gimel

it is argued by colin leslie dean that no matter how faultless godels logic is Godels incompleteness theorem are invalid ie illegitimate for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility- which is invalid ie illegitimate,he constructs impredicative statement which is invalid ie illegitimate ,he cant tell us what makes a mathematic statement true, he falls into two self-contradictions,he ends in three paradoxes http://www.scribd.com/doc/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-inva... http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/gamahucher_press_catalogue.htm http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf First of the two self-contradictions GODEL CAN NOT TELL US WHAT MAKES A STATEMENT TRUE

read ramsey lips and note- he said nothing when godel used it AND NOTE

The Australian philosopher colin leslie dean points out Godels theorem is invalid because it uses invalid axioms ie axiom of reducibility it is the biggest fraud in mathematical history everything dean has shown was known at the time godel did his proof but no one meantioned any of it http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf look godel used the 2nd ed of PM he says note he says he is going to use AR but Russell following wittgenstien took it out of the 2nd ed due to it being invalid godel would have know that russell and wittgenstien new godel used it but said nothing ramsey points out AR is invalid before godel did his proof godel would have know ramseys arguments ramsey would have known godel used AR but said nothing every one knew AR was invalid they all knew godel used it but nooooooooooooo one said -or has said anything for 76 years untill dean the theorem is a fraud the way godel presents it in his proof it is crap