ydoaPs

He was clearly either six years old or near the same mental capabilities of Klaynos.

The Mythbusters actually just tested this(using guns!). You may be able to find the clip on YouTube.

....sure...

[12:30] <Jesus> shut up yahweh, you're not my real father [12:31] <Yahweh> Jesus, I am your Father...search your feelings....you know it to be true

But I lost my green dot :'(

VitaminD might work, but I don't know if you could have it do that.

Her moderator speak is in purple...........her pwny speak is normal

You only think that because you've been brainwashed to believe it!

You might have a distorted view of sex. It's easy not to like it when it involves vagina dentata:

o.O You might be doing it wrong.

Based on the discussion at one of the largest Christian discussion forums, it seems that most people don't know about it and those Christians who do are divided.

What kind of rainwater collection system? As long as it's not hooked up to the plumbing, you shouldn't need any sort of permit. It's essentially a bucket.

[16:35] * UnintentionalChaos disregards that and gets back to ****ing Sylar's mother [16:36] <Sylar> you're so desperate that you'd put in the effort to dig up a corpse? [16:36] <Sylar> wow [16:37] <UnintentionalChaos> I dug her up months ago [16:37] <javagamer> O_O [16:42] <Gilded> Did someone say coprophilia? [16:42] <Gilded> Oh, apparently not Even with the evidence provided in this thread, gilded still isn't quite as creepy as kleinwolf

more general creepiness

I was wondering about that myself. I thought the only alteration to the test itself was the green highlighting of certain words(just like how Jesus's words are highlighted in red in some versions).

It's out at the end of this month(Oct 27) on DVD and digital download. It will air on SyFy in 2010. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1286130/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlestar_Galactica:_The_Plan

[08:24] <Gilded> It's not gay if the balls aren't touching

Who said anything about atheists or outrage?

That's not what they're doing. It's being edited to remove "liberal bias" and "socialism." How is that more accurate? They're taking out things such as "ye without sin cast the first stone" and "father, forgive them for they know not what they do." They're changing "rich [person]" to "idle miser". In what sense can anyone consider what they're doing intellectually honest, let alone more accurate? They're starting with KJV. When they run into something they don't like (such as helping the poor), they turn to the greek to retranslate the crap out or they selectively use the liberal art of textual criticism to find any reason to claim that the passage in question was not original. For years, they've been twisting the words of the Bible to support their ideology; now, they're doing it literally.

I can't find any conservative blogs talking about it. It's as though they don't even know about it. edit: And more from the talk page(it's a fun read):

From the talk page:

At least they're not trying to hide that their motive is that since they're unwilling to have political ideology actually in line with the Bible, they want to change the Bible to be in line with their political ideology.

Except for the "liberal bias"; that get's changed. Wow. They're also removing the "Adulteress Story" due to "liberal bias". For those of you who don't know, that's the one with "Ye without sin cast the first stone."

All I can say is wow. It's just so bizzare that it almost has to be a Poe. The thing is, though, conservapedia is "serious" rather than parody. Could someone be pulling a prank on them? Possibly, but I don't know how likely that is. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedThe "Conservative Bible" can be found here.