Jump to content

UserX

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by UserX

  1. Wish i could, my chosen profession is project management. I would love to be able run the numbers..if i could lol . or knew some1 who could. This theory excites me and would love to work with some1 on it.
  2. Hello I am UserX, I am not a scientist and do not claim to know everything. But I do love science and in particular physics. My theories are based on based on science we can see and observe and it attempts to piece together things that elude us. My thought is that some time scientist are to close to the problem and that it takes a fresh mind to point out a something that could be helpful. This is a work in progress and I would like people who see the possibilities with this theory to test and critique anything I say here so that i can continue to develop these theories. The fabric of space time has always been a mystery to me. How it worked, what it actually was and the effects it has on mass, gravity and life itself. I began to formulate a theory after reading countless articles and watching many,many Docs on the subjects.I studied what Einstein wroteabout the curvature of space time and developed this. The fabric of space is a substance that exists in multiple dimensions. In our dimensions (universe) space exists as formed energy (the best way i can explain it) that influences mass and energy in our dimension. In others dimensions it may be more solid or water like but it exist in all dimensions. It easier to imagine it like a three dimensional grid. Almost like the the popular pictures of Einstein’s space time, but instead of a 1 dimensional fabric it is 3 dimensions and the fabric/substance/energy of space passes through mass in our dimension but still effects the fabric like Einstein predicted To imagine its affect on mass think of a 2 d painting, to create the painting you need a surface and the paint (materials) now imagine space as the surface for a celestial object lets say earth. the greater the density/rotation/size (haven't worked out the math on this) an object has the more it distorts the space fabric. Simple straight forward been said before. but where mine differ is that the greatest distortion of this fabric occurs at the center of the object. So imaging the grid again and then imagine an asteroid in space by it self it distorts space only a bit. but since every object in space is intimately connected by the fabric of space smaller objects could be pushed toward the center of the asteroid or celestial body like earth. Remember that one toy 2 long ropes a ball with a hole for the ropes in the middle when 1 kid pulls the rope apart the ball goes toward the other kid this is how gravity works in my theory. Everything in our know universe exists on and within this 3 d fabric and the fabric exists within everything and every one as our canvas. So if we are in close proximity of an object (like earth or a planet/sun) we are actually pushed toward the center of the space distortion created by the object. (like the game). The ropes being space the ball the object under the influence of gravity and the person closest to the ball the object twisting/distorting space the person at the wide end of the ropes is the effect or energy that causes the push. If this theory is correct this could explain many things. The missing mass of the universe (dark matter,dark energy) quantum mechanics The mechanics of a black hole, and why stars travel at the same speed around the center of a galaxy no matter how far away from the center they are Information transfer over seemingly empty space Electromagnetism Wormholes etc.. Science is not science if its not observable and/or testable. My observations that go along with this theory can be seen on a scale of our solar system. The sun and the planets spin “naturally” in the same direction and orbit in the same direction, a couple rotate in the opposite direction (retrograde) but orbit the sun in the same direction as the other planets. In my theory the fabric of the universe works as a great conductor of energy waves. So the energy/motion of the sun can actually work to roll the planets along ( remembering that in this theory the sun an all the planet are connected on this grid of space) so as the sun spins energy waves carried by the fabric works similar to how sound can push objects. While the space distortion keeps planets locked orbiting almost close to the center or equator (if i may) of the sun energy from the sun helps the planet along its orbit. The planets themselves (as well as the sun) spins and actually pulls itself through the fabric of space grabbing a piece of space pulling it through its center and releasing it from the back side while the sun keeps it steady and help it along. My theory can account for why so called dead planet spin slower that active ones. Take Mars for example, Mars is roughly half the size (presumed mass) of Earth and geologically dead meaning it core does not rotate like that of an active planet. If it were active its days should last around 12 hours and it solar orbit should be about 2/3rd s of earth but it rotation is close to the same and it solar orbit is about twice as long. In my theory this is the effect of the fabric/energy of space. Less rotation at its core = less space distortion= less pull on the fabric thus slower orbits and rotation. I understand most theories seem far fetched to people who strictly believe one thing or another. After reading this give it some thought point out the obvious even test it if you possess the facilities. My theories are not based on bias notions or ignorant one sided vision but are actually well thought out concepts rooted in things we know to be true but just cant explain. If correct this theory, when completed could help to unify the sciences. Please keep an open mind, i can take criticism but pleas make it constructive. Throwing out the whole theory because I got something wrong is not constructive remember this is a work in progress and I am actually reaching out for help to develop this. Thank you User X P.S. I am developing a few other theories, my next one will be on time and how it exists as a byproduct of decay.( pls excuse any typos )
  3. yes ty I know good point but i was actually talking about thought as an energy wave not electrochemical. Its just a concept Im not backing it up and the poster asked for possibilities in principles not stated facts. There are a few articles about this on the net. like information transfer being faster than light and that what thought waves are information transfer. Thank you for your comments http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080813/full/news.2008.1038.html X
  4. Some say thought travels faster than the speed of light. So if our brains can some how process thought waves then it could manifest itself in a virus like way. For instance mob mentality. Look at whats happening in Europe and the middle east. Spontaneous violent mobs arise from people who don't usualy act in such a manner. In this case/theory all it would take is a group of individuals with bad intentions/thoughts to make a a crowd of people react in a similar manner to the hosts. This "mob mentality” has been documented many times. In most cases people who have no intent on causing damage or destruction are pulled into the mob. Recently (the mobs in England) a child was asked why he joined the mob he answered that he didn't know. So there may be an underlying mental effect that we don't understand. It’s a known fact that as we “evolved” we lost some of our basic senses, or at least the ability to use them in a fine capacity like many animals do today. We know that in our bodies our mind causes chemical reaction to stimuli (pheromones, testosterone, etc.) If thoughts travel on waves like other energy does then it not a far stretch to envision these thought pattern waves physically effecting someone else. The study of twins sheds more light on that subject. also see mob mentality. We are so inhibited by what we are told we cant do that we fail to strive for the impossible. X
  5. What is the best unification theory to date?

  6. I think scientist need to go back to the drawing boards and rework earlier theories to function with all the new information we have. People discover new things all the time but fruitlessly try to jam it into models of popular theories. I’m not saying popular theories are wrong, I’m saying we need to incorporate new knowledge (things we know to be true) into older theories. Stop inventing things so you can make new discoveries fit. Look at things in a different light (so to speak). This is the reason why scientist cant mold the concrete theory of everything. I believe the answers are right in front of us we just have to ask the right questions. X
  7. Its way to early to make bold predictions about these findings. A lot of research will have to be done, this is the essence of science. Anything else is just theory. X
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.