n4t3

you've got a cold heart btw i glanced at your blog. you know carbon is really just a hexagon mapped to a circle right? this is directly related to the subject matter, hypervalent_iodine. trust me. lol unlock the link.

make an exception

Uncool, ok man, thanks for the improved response. i actually do not need any type of scrutiny on my old/obsolete papers at this time, i have already received it. since then, i have received several months of training in theoretical physics. i just posted the my amateur papers here to show progress and give a timeline for my story. i am just asking for donations so my teammate and I can finish quark confinement and do some seriously exciting stuff. but thank you for the offer, i certainly appreciate it. I wish that I had met you a year ago! our newest paper i cannot post yet because it is still subject to review and i am doing it with somebody else. but as soon as it is complete, i will post it here on the forums to discuss it. ok, i understand. hehe dude i was re-thinking the Riemann surface was all, and that guy is already defined nicely.

hey thanks for the meaningful response! my recommendation to anybody, would be to get a degree in computer science, and then use that acquired knowledge of creative programming, linear systems, and logic in a different field, such as physics, chemistry, biology, sociology/psychology, or business, or whatever. because really, programming a computer is just a big creative thought experiment, which teaches you how to learn rapidly. so if your a programmer, Google and Wikipedia are your best friends, and the internet allows you to connect and share ideas with anybody on the planet at the speed of light, so rapid advancement and accelerated learning are absolutely possible with the internet! when this is all through, i am going to teach how to use the internet to learn quickly and efficiently. I mean after I wrote these the two initial papers, it became clear to me that I needed help from a real physicist. And eventually, on Google Groups, I found one! he is from Ukraine and had been working on a similar theory as me since 2004, so as you can imagine, we had LOTS of ideas to share and discuss! and our joint publication and progress was going amazing until he suffered the stroke. so thats why i'm here, i'm trying to get donations and to tell our story. i figured if people were actually aware of what we are doing, then they would certainly help us finish this difficult journey up if you donate to us, you know your money is going to something worthwhile, rather than some worthless, greedy ceo ;-) it just means you can imagine time as being a circle. literally, a circle, like the face of a clock. so from the spin/orbit of the smallest particle, to the spin/orbit of our planet, solar system, galaxy, galactic cluster, etc, everthing is just a circle, and behaves like a clock. the Mayans use combinations of circles with different radiuses to describe this stuff. tbh idk alot yet about the specifics of Mayan calendar, yet, but i know they use circular combinations to describe anything. heres a real quick image on this. see how one can just connect the circles together to encode stuff? its a very, very powerful idea. once i understood this concept, it became very clear to me that the world was not going to end lmfao, just another cycle. the ancient Egyptians also understood all of this (I highly recommend watching, for example, The Pyramid Code, its actually on netflix). their society was remarkably advanced, much more advanced that ours is today, at least in certain technological sectors. mark my words on that. but its difficult for many to admit hehe. egyptology is also currently undergoing a revolution, just as physics is this year!! The ancient Egyptions and ancient Mayans understood the concept of cyclic time, just as our civilization is learning about. it is a remarkably powerful idea. at some point in our history (probably a few thousand years ago), these concepts were lost due to war or whatever, but are slowly being re-learned and re-discovered. this understanding of cyclic/non-linear time is required to develop a new scientific theory of the universe. the concept of linear time simply will not suffice. know what i mean? hehe your probably right, but i'm still catching up on the posts. but i have zero respect for people who go around polluting others posts, you know what i mean? i just now see that personal attacks are not allowed here! wow i wish this was implemented on other forums!!!

haha oh yeah man for sure, thats our game plan! ;-) we just need to get our first paper done, and then we'll earn all that good stuff. Now as you've read, my teammate had an accident and the financial stuff has shifted our focus from physics to other "real life" stuff, which has slowed our progress significantly. so right now we are in a period of temporary struggle, which is why I am asking for donations here, so we can finish this fast and efficiently. If we can get even minimal assistance I'm going to forward practically all of the donations to my teammate, who (I'm sure) is facing a medical bill nightmare. we need this fellow to be feeling good and free of finances so he can get his gameface on. so by this point its not a matter of "if", its a matter of "when". donations will help us get back on our feet faster. know what I mean? haha well if you actually would have read the post . from my experience, i've found that the internet forums are full of mediocre people like you who feel the need to post mediocre things. so looks like your just another one of those guys lol but yeah when i wrote the first and second paper, I had practically no physics education, just computer science and mathematics, and my mathematics education did not actually include manifold theory. when i wrote the first paper (like a year ago), i was describing a holographic universe with fractal/fractional values embedded at all spacetime points like pixels on a computer screen, and was using the Fibonacci sequence to make sense of it. this was my computer science background. at this point, i wasn't aware that I was describing a holographic universe, but now that i look back, this is all clear. hehe yeah, in the second paper, i invented my own fractal manifolds. so yeah, when i started working with my teammate, i was so happy when he introduced Riemann manifolds to me and saw that fractals work great with them!! but yeah, i mean inventing the shit is the fun part. so yeah, then i wasn't aware that Riemann manifolds could be actually modified for what I was doing. i posted those two amateur papers just to tell my story, and throw out some of the old ideas, and to show that i'm serious about finishing this. since then, my teammate has provided me with a remarkable education in theoretical physics. so in our new theory, with quark confinement and black holes, all of these concepts in my original two initial papers are either simplified, or implied in our new one. gotta love Riemann manifolds!! yeah i gotta say, Bernhard Riemann is the man!!

My name is Nathan Schmidt. I'm a computer science masters student in Idaho, USA. Almost exactly one year ago, I had an idea. This idea involved fractal geometry, recursively iterated functions, the golden ratio, and the Fibonacci sequence, and cyclic time (which, when fully developed down the road, would be consistent with the Mayan calendar) From that moment, I knew this was the most powerful idea I had ever imagined in my entire life, and based on my limited knowledge of string theory, I knew that these computer science concepts be applied directly to physics. So I took on this challenge and I began developing the concepts in precisely the same way one develops computer programs. I spent countless hours searching Google, YouTube, and Wikipedia and I eventually realized that developing computer algorithms and data structures are no different than developing equations and mathematical structures, they only appear to be different. So why is this not yet obvious to mainstream computer scientists, physicists, and mathematicians? Because the clear, concise, and logical bridges between these different fields are not yet complete. When these bridges are build, it will transform all of science, engineering, and mathematics and allow physics to establish a unified field theory. Basically, particles may be treated as recursively iterated functions, which operate as fractal generators. Theres obviously alot more too it, but thats a start. So I wrote my first paper, Toward a fractal supersymmetry and submitted it to a journal. I figured the paper probably needed some refinement so I was eager to get some feedback. Eventually, I decided I couldn't wait any longer so I posted the idea on the Physics Forums. This was exciting, I finally got to discuss my theory with others online! Rather than receiving rigorous scrutiny and constructive critisism so I could refine my theory, I was insulted and attacked for proposing such an idea, as well as being a computer scientist. The forum moderator, Rpenner, even contacted my university and faculty at the computer science department (who I had been working for the last three years: two years as a bioinformatics research assistant and one year as a teaching assistant) and said silly things about me. Well, all this did was piss me off. So I recalled the first paper from the journal before they had time to get back, took a break from my masters thesis (bioinformatics and sequence analysis of DNA and amino acids from NCBI) and spent the next couple months developing my own unified field theory, based on computer science concepts, including iterated functions, the Mandelbrot set, the Fibonacci sequence, etc. to write my second paper Toward a fractal-friendly spacetime: preliminary enhancements to general relativity and a principle on fractal equivalence. I put that on the forums, and it shut them the hell up. Finally, I felt a partial victory. Show those physicists who they're dealing with!! But, apparently, my paper was still too controversial and underdeveloped to publish in a journal, so it was rejected. At this point I knew that I needed to acquire physics training, and for this I needed help. After searching the internet, eventually, I teamed up with a physicist from Ukraine. Together, we joined forces and embarked on a radical journey: The Race for Unification. Our mission: to proof quark confinement and use that to establish an experimentally-verifiable unified field theory. The ultimate quest! After months of accelerated learning, collaboration, and late nights, we began drafting our first joint publication, which establishes a duality between quarks and black holes. This was amazing, I had never learned so much in my entire life! Our plan was (and still is!) to release an introductory paper for our theory at one of the elite physics journals, and then follow it up with a series of related and more detailed papers. Then, while developing the quark confinement proof, my teammate had a stroke. He stopped communicating with me, and then some time later his wife emailed me and told me what happened. At that point, the only thing I knew to do was finish the paper up the best I could and submit it to the journal, but the proof wasn't finished, and I didn't have the knowledge to finish it. The journal provided very brief/short/elementary reports, it was clear that they didn't even read our paper (two reports were only a paragraph and one was only a sentence long). This was very upsetting. My teammate was in the hospital and had no idea what was going on, so I wanted to finish this up and get us this publication so we could get support and resources for our research. Unfortunately, the journal rejected the paper... Since then, my teammate has made an incredible recovery, and we plan resume joint operations here in the next several weeks. What a brave guy! Truly amazing!! In the mean time, I'm finishing my masters, beefing up our paper for a future resubmission, and earning money. But at this point, we are both facing financial difficulties, especially my partner, and this has significantly slowed down our progress because we spent more time dealing with money than focusing on completing our theory. At this point, it is only a matter of time until we emerge victorious. I know it! The sooner we can finish our theory, the sooner we can get assistance and support from the rest of the scientific community. For this, I've set up a link disabled by moderator. If you can help us out even a little bit to free our minds from this financial crap so we can focus on whats really important, all we need right now is enough to eat, sleep and think, so we can finish this thing once and for all!! Once the theory is complete, I plan to finish building the bridge between computer science and physics, and then apply these concepts to biology. This will transform science!!! For a more complete version of my current story, click here. I watched a series of videos, which are also related to our theory: The Colors of Infinity, Hunting the Hidden Dimension, The Secret life of Chaos, and . All these videos are related. Always remember, fractal geometry is the language of chaos theory. ;-) Thanks for any advice, knowledge, or financial support you can provide! Nathan aka 'n4t3'

First of all I hope this is a legitimate location to post this, as I've had enormous difficulty finding a forum that will even accept a new theory. :-S I'm proposing a new theory regarding spacetime and the preliminary underpinnings of some form of quantum-level relativity. A draft of my paper is located here: https://docs.google....JmOWYw&hl=en_US Its my first attempt at a scientific publication and the document still needs a little bit of work/tweaking, but its a start. The 3 real-valued dimensions of space are replaced with 3 complex-valued dimensions, allowing for a total of 6 spatial dimensions. The dimension of "time" is removed and the theory proposes that "time" itself is a periodic rate of change of spatial arrangements. By making the dimensions themselves complex, we allow them to fluctuate on all levels to account for scale-invariant non-linearity. The real and imaginary components of the 3 complex dimensions are interpreted as rates of change, generated by "clockwise" and "counter-clockwise" particle spin, in the form of acceleration. It appears that principle of relativity may be satisfied on the quantum level, and that the universe may be "clockwork" on the quantum scale. We explain how this may be possible using pythagorean theorem. Iterated functions are incorporated into the metric tensor, where it is proposed that particles behave as iterated functions. Mass itself may be the intersection of the real and imaginary manifold components, allowing spacetime to "bend" according to GR. Then particle spin propogates charge throughougt the universe, thus in short, all spatial structures may be "generated" via quantized particle acceleration. Although perhaps bizarre, we assert that the laws of physics are "deterministic" and that all degrees of biological consciousness may adhere to "non-deterministic" behavior, and propose that this may be proven someday in neuroscience. We assert that chaos theory may be true and that fractal geometry can be used to describe the patterns observed in nature, on all scales. Most of the criticism I have received thus far is regarding the c^6, and I am having trouble interpreting this myself, but maybe it has something to do with the "speed" of a wormhole, namely a trajectory over a 6-dimensional hypervolume? The 8-dimensional non-linear combinations to produce this may have something to do with a tesseract. But yeah this is a work in progress lol. Any thoughts? Suggestions? (Hopefully constructive) Criticism?