is still a debated issue.

Well, you got a steam turbine right, and a tub beneath it, you have plasma torches burning whatever the hell you want to put in the tub, which turns the steam turbine which gives your electricity to run the plasma torches. All that is needed is a 1:1 ratio. Then all the metals etc, melt down and filter into the bottom, making the best insulation known to man. Which means money. And geekiness.

Not as much infinite as undefined. n/0 is undefined, not infinite. 0/n is infinite

And what is the point in knowing the true thing someone said if you don't know the person who says it

Hmm... I'll read up on it then.

My best friend and I actaully actively work toward improving our geekiness factor. For example our plasma converter we are working on should increase our geekiness factor by at least 600%.

Get him Stephen Hawking addicted, or Kip S Thorne addicted, or Leon Lederman addicted, or even Penrose addicted for god-sake. Convert the man! Convert him!

Yep, Dan Brown sure is a load of crap.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that ΔxΔp ≥ ħ/2 and thus anything confined to a box smaller than Δx would have a momentum of uncertainty proportionally greater. You preon model proposes particles smaller than the elementary particles they make up, therefore, the momentum of uncertainty Δp should be greater than the particles themselves. Scattering experiments have shown that quarks and leptons are "pointlike" down to distance scales of less than 10−18 m (or 1/1000 of a proton diameter). The momentum uncertainty of a preon (of whatever mass) confined to a box of this size is about 200 GeV, 50,000 times larger than the rest mass of an up-quark and 400,000 times larger than the rest mass of an electron. Thus, your preon model represents a mass paradox: How could quarks or electrons be made of smaller particles that would have many orders of magnitude greater mass-energies arising from their enormous momenta?