Jump to content

superman82

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by superman82

  1. lol. Very funny insane allien but as mentioned as before I wont know about this design until have made a small scale prototype. I am fairly confident that it'll work cause I can picture it like being able to predict how a swing moves for example. So I'll get back to you all and if it does work out then I have no intention of keeping this idea to myself. The whole reason when all this brainstorming come about was when I was in a third world country and I had alotta time on my hands. The countries power supply was and still is pants so I got thinking and now I just simply wanna see if it can put my thoughts into action and not keep them to myself. So as soon as I make my model and get the results whatever they are I will indeed update you all. thank you so far for your help and will chat soon!!
  2. ok ladies & gents I must admit that I av explained myself poorly so here we go again... I totally agree that "Energy cannot be created or destroyed" this is very a basic law of physics right? So lets say the energys already there in the form of gravity just like how a hydro dam works and due to the way I'v thought of a design gravity will constantly be present therefore continuous energy production.....but... where "thedarkshade" has pointed out "Because when molecules hit each other there is always some loss of energy, and this way sooner or later that water would stop moving." This would probably be the downfall of my idea
  3. no worries at all guys. I do intend to make a model, can very easily make one and will do as so as I got the finances. in the meantime though what would be the answer to the 2 questions asked earlier please?? It'll keep me going in the meantime ta!
  4. Hello, hi, bonjour etc. to all! I only reckon that I may how come up with a way to produce energy with no combustion fuel which makes its pollution FREE!! I know what your thinking...what planets is this guy on etc. cause it already exists right?? i.e solar power, wind turbines, tidal, hydro and wave. the thing is with the above they have flaws .... solar:- dont work well on cloudy days and cant produce enough juice. wind:- noisy ugly things that only work in certain places, ruins tv reception and only produce the goods when windy of course tidal:- extremely expensive and only works in certain places but does produce loadsa power hydro:- ok but limited to certain places plus can have a dramatic effect on the local wildlife. also costs s*@%loads to build. wave:- quality idea but suitable sites needed and only works when waves are available. So what am I bangin on about then is I guess the next question rite? I've thought of a way to make a power plant which is hydro based but does not require any river or sea. In fact its stationary water that will be moved by itself and forever keep moving by itself therefore never needing to refuel and doesnt depend on anything but itself!! I'm posted this thread to ask if anyone could help me do some calculations please??? I would like to know: 1- How much energy does a general power station produce in a month? (whether its nuclear or fossil fuel based dont matter just average will do) 2- How much water pressure is required to turn a/some turbine(s) in a/some generator(s) to produce that much power in a month? As corny as this sounds but knowing this info is potentially the begining of another path to saving the world! There I said it! but just imagine zero pollution or minimal heat produced from power stations - the impact it could have on the greenhouse effect and electric cars are round the corner in all (GM Hy-wire) so there'd be no guilt of driving them. The only two main worries I got are:- 1-The idea I got is SO flippin simple that its more than likely been thought of I reckon. The only thing is I've spent alota time looking around for my design of powerplant and I can't find anywhere which makes me wonder.....??? Could someone have thought of it but found that it was too expensive to make, too impractical or simply it was just scientifically/mathematically impossible to do or something?? either way I am respectfully reluctant to divulge the design at this moment in time 2-Funding the damn project if its worthwile (one step at a time though eh) I'm not really a science nut, I did study A level physics though but didnt get far in it. I did it years ago and am very rusty at physics calculations. My A level teacher was a right bitch and wernt very helpful so if something come about this then I would so be loving it!! Anyway if your still awake after reading all that waffle and can assist in this great cause then please do kind regards SM82
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.