alanejackson

~~~~~~~~~~ Magnetosynthesis - Magnetotaxis generated cellular cytoplasmic streaming/circulation. Light is to Plants what/as Magnetic Fields are to Us. We use magnetic Fields for the same reason plants use light. The circulation in the cell that I'm referring to is caused by the movement of magnetically migrating organelles, and is not due to the Earth's magnetic attraction, of the magnetic/magnetite particles found within our bodies. SCIENCE, Vol.215, 19 March 1982. Page 1492 Magnetic Navigation and Attractive Possibility. "Investigators find magnetic particles in organisms ranging from bacteria to man; their role in orientation is still problematic." Discover, January 1993. MAGNETIC MINDS "...... they found that a thimbleful of brain tissue contains about 5 million magnetite crystals,....." It is magnetic direction rather than magnetic attraction being utilized within our cells, once the magnetite chain is produced within an organelle. Dispersion of matter within the cells of warm-blooded animals occurs, or is a byproduct of the currents in the protoplasm resulting from the magnetic migration of organelles. Compared to cold blooded animals, the dissemination of matter within the cells of warm-blooded animals needs to occur quicker, or at a more rapid pace, to facilitate the more complex, warmer metabolism. This is accomplished by a frequent pattern of occurrence of reorientation in a magnetic field. Without a sufficient rate of reorientation, magnetically, the protoplasm within warm-blooded animal cells becomes detrimentally stagnant, unable to achieve the degree of matter dissemination required for mechanisms to function properly, and the result is varying degrees of osteoporosis or even death. The temperature of warm-blooded cells is required and maintain by a higher rate of metabolic operations, compared to that of the cold-blooded cell. And the warm-blooded metabolism requires more cytoplasmic streaming/circulation, compared to that of the cold-blooded. Evolutionary speaking, this affords warm-blooded animals a more rapid response time in dealing with its adaptation to changing/threatening environmental conditions. It Is the Theory Which Decides What We Can Observe. -- Albert Einstein ~~~~~~~~~~ Linguistic Correction. Or. Vocabulary/Nomenclature Under Construction. "Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence." "The puzzle arises out of a linguistic mistake." -- Budwick Liftinstien Puzzle - 1. to be perplexed, etc. 2. to exercise one's mind, as over the solution of a problem. Thus: "The solution/answer arises out of a linguistic correction." -- Alan E. Jackson Wordsmith - a person who uses language skillfully. Philologist - historical linguist. Cell Biology - "The mitochondrion and the chloroplast" - Encyclopædia Britannica 2003. "Mitochondria and chloroplasts are the powerhouses of the cell. Mitochondria appear in both plant and animal cells as elongated, cylindrical bodies, roughly one micrometre inlength and closely packed in regions actively using metabolic energy. Oxidizing the products of cytoplasmic metabolism, they convert the energy so liberated into adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the energy currency of the cell. Chloroplasts are the photosynthetic organelles in plant and plantlike bacterial cells. They trap light energy and convert it partly into ATP but mainly into certain chemically reduced molecules that, together with ATP, are used in the first steps of carbohydrate production. Mitochondria and chloroplasts share a certain structural resemblance, and both have a somewhat independent existence within the cell, synthesizing some proteins and dividing according to their own genetic instructions." "They trap light energy ......". There is the linguistic mistake. The correct terminology should be; "They utilize electromagnetic energy ....." Solution - Chloroplasts are electromagnetotactic. Mitochondria are electromagnetotactic. They both preform electromagneticsynthesis, and move/migrate due to electromagnetotaxis. The theory of Magnetrition identifies both the mitochondria and chloroplasts as utilizing/harnessing electromagnetic energy. And each have evolved variations of mechanisms, with the ability to benefit from what the electromagnetic spectrum offers. Surface tissues of biological structures utilize aspects of the electromagnetic spectrum unable to achieve deeper penetration, and may also shield interiors. These processes resulting in the production of chlorophyll, vitamin D, and beta-carotene, etc. are more visually recognizable/noticeable. Interior membranes/tissues are also found to be under the influence, and able to derive benefits from energy broadcast via wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. Proposed new terminology. First Order Magnetics - free, traveling electromagnetic energy. Second Order Magnetics - captured/stored electromagnetic energy. Alan Search + Share ~ Magnetrition

Is it microgravitational field? Or micromagnetic field? Or Both? "Experiments to compare the orientation of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum to north- or south-pole magnets were conducted in normal gravity and in the microgravity environments aboard the Space Shuttle and Space Station MIR. In each of the microgravity situations studied, bacteria were impaired in their ability to orient to magnets, suggesting that on earth the bacteria use magnetosomes to respond to gravity." http://www.ksu.edu/biology/bio/facul...abstract1.html 1 Kings 4:29 And God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much, and largeness of heart, even as the sand that is on the sea shore. They have the least education. The least nutritional benefits. The theory of Magnetrition predicts that we today will be seen as having poor health compared to those in the future educated as to why a bird egg requires turning. ~~~~~~~~~ From w...@biobase.dkWed Feb 28 10:36:04 1996 Date: 28 Feb 1996 08:50:40 GMT From: Troels Wind <w...@biobase.dk> To: biofo...@net.bio.net Subject: Re: women's converging menstrual cycles Alan E. Jackson (AJack...@ST.CEU.EDU) wrote: (long article on possible action of magnetic field in converging menstrual cycles - DELETED) TROELS WIND comments (indented by > sign): > What a pile of nonsence! Regarding womens cycle, stick > to the pheromone theory. I dont have any refs, but any > university library should be able to help you out. ALEX BEREZIN comments: Dear Dr/Mr/Ms Troels, I wonder why you go so harsh on Alan Jackson posting. It is not to say that his assumption (that magnetic effects are important in this case) is necessarily the explanation (or even relevant in this case), but the whole issue of magnetic bacteria, etc is not at all a pseudo-science as you may think. There was a major article on this recently, I forgot exactly where, but in something like Sci.Amer. or Amer.Scientists. (NOT in a crap journal). In the effect of phase locking the particular type of the leading interaction is often secondary. For example, in establishing coherency in laser systems several DIFFERENT mechanisms may (independently and/or concurently) lead to the same result (phase locking in a dominant frequency mode). It may well be that in a case of menstrual converging there is no a single ('one size fits all') mechanism, but several competing routes can be opertaional. Making assumption, testing them, rejecting, etc. is what we call science. Saying (as you do) ... "stick to the pheromon theory ..." is a pseudo-science (or at best metaphysics), because it presumes that you know the 'true answer', which often turn out to be wrong. > Mr. Jackson, youre sick! Or maybe your magnetic bacteria > inside (!) your cells have lost track of 'time and space'. > BTW, when did you perform your last time-travel? BEREZIN: You should be aware by that time that personal insults in science damage (always and invariably) YOUR credebility, not the credebility of your opponents (read Einstein's biography for this matter). > No doubt megnetism plays some role in life, but the above > is at best pure fantasy, or even worse, somebodys attempt > to create 'scientific' proof for their 'WonderMagnets' > $200 each to hang around your neck. BEREZIN: Despite booming market and a lot of crap around the things like 'healing magnets' or 'healing crystals', the whole matter is far from being dismissted altogether and warrants serious and open minded studies some of which are fortunately go on. > Furthermore, Mr. Jackson, > the next time you feel like spreading your pseudo > science around, at least have the currage to include > proper references AND make a sharp distinction between > what is YOUR ideas/theories and what is others. BEREZIN: I concur with you on the need of proper referencing, but that's a technical suggestion which equally applys to you. > I hope you get better soon, > Troels BEREZIN: I hope you too. ********************************** Alexander A. Berezin, PhD Department of Engineering Physics McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4L7 tel. (905) 525-9140 ext. 24546 e-mail: BERE...@MCMASTER.CA ********************************** Using Magnets To Turn Off The Brains Speech Center Science editor at the Telegraph, Roger Highfield, recently volunteered to subject his brain to intense magnetic fields. The research showed that a sufficiently strong, precisely directed magnetic field can interrupt the parts of the brain responsible for speech. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2008/05/16/scibrain216.xml ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "A Sixth Sense for a Wired World." "For the few people who have rare earth magnets implanted in their fingers, these are among the reported effects -- a finger that feels electromagnetic fields along with the normal sense of touch. According to Huffman, the magnet works by moving very slightly, or with a noticeable oscillation, in response to EM fields. This stimulates the somatosensory receptors in the fingertip, the same nerves that are responsible for perceiving pressure, temperature and pain. Huffman and other recipients found they could locate electric stovetops and motors, and pick out live electrical cables. Appliance cords in the United States give off a 60-Hz field, a sensation with which Huffman has become intimately familiar. "It is a light, rapid buzz," he says." http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mods/news/2006/06/71087

Magnetotaxis, something in common, genetically. The theory of Magnetrition was inspired, and is based on the properties and behavior of magnetotactic bacteria, along with statistical data indicating, a high degree of movement required in/for the maintenance of warm-blooded metabolisms, or cellular deterioration corresponding with a lack of movement in warm-blooded metabolisms. Magnetrition predicts magnetotactic organelles serving the same function within warm-blooded cells, as does the phototactic chloroplast does in the plant cell. And, since the chloroplast are considered to be a corresponding organelle in plant cells, to the mitochondria in ours, I have been considering the latter organelle as the prime candidate predicted. However, after 20 some years of gathering data concerning the matter, along with indications that most lifeforms use the Earth's magnetic field as an aid in migration, so too are found indications that most organelles used magnetotaxis in their locomotion. And may do so due to genetic inheritance. ~~~~~~~~~~~ It’s the network, stupid </view/generic/id/32048/title/It%E2%80%99s_the_network%2C_stupid> The complexity of humans may lie not in genes but in the web of interactions among the proteins they make. By Patrick Barry. May 12th, 2008 Web of protein interactions reflects human complexity better than number of genes. Humans don’t have many more genes than fruit flies or microscopic roundworms, but the network of protein interactions in human cells is much larger and more complex, a new estimate shows. While people have only about 20,000 genes, the proteins encoded by those genes interact in roughly 650,000 ways. That network of interactions, or “interactome,” is about 10 times larger than that of the fruit fly and three times the size of the roundworm’s interactome. While the interactome encompasses more of an organism’s complexity than the genome alone, Stumpf says that comparing interactomes captures only part of the total difference in complexity between species. Interactomes deal exclusively with proteins, but other kinds of molecules such as small RNAs are also cogs in a cell’s baroque machinery. “It’s much, much more than just the organization of protein interactions,” Stumpf says. “There’s so much we don’t know. It’s such an exciting time.” ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Home </view/home> / News </view/latest> / December 15th, 2007; Vol.172 #24 </view/issue/id/9201/title/December_15th%2C_2007%3B_Vol.172_%2324> / News item Cells' innards may share origin. By Patrick Barry. December 11th, 2007. From Washington, D.C., at a meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology Despite their outward differences, many of the organelles within cells may have a common evolutionary heritage. In a case of scientific serendipity, data gathered by separate research teams working on various organelles lend new support to the theory that a simpler cellular compartment gave rise to the organelles' diverse modern forms. "We all had been looking at specific organelles, but sitting there [at the conference] listening to the other scientists speak, there seemed to be something common in all of them," says Damien Devos of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg, Germany. Several research groups had been studying proteins that guide the movements and interactions of organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the nucleus. "The data are contradictory if you look at one protein at a time," says Joel B. Dacks of the University of Cambridge in England. "But if you look at them together, it fits." Each protein on an organelle has evolved at a different rate, so each tells a different story about how long ago that organelle might have diverged from an ancient, simpler organelle and begun developing unique functions. But Dacks suggests that because all the proteins on one organelle must function together, a change in even one protein could be enough to send the whole compartment off in a new evolutionary direction. Viewed this way, the measured similarities among the versions of organelle proteins such as Rab, SNARE, and Adaptin suggest they all evolved from a compartment in an ancestral cell that lived long before multicellular life arose, Devos and Dacks say. Such a scenario would contradict the idea that organelles such as the Golgi apparatus and the ER independently evolved, perhaps from pockets in the cell's outer membrane. "They all came from the same place," Dacks postulates. However, even if further research supports the new theory, it would not apply to energy-converting mitochondria or sunlight-absorbing chloroplasts, which are known to have evolved from ancient, independent-living bacteria that became incorporated into the cells. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Genetic mutations in cells' internal powerhouses could contribute to aging by stifling tissue maintenance. Home </view/home> / News </view/latest> / July 30th, 2005; Vol.168 #5 </view/issue/id/6420/title/July_30th%2C_2005%3B_Vol.168_%235> / News item Cell death may spur aging. By Christen Brownlee. July 25th, 2005. OL' MUTANT. Excess mutations in cells' power-generating organelles have aged the mouse on the right far faster than the normal mouse of the same age at left.J. Miller Genetic mutations in cells' internal powerhouses could contribute to aging by stifling tissue maintenance, according to new research. These power-generating organelles, known as mitochondria, have their own DNA separate from that in a cell's nucleus. In a previous study, researchers in Sweden created mutant strains of mice that accumulated excess mitochondrial mutations. The mice aged faster than normal, suggesting that mutations contribute to aging. Tomas Prolla of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and his colleagues set out to find out just how the mutations might be doing this. Working with the same mutant-mouse strain that the Swedish researchers did, Prolla's team measured levels of cell death, or apoptosis, in several different tissues. When compared with tissues from normal mice, many of the tissues in the mutant strain showed significantly more apoptosis. The researchers suggest that the damaged mitochondria prompt cells to die. Prolla and his colleagues note in the July 15 Science that the loss of critical cells, such as stem cells responsible for maintaining most tissues, could lead to gray hair, failing senses, and other signs of old age. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Home </view/home> / News </view/latest> / March 5th, 2005; Vol.167 #10 </view/issue/id/5941/title/March_5th%2C_2005%3B_Vol.167_%2310> / News item Cytoplasm affects embryonic development. By Christen Brownlee. February 28th, 2005. New research provides the best evidence yet that a fertilized egg's nucleus isn't the sole site of control for an embryo's development. Signals emanating from the cell's mitochondria-its power-generating organelles-also appear to influence how an organism grows. Mitochondria carry their own DNA, which is unrelated to the genetic material in a cell's nucleus. Scientists have been unsure whether mitochondrial DNA has an impact on developmental processes. To investigate this, Zuo-Yan Zhu and his colleagues at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Wuhan cloned carp through a technique called nuclear transfer. This method removes the nucleus from one cell and inserts it into an egg that has had its own nucleus removed. However, instead of inserting carp nuclei into carp eggs, Zhu's team inserted them into goldfish eggs. Normal carp have 33 to 36 vertebrae. However, the resulting cloned fish had between 26 and 28 vertebrae-the same number as goldfish-suggesting that mitochondrial DNA in the goldfish eggs had affected the carps' development. Zhu notes that these results, published in the March Biology of Reproduction, may make researchers think twice about proposals to clone extinct animals using the eggs of living species. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?attachment_id=136'>http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?attachment_id=136 Posetd by Albert de Roos on Sunday, May 27, 2007, at 00:58, and filed under morphology <http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?cat=1>.'>http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?cat=1>. Stage I (35-300 um): During early stage I (35-75 um diameter), the distinctive polarity of stage 0 oocytes is lost, and oocytes appear symmetrical in shape and cytoplasmic organization. The growing nucleus, or germinal vesicle (GV), moves to the center of the oocyte and cytoplasmic organelles, such as mitochondria, become dispersed throughout the cytoplasm (JPEG: 55 KB). Mitochondria begin to aggregate into perinuclear clumps, and by mid-stage I, oocytes contain one or two prominent mitochondrial aggregates, variously referred to as the Balbiani bodies, mitochondrial clouds, or mitochondrial masses (JPEG: 52 KB). These masses are readily visible in light micrographs of the transparent, pre-vitellogenic, stage I oocytes (JPEG: 9 KB). The granular fibrillar germ plasm is associated with the mitochondrial mass of stage I oocytes, as are several maternal RNAs. From here <http://www.biology.utah.edu/gard/HTML/Oogenesis/Oogenesis_body.htm>. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ old hypotheses The mitochondrion as a reduced nucleus <http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?p=181>'>http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?p=181> 2007 08 19 Albert de Roos. When I started this work, I still thought of the mitochondrion as an independent unit, and pondered the possibility that the proto-mitochondrion was a reduced nucleus due to a mitosis gone wrong. In this way, two interdependent cells were obtained. The first would be the nucleus but without essential metabolic proteins, the second a remnant […] http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/ http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/?page_id=226

Food for Thought Many reports are showing a connection between mental retardation and shots/vaccinations given/sold to the young child, and now crib death is being shown to be caused by the new practice of taking the newly born away from the mother, and charging for another bed. All this on the heels of the scam to sell formula to mothers for the feeding of their new born, in place of nature's own. Having caused much retardation also? But many to get rich. Has our fathers house been turned into a market place? Can we turn the tables? "The benefits of breast-feeding are well known. Mother's milk has the ideal balance of nutrients for developing babies; it's nature's perfect baby food. It may also be the perfect brain food. Dr. Michael Kramer, a Professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at McGill University, has confirmed what scientists have suspected for a while: breast-feeding contributes to higher IQ scores later in life. Dr. Kramer found that 6-year-olds who nursed exclusively had slightly higher IQ scores than kids who weren't exclusively breast-fed as infants. Just why breast-feeding boosts intelligence isn't yet known. Dr. Kramer says it could be something in the milk but, just as likely, it could be a more intensive mother-child interaction which might lead to better brain development." - Quirks & Quarks http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/archives/07-08/may10.html Maybe this is the reason it is now shown to be wrong? >" As I mentioned before, my experience in college has been that paying customers are less apt to throw away their grades, thus leading to a better learning environment, one I'm more interested in being a part of." Matthew 10:8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Paying customers are less apt to throw away their disinformation that they paid for, and now are shown to have over-valued, when they should. Paying customers are less apt to throw away their information they paid for, and become less likely to share, information, with others freely. A tuff pill for some to take maybe, but think about it. Could get US right with God again. Some theologians are beginning to agree the term "virgin" meant "young mother". And this fits my theory about having to move often in the Earth's magnetic field. The younger the mother, the more active she is, and the more she is likely to facilitate the required movement for the child she carries. While today's medicine, working hand in hand with politics, is telling the women to wait until, they've been used to help pay off a war deficit, that has been shown to have made many in the parties much more wealthy. Deuteronomy 32:25 The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs. Psalm 8:2 Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger. Isaiah 49:15 Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. Luke 21:23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. Luke 23:29 For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.

Why turn bird eggs or Why replace our politicians "Why Turn Eggs? Egg turning helps the embryo grow uniformly. Left in one position, gravity would force heaviest growth downward. Might not kill the embryo, but would make it weaker?" University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Just how many times do you turn an egg? Seems to be a widespread differing view across the internet on how many times you should turn incubating eggs. Some people will have the luxury of an incubator with an automatic egg turner built in whilst the rest of us have to turn our eggs manually, so what is the correct number of times to turn your eggs? I`m afraid if you search the internet everyone has a differing view of how many times fertilized eggs should be turned, 1,3,5 or more times a day, one thing they do have in common is that you should turn them an odd number so one side of the egg isnt allways on the bottom. Also you should mark your eggs with a cross (using a pencil) so you know which way up the eggs were the last time you turned them. The first two times we incubated eggs we turned one lot 3 times a day and the next batch 5 times a day… both clutches of eggs failed (due to a faulty thermometer reading) but the last time we incubated eggs we were given the advice of just turning the eggs once per day. We had 10 of the 12 eggs hatch using this method so I suspect the amount of times you turn your eggs really makes no difference at all! Make your own choice on how many times to turn your eggs and just see how it goes, thats the only advice I can give you." http://chickens.not-likely.co.uk/?p=45 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Few people seems to be aware of the facts, and their educated guess reflects it. Some incubators continually keep the bird egg moving, usually back and forth. The bird moves them about haphazardly. The cold-blooded reptile egg does not require turning during its development, and it grows uniformly without turning. It's known that turning a reptile egg usually kills it. Yet, reptiles and birds are very closely related. But, reptiles are not found nesting in the trees. Birds, are reptiles that moved to the trees, adapted, learned to take advantage the different environment, and now must move like the trees do. The theory of Magnetrition says, this need to be moved is a requirement throughout the life of all warm blooded animals. The movement is seen happening/taking place as a result of a survival instinct, diminishable with age, until now. Magnetrition points out movement of the warm blooded cell is required to keep a magnetically migrating organelle moving and thus performing its rule in the microscopic biological structure. Many think the need to turn/move the bird's egg is for gravitational reasons. The reasoning offered by Magnetrition points to it being for magnetic purposes, but does not rule out a gravitational need to move also. Magnetrition indicates, magnetic bacteria and the mitochondria have the same properties, and some research in space report magnetic bacteria not functioning as on earth. Like us, the bacteria/mitochondria has likely adapted to utilizing both. The theory of Magnetrition predicts that people will soon be kept moving about every 10 min. in a magnetic field like the Earth's. And it will be seen by many to have been noticed as a requirement since 1985, but due to poor leadership in the media, government officials, and political ignorance and deniability in an effort to avoid change in monied interests, not implemented as soon as in should have been. Alan Search + Share ~ Magnetrition http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm

From the book: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE MIND. By Gordon Rattray Taylor. Published in Penguin Books 1981. "Scientist have adapted to the idea that the brain is not only an electrical but also a chemical device. They have hardly yet absorbed the notion that it may have a third, wholly unexplored, aspect. It may be a magnetic device. Hamer, Gavalas-Medice and Bawin have made an attempt to study the effect of electromagnetic fields on the brain. The results are curious and unexpected. For example, monkeys shorten their time estimates when exposed to fields alternating about seven times a second, though the effect is much smaller at ten cycles per second. Cats were sent to sleep by waves modulated at 150 cycles/sec. and what was much odder, if they had been conditioned, it took two months to extinguish the reflex."

I just checked your profile, "PhD Atomic Physics Oregon State University ". Is that true? Boy, what a joke! Do they sell them on line too? You can tell educated people by their fruit! "Now you claimed I was simply wrong on many counts. I'm waiting." And that's the reason my post is in the trash, someone like you acting before they think. Can you read and study? I've learned that people here make in hard by deleting and moving post, but you made a claim, that I think the facts I've shared show as false. But that does not seem to matter much at this forum. If your right, I'll/we'll learn something. If I'm right, will you learn it? Now, put-up or........ keep doing whatever....... Justice Robert Jackson--"The very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." "If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein." "Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent, soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard." Isaiah 66:14 And when ye see this, your heart shall rejoice, and your bones shall flourish like an herb: and the hand of the Lord shall be known toward his servants, and his indignation toward his enemies. And you tell them their wrong, without backing it up? The rule in "Real Science" is that there is no such thing as proof, only disproof! "MAGNETRITION" Good news for some. Bad news for others. It now is shown that all lab animal experiments were flawed because the animal's need to move about in the earth's magnetic field was not taken into account. Like NASA, and all medical diagnoses up to now, something they were not aware of was playing an important part, but went unnoticed for many different reasons. With the lab animal experiments, many researchers reported seeing what they and/or their supporters wanted to see. They essentially led many into embracing their personal beliefs, or prejudices against others, by the deception of allowing their assessment to be referred to as proof. " READ THE BEST BOOKS FIRST, OR YOU MAY NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO READ THEM AT ALL." -- Thoreau Ezekiel 3:19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

From: BAL-TORR (BALTORR) Posted: 3/11/99 5:18 AM "Ok, I read this thread (all that hadn't been arbitrarily deleted), and I thought to myself "This guy could be on to something, or he could be completely wrong, I need to hear more to be sure"...Boys and girls, that's called having an open mind. Some of you guys and gals cuffed and stuffed the man for no good reason except that what he was saayin was way out, according to your frame of reference. You know that is not right. Give things a chance. I'm not sayin the guy is right or wrong, but there is really no reason to jump on him with both feet without knowing all the facts. You wouldn't do it on the street, why on a message board? I don't know if his invention or his idea works, and I may never know. Depends on if I decide to research it or not. But I wouldn't want to go down in history as one of the first to trash Fulton, Edison, or Einstein without knowin what I was talking about. You guys know I have nothin but respect and friendship for some of you. On the other hand, I don't see how you stand by and let someone who has no qualifications, scientific or otherwise, delete messages in a string that deals with this kind of subject matter. How are we to develope an opinion or learn anythuing about a possible real breakthrough, if someone who has a closed mind and NO expertise in the sciences is allowed to delete parts of the discussion? Just another reason I don't chat in Copsonline anymore...But aside from that...you guys give new ideas a chance, maybe the guy is on to something, maybe he isn't. Neither is a reason to just shut the door. Nice to talk to y'all again..Bal-torr"

Wize move. Studying would have shown it's not a game. People are suffering from this not being understood and shared. And you are one of them. If what I say is true. The struggle for equality is against the elite, no matter what name tag they wear today. Their fruits are inequality rather than equality. War, rather than peace. Are you over the age of 10? If you set up a camera, and recorded yourself during a nights sleep, would you be found moving less than you did last year? Every year? Can learning why a bird's egg must be turned during incubation double life expectancy in humans? Learn how to prevent osteoporosis, just the way children do? Arthur C. Clarke, said something like, Highly advanced technology, to us, should seem like magic. Exodus 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked. Acts 23:35 I will hear thee, said he, when thine accusers are also come. And he commanded him to be kept in Herod's judgment hall. "Without the scholar's words":doh: In my case, with my post, about Jesus and the bed, I think it ended up there, due to what you would call, or best describe as, "Galileo syndrome". A major achievement in science was accomplished back in 1985, when once again in history, an individual had a flash of insight. I speak of the theory of Magnetrition, and the way it causes correction in every person that becomes aware of it. As history has recorded, with Galileo and his discovery, the new knowledge would be beneficial to everyone, but so-called experts, in an effort to save face, begin to behave inhumanely,(not in the best interest of humanity, but instead what they perceive as their own). This flash of insight, shines light on our evolutionary history. Things we did not previously comprehend, become visible, and all paradigms are asked to become suitably accountable. The trashcan, like excommunication, is the tool used by the politician, who is now shown to have been masquerading as a scientist/scholar/humanitarian. "Darwinian medicine?" Where did that term come from? What have you been told it means, it stands for? Now, what does it mean if Jesus is famous for the bed, and everyone learns it, as they should have from reading the New Testament? If I am right? "The bed is evolutionary medicine. People that do not compensate for the height of the trees suffer health problems due to sleeping on the ground. Some agree the term "hell" means "the grave". So, getting people using raised beds is how Jesus and his followers were keeping others from an early grave." So, why have "Darwinian medicine", if Jesus already pointed it out and used the idea to heal us, and it's recorded in hishory? Why is/has history being/been asked to repeat itself, if it is already recorded as having happened, in history books as well as our lives? ~~~~~~ "Cornerstone of Human Society" "While we know that some animals can communicate with each other, in ways that are as yet little understood, we also know that man is the only living being that has developed speech. Words are symbols by means of which we can communicate our thoughts to each other. Ordered thought is impossible without a vocabulary of words. And without words there could certainly be no abstract thinking -thought not connected with the material things which we know through the senses." - Encyclopedia of Popular Science. ~~~~~~ Jesus teaching and using evolution. The reason for the bed. Politics wants it classified as religion, while it should have been in every history book for the last 2000 years, so that it could have its educational effect on everyone, like recorded history is saved in the hopes of doing. Why do you want to play politics with people's education? Why didn't you learn about Jesus and the bed in grade school? You can now see that it was an important event in "our" history, right? Are you educating/teaching all the people you know about this newly uncovered important information, and there-by allowing them to become more informed, more helpful, and wiser and better educated? Proverbs 3:11 My son, despise not the chastening of the Lord; neither be weary of his correction: Jeremiah 2:30 In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction: your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion. Jeremiah 5:3 O Lord, are not thine eyes upon the truth? thou hast stricken them, but they have not grieved; thou hast consumed them, but they have refused to receive correction: they have made their faces harder than a rock; they have refused to return. Jeremiah 7:28 But thou shalt say unto them, This is a nation that obeyeth not the voice of the Lord their God, nor receiveth correction: truth is perished, and is cut off from their mouth. 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: Alan Search + Share ~ Magnetrition Jesus, Galileo, and many others did so. Or do you think they didn't know what they were doing, getting into? People trying to create such a thread is what will/has advance US in knowledge, through the ages. If your afraid of going in the trash-can, the politician has done his job. And it is a bad sign of the times. "WHO SO WOULD BE A MAN, MUST BE A NON-CONFORMIST" "WHAT A BLIND-MAN'S BLUFF, IS THIS GAME OF CONFORMITY" "FOR NON-CONFORMITY, THE WORLD WHIPS YOU WITH ITS DISPLEASURE" "IT IS EASY IN THE WORLD, TO LIVE AFTER THE WORLD'S OPINION" "THE PICTURE WAITS FOR MY VERDICT" "A TRUE MAN IS THE CENTER OF THINGS" "TO BE GREAT IS TO BE MISUNDERSTOOD" "IF I PERCEIVE A THREAT, MY CHILD WILL SEE IT AFTER ME" "YOUR CONFORMITY EXPLAINS NOTHING" "THE PERSONS WHO MAKE UP A NATION TODAY, NEXT YEAR DIE" "NOTHING CAN BRING YOU PEACE, BUT BY THE TRIUMPH OF PRINCIPLES" "ONE MUST BE AN INVENTOR TO READ WELL. WHEN THE MIND IS BRACED BY LABOR AND INVENTION, THE PAGE OF WHATEVER BOOK WE READ BECOMES LUMINOUS WITH THE MANIFOLD ILLUSION. EVERY SENTENCE IS DOUBLY SIGNIFICANT, AND THE SENSE OF OUR ARTHUR IS AS BROAD AS THE WORLD" - R.W. EMERSON The diary of Samuel Pepys 1667- 1669. It was a book on tape I got from the library. I recorded the part that tells of his brother passing out. In the diary Samuel describes the account as him "falling down all along the ground dead, which gave me a great fright." He meant not conscious. Could the idea be going over "your" head, because you've had it in the political sand? Maybe you're just not up to real thinking? An experiment. A simple test. "When I ask a group of students, "Who's famous for the car?" they say "Ford", then I ask, "Who's famous for the light bulb?" they say "Edison", then I ask, "Who's famous for the bed?" and most are stumped, and say they never thought about it, but once in a while a person in a group will quickly say/guess Jesus. And when I ask why they say that, they say, "Because of the manger!"." Those that think maybe I could be on to something, try asking people the questions I have been asking. It has taken me years to have about 10 people say Jesus, without help/clues. But, if people give up trying to guess, tell them some guy says Jesus was, and see what they say. Its there, in our history, I had a man about 60-70 say "manger" a few weeks back. I've been lead to it by the stories, and tested for it in the educational memory of others. And you can tell when some people realize it's right, but then try to act as if they didn't see it in their thoughts. Not able to be politically incorrect in their thinking, in public. >"I claim you are crazy because not ONE historian agrees with you." This is a joke, right? But you have to study instead, to be educated, and have any personal understanding. "Where's Harrison Ford??? This must be Blade Runner." - Altered State

It's humor, right, but how bout doing some science. I've studied/researched it for more than 20 years! Many "books" say what I said. I have a new idea as to its function. And claim it's a matter of life and death for people. One hit on wikipedia is not research, is it? I'm not talking about my spelling maybe being wrong. Althought it would help me. I've tried to up-grade at wikipedia, some political writer from Washington, playing mod kept dumping my add ons. No kind-of review or anything. Now you claimed I was simply wrong on many counts. I'm waiting. From your reply, I take it I did not miss it earlier.

It's humor, right, but how bout doing some science. I've studied/researched it for more than 20 years! Many "books" say what I said. I have a new idea as to its function. And claim it's a matter of life and death for people. One hit on wikipedia is not research, is it? I'm not talking about my spelling maybe being wrong. Althought it would help me. I've tried to up-grade at wikipedia, some political writer from Washington, playing mod kept dumping my add ons. No kind-of review or anything. Now you claimed I was simply wrong on many counts. I'm waiting. From your reply, I take it I did not miss it earlier.

Paranoid conclusion? My posts were not moved, and one locked? I was given an infraction of 7 for advertising. And told what I shared was Bull XXXX! I 've posted/shared on other forums alot, first time to have my new posts, not look like their new. And I can tell politics at work. Anyone that studies can. Psalms 119:150 They draw nigh that follow after mischief: they are far from thy law. Psalms 120:3 What shall be given unto thee? or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? Well, that's why I shared them. Did I miss where you backed up your claim of me being "simply" wrong? I'm sorry if I missed it, where was it hidden/moved to? Psalms 119:61 The bands of the wicked have robbed me: but I have not forgotten thy law.

The facts show that is not true. Well, I can't get feed-back if the topic is locked. Without discussion, how can scientific merit be determined? I put the topic where others with that interest would go, and someone moves them to the trash, or under non-science discussions. Science is made to be only politics, when correction is blocked. Science shows, not tells, others what to leave out. You don't seem to have learned that. And that's my point. Your way leads to us all being left ignorant. Religion without science is blind, Science without religion is lame. -Albert Einstein History without science is blind, Science without History is lame. -Alan E. Jackson John 7:38 - He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water."

Maybe? The facts show it has not been, for me. Others? Should it be? Yes, surely! Without it, people keep thinking their right, when correction could have educated us all. Without freedom of speech, all you have is people playing politics, making themselves look good, while keeping the turth from correcting them. That is not "Science", and that's not real learning! Job 21:14 Yet they say to God, Depart from us, For we do not desire the knowledge of Your ways. PS. My new posts get added to the old ones, now. Boy, you people just have not got a clue. But you've got the power to block others, while you act like your right. Sick puppies, acting like they know science! Smart people not allowed to play too! Well, I was looking for education, not a political camp!

I have not been back to this forum for a while, because the topics I posted were moved, and one was put in the trash, for no good reason! Ignorance and bias the only reason I can see. And then I was told I was selling something, which was/is not true. This is not good judgement on the part of mods, for sure, in my case. My "Jesus and the bed" post was trashed, yet I get replies form those that study and little which are good; <Before the word sleep became part of our vocabulary, the word dead was used, meaning not conscious. The word dead covered all the conditions for being found not conscious. People 2000 years ago, not yet having the word sleep, would have described what the carpenter Jesus was doing as raising the dead. With hindsight, through the study of history, we can now see and understand that Jesus was raising the sleeping, by giving them beds. The manger, praying before going to bed, and the spread of furniture with Christianity, all points to Jesus being responsible mass utilization of the bed.... Of course! He WAS a Carpenter! I find that the purported etymology of the words discussed is very intriguing, to say the least. I'll always remember these "raising the dead" images, when I hear regular preaching, from now on. This is the funniest thing I've read in a couple of days! Thanks ala! ~~~~~~~~~ Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:08 pm FFT Moderator "This is the best miracle apologetic I've ever seen." I had to use the dictionary to try to figure out the meaning behind that sentence. apolo[getic adj. 5Fr apolog=tique < LL(Ec) apologeticus < Gr apologctikos, suitable for defense. 1 defending in writing or speech; vindicating 2 showing realization of and regret for a fault, wrong, etc.; making an apology. n. a formal defense, often written, of a belief, cause, etc. I take it to mean something like: This is the best miracle defense I've ever seen. This is the best miracle explanation I've ever seen. ~~~~~~ I post these topics that I'm studying to get feed back, and here, the post gets trashed and locked. The facts show mods here need to take more time looking into what they do. Justice Hugo Black-- "Freedom to speak and write about public questions is as important to the life of government as is the heart of the human body. In fact, this privilege is the heart of our government! If that heart be weakened, the result is debilitation; if it be stilled, the result is death." If a man can convince me that I do not think or act right, gladly will I change, for I search after truth. But he is harmed who abideth on still in his ignorance. - Marcus Aurelius