ydoaPs

I want to see the sequel. [hide]I don't see them succeeding in rebuilding earth. Since they are a bunch of obese vegetables with no engineering skills trying to restart agriculture using one plant.[/hide] And that fire extinguisher lasted WAY too long.

Pete, it seems odd that you would be correct when every physicist here disagrees with you about physicists' usage of relativistic mass.

Not to mention complete annihilation would be indistinguishable from emitting NOTHING AT ALL and thus would NOT be emitting a shadow.

We're all gonna die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /me runs frantically

[acr=quoted for truth]qft[/acr]

It's a more even effect than trying for interference and it's easier.

It's very simple. Step one: Get a flashlight. Step two: Don't put batteries in it.

No, that's not what he said. So, you want to emit a shadow. What is this shadow? IIRC, there's no such thing as a shadowon.

It really didn't need expanding.

Please tell me it has nothing to do with the film. The film was utter rubbish.

The real question you should be asking yourselves is how I became an option in the poll at all. /me slowly backs away

Does it have to be sciencey or can it be an hour about how awesome ydoaPs is?

/me blinks Uh....so, trying thumb drive first.

Like an ethernet cable? I don't have one. I guess I could try that.

Doesn't really help me with my MacBook Pro. I tried using my iPod as a flash drive, but my other computer wouldn't recognize it. I found the library on the computer's files(both of them, actually), though. I'll try getting a cheap thumb drive.

I recently got a new laptop. Is there any way to get all my music from iTunes on my old laptop to my new laptop, or am I out of luck? You'd think there would at least be a record of what you purchased from apple.

Use Irc!!!!!!!!!

Apparently not

There's a reason we use TWO shields. You could totally place such a device outside of the primary shield. Sure it will be less efficient, but the ease in maintenance would win. Which would a company choose, cheaper(and longer lasting) or more efficient but shorter lived with more expensive maintenance?

I think that's pretty much convention too.

How close are you talking? Inside the reactor vessel?

Your posts still imply that you are thinking there is an absolute reference frame. Velocity of objects differs with respect to different refference frames. Thus their kinetic energy varies as well.

I suggest a 2000 post minimum to play.

Maybe that 500 gallons of fuel was used for the train to maintain its position by fighting friction.