KUKTLE

Well I'm not a major in Math or Physics so I probably wouldn't even know where to begin with finding formulae to describe my through so I guess it'll never be credible.

Yes you are correct the clock does more slower we've gotten that across, but when a clock is moving slower its aging slower making time outside seem to move faster. This is why if you travel at the speed of light you end up in future and instead of barely had moved through time at all. Though I would appreciate it if you could explain to me everything in my theory that is flawed. If that wouldn't bother you that is.

I've studied quantum physics and cosmology as a long with many other sciences and from everything they say my theory would be correct. It can even be added to string theory and if accepted instead of laughed at and the onlooker had an open mind to research for not even an hour, they wouldn't be able to find anything that would disprove this. This also does answer many questions people have about the universe. It's nearly impossible to have evidence for this without being able to split an atom and watching it in slow motion, which is impossible for us at the moment. I'm just saying there's nothing out there that proves this wrong. It agrees with all physics, I don't know why no one has ever thought of it before. Okay thank you for the informative response, now what kind of predictions can I make to validate this theory? The only thing I can think of is to watch the behavior of an atom split, not much else. The whole time thing is already in modern science and well accepted I just did my description backwards is all.

Okay well thank you for correcting my miswording. Yes the clock inside the satellite would actually tick at a slower rate, but the time around the satellite would stay at the same pace so the satellite is still moving faster through time, just with a slower clock. Yes I also had my speed of a satellite wrong. But could you come up with any evidence that says the big bang came from an atom (or molecule) is physically impossible? Could you come up with the evidence saying that the universe would live and die in less then a second than the universe above it would be irrational? Could you come up with evidence to say that if we were to destroy an atom (or molecule) then there's no possible chance it would be logical to create a universe within its area? Thank you for making some corrections I made that I didn't word properly and you are correct and I know that, but still no one has said any kind of evidence that this wouldn't be possible.

There's several ways to move faster through time, the key element is to "cover" more time. Either by being more massive or reaching such a great speed that your covering more time per second. A satellite travels at about 17,000 MPH, at this speed with several weeks of orbit the satellites clock will be 2-3 minutes ahead of our clocks on earth. so you cover time by size and by speed, this isn't a very delicate procedure though. You must be either extremely massive or be moving extremely fast to notice any kind of difference.

This affect has been noticed by astronauts, they've actually sent clocks into space in orbit and they've noticed that when they return to earth the clock that was in space is about 3 - 8 seconds further in time. Traveling through time is not very sensitive at all so if you travel to the moon and say it did pas through time at a slower or faster rate then when you come back to earth the difference would be in minutes at most but very unlikely to be that much. So it wouldn't be noticed by your own perception unless you hit speeds that we have yet to achieve.

We all have a mechanism in our brains that perceives time for our conscience. This continues to vary and change as you live. Sometimes it slows down, sometimes it speeds up. I'm sorry no offense to anyone but could someone please make a comment that can actually help my theory? Or even help disprove it? So far it's just been a bunch of crap that's nearly useless/pointless.

Yes this also agrees with my theory, I apologize for wording it incorrectly. I said your moving faster through time, meaning time is ticking at a faster rate making it slower for you. The whole time slow and fast factor always gets my tongue in a not sometimes.

Well you wouldn't be able to find anything that would have anything to do with my theory honestly. What I've done is put a puzzle together and I'm not entirely sure what it is that you say disagrees with my theory. Though I'm not a college student, I do this more as a hobby of interest. Also may I say that you didn't give me any information of that disagrees with this. A lot of my basis also comes from educational science shows. so I guess I could add a link from youtube if I'm capable of finding them. But remember I'm asking for information that could entirely put my theory out of the question.

When you have another universe it cannot interfere or interact with another. With the multi-verse they stand on different frequencies. Kind of like a radiowave, these waves pass through eachother but have no effect on one another. You're listening to 91.3 and only here the signal from 91.3 This is not exactly proven but it's what I come to terms to, to make sense.

Sorry though I wouldn't agree (just my opinion) though check out my recent post. It's also about the big bang Sorry though I wouldn't agree (just my opinion) though check out my recent post. It's also about the big bang

#1 - The Creation of Our Universe I begin with agreeing with The Big Bag Theory, But with a little addition. The universe used to be an atom but more than likely a molecule, one mostly made of Hydrogen and that contains all the elements that we know of today. How this molecule was arranged and what it made leaves every man clueless. For know I'm just going to refer to it as an atom. So at one time our universe was an atom, something extremely dense (like an atom), something with the strongest force known that pulled in to keep itself together (like an atom). This atom was split, then then created our universe and changing the physics all around it. From such the strongest force that mankind has ever made to happen, think of what would be going on at the atomic level within the area. For this to happen it would itself stretch time and space and continue to do so until the force from the explosion died off. This would create the vaccum of space. The immense pressure would also massively puncture time space and create massive black holes then form galaxies. "But how did it explode?" No one is entirely sure, but an atom is such a stable object that it is against the laws of physics for it to split on its own. There MUST be another force to act upon it in order for a split to occur. Think of it, our universe is an atom to an entirely different universe and the scale repeats and continues, its infinite. This scale goes infinitely bigger and infinitely smaller. So how you can create a universe is by splitting an atom. #2 - Time You might have thought, "well if an atom explodes then it would just explode and massively separate too quickly for any life to exist. Because if i were to split an atom then everything it was made of would just transform energies or perish" Right? This is how it works. Here's an example if you were to spit an atom then you would create a universe that lived and died within less then a second of your life, but if you were to be living inside of that universe you created then it would take probly several billions of years for it to live and die for you. "How is that possible for time to move so fast for the person who split the atom but for you time goes massively slower?" Well let me explain this, Time is actually something that surrounds and takes up space and is intertwined with space very well. Every time you move your moving through time, time is also an object constantly in motion. Our galaxy, our solar sytem and our planet is constantly in motion. Meaning that it is nearly impossible to stop the clock of time. The faster you run the faster you go through time. Also the bigger you are the more you go through time because your covering more space, which makes you cover more time. So if you were in the universe that is above us you would be in a completely different Time Dimension (This is the only term I can think to call it but I don't find it to be an accurate name). Time would flow extremely different for the universe that created our universe. There's higher Time dimensions and lower Time dimensions. In the smaller Time dimension time flows alot slower then our time and in a higher Time dimension time would flow alot faster then ours. And how you enter a different time dimension would recquire the technology able to bend space so much in order to enter a higher level, which would be the only way to really know what created out universe. You would see the exact second what made the atom split. -------------- Let me know what you think, I've never been able to find any factual information that disagrees with my theory. The only thing is in a previous debate with a physicist claimed that this would be impossible according to E=MC2. Well if Alberts theory is correct then The Big Bang Thoery would have been out of the question a long time ago. So this doesn't make sense to me and either there's a hole in my theory or Alberts. Let me now if you can find flaws, I've studied chemistry, particle physics, cosmology and a couple others and I've never been able to find something that didn't completely agree with this theory.