TheProphet

Weel we don't real know for shure what our "feelings" are - acording to me - so that's why i feel suspicious.

I haven't had it for years!

To me it looks like a paradox.. If we change someting in the past it - acording to my view - would change the future! If what danny says dosen't happen then the past and the future have no real connection. If i were to send something back to me, that i have in possesion in the future, i would end upp with the same object in the future too, but this time it would come from the past but sent from the same future... So when i send it back to me, and my past me hangs it on the wall, it must correclty apear on my future wall too. If not our current understanding - or mine - is not enough.

A such smart AI might become dangerous, since it would think like us or even more advanced and with less "feelings". Especielly if it learned that it were being used so that humans wouldn't need too work. Another problem with such an AI would be that i would make that Human carmechanic out of a jobb. I belive that we don't need to take away humans jobb, but instead use robots were can't - or were it is to hazardous - go.

The neat thing is there already exist prediciting theorys that imply that time, as far as we can se it -1 dimensional then-, is a manifastaion of a 3 dimensional time. I blive this theory was put forth in Scientific american around 2003-2004. Interesting reading but i don,t remember the the articles name nor the scientist/s involved. And it supossed to be around planck scale and beyond that this real 3d time is being put in the lime light =)

adsorption? neverheard of that please more info Swansont!

Luke: The phenomena u describes is called Lorentz contraction. And form an observer u will become thinner, altough u won't be able to measure it yourselve! And u will also only contract in the direction u are traveling. A recent description i did read was that Gravity is a manifestation of time. when ut lift something out of a gravity field u lift it out of time. i bleive it was Penrose (not shure though) that mentioned this. Sorry for the bad description, but Penrose indeed mentioned this due to GR indicates this. Someone else might further emphasize this.

Since my view on light is as it is, that light can't lose energy in that way. Becasue of the fact, to me, that light only travels in zero time hence no loss of energy in your example. It can deviate time back and forth, but this effect always cancels out in the big picture. And for Dark matter we are already getting in elementary particles like the neutrino for example. That before was tought as a "sister" of the Photons and as being massless. But later research oscilations in neutrinos which indicate a small mass. From what i have read neutrinos might well be filling up alot of space, altough this is hard to measure with a particle that has a very low interaction with "common" matter. Another candidate and one i find very likely and heavy is the Black holes, i belive we have experimentel evidence(do we?, hard to keep track here since everbody writes about them as a matter of fact). These bastards might well constitute a big bunch of all the missing heavy weight champs out there! Gravitons are one two, altough here i know extremly little about(if these even exists).

5614: After a Pion decays it produces an Electron - Positron pair. Which in turn are entagnled in the decay! There are no ions (positiv or negatic atoms, which u already know) or for that instance atoms involved in the process swansont describes! Just a Pion. Whom is an elementeray particle, and should not be in any way related to atoms ions.. A Pion decays in a e- and p+.

I did indeed read upp on a test where the new Athlon, i belive it was the FX, the new beat the crap put of a double 2ghz G5! But i'll try to seek the source out for you since i don't have all figures in fresh! One test with cinebench: http://barefeats.com/g5c.html (here with Intel, AMD and G5) One more with G5:s against AMD: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112749,pg,8,00.asp Interesting info on future AMD CPU:s (read it!) http://www.kirupaforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-37045.html That's al for now.. judge yourselve! I love my frinds OS X... but not the inzane prize he bought a darn old G3 for....

If the Particles are truly entangeled what u say here won't happen.

Further more COBE:s meseurments indeed supports the Big Bang theory, much due to the horizon problem that i most shurely belive COBE did see... but my memory isn't frech on that specifik point.

In reply to Whom?

As Hawking argues in a book with Penrose, the Nature of Space and time, he indeed emphasize the following point: Let me further explain something till i get to the point though. Big Bang = Our univere has/is emerging out of a Singularity. If so holds then there is not true, or atleast in this case, (acording to Hawking) that u with the laws in your example, Lukis, can rule out it's own existence. Since in a singularity the laws of our known world/space laes simply breakdown and become useles.. And what u describe in Law of Kinetic Energy. It's aplies to atoms.. in a singularity there is propably no such thing as atoms.. Photons at it's best.. And this we can direclty observe from COBE:s observations. Which today is the foundation for cosmology. But i wouldn't argue against your point that the Big Bang might just be an illusion. And regarding the Law of Energy Conversion: this theory is quite old and i find it most unexatable to be used in a medium/space of which we know nothing about.. If now something indeed did emerge out of nothing.. then it might just have been so simple; so that there wasn't nothing in the first place! But here we catch ourselves even harder to check what nothing outside our something is all about.. Even worse than trying to show of strings, in which point i find myselve neutral. Cosmic Infaltion i simple woun't comment.. still find this theory a little fuzzy..sd altough i bet those cosmologist have rather neat facts for there theories...

If it's transportation via 2 universes i see no law breaking! We now of blackholes too be a mather of fact. White holes on the other han is still just constructs of our thoughts, i haven't read about any discovery yet. But please direct me to the article where they have!

Since we not really know what exactly a blackhole is.. it's just speculations. Rather good ones though! And from what i have read, mosty Penrose and Hawking. A blackhole inside another blackhole is in the way u describe it, indeed impossible. A Neutron star wouldn't pass into a blackhole, it will be absorbed. A blackhole that merges with another would follow the easy math 1+1=1

I'll translate it tomorrow... For those whom know Swedish your goodie but else... reason why not now.. well Red wine and translation... nahhh

Yes but still we must with the knowledge at hand try to understand the "traveling at c point" effects! Don't u think? Altough it messes bad with my mind (as u might see from my few responses). I shall scan an experiment showing one of these "Ghost" effects experiments later and hand it upp here! Give me a moment...

Thales: Amen ! After reading K.C. Coles ; First you build a cloud. (more accuratly she rewrote it) I most truly hold the same ground as Thales so deligthfully described! Another of Einsteins words where: everything should be made as simple as possbile, but no simpler. Which to me clrearly states that imagination first then theory. And last Math to prove it with. Not the other way around. Altough that where Einsteins way of working SR out.. but he did had an idea first of what to seek for! So there's always a point to discuss and speculate your selve to sleep! Since most of what we know of today are aproximations, so one should always question the existed! Cheers

Well to be honest i really like Our sun the best! It's indeed the only one i really feel need some creed too =D

Thales: Let me put it this way! Light don't come to a halt due to Getting one of the 4 dimensions to stop. To me Light will still be able to travel all 3 spatial(do one say so?) dimensions but not time*. Time don't pass, but since the Photons still is traveling at c and only can travel att c they will keep moving in it's direction and in Space but not time! Since SR says that c is the limit and that at c Time halts. But i wouldn't say that u should aply moire of SR:s effect to this than the above statement. Since all other SR effects involve mater (might be on shallow ice here, i know ) And i also find Light specific abilitys to be somewhat go hand in hand with all the benefits of traveling att c. Once created you are! Nothing can really happen to you, or atleast until you interact again. Just like the perfect energy bearer it really is! *Altough indications say that even light deviate time upp and down a tad. But to in the Long run Cancel out eachothers differences. Slightly speculative altough said by Bigger names than me. All for now folks, need some sleep now!