ydoaPs

does your perpetual motion machine work?

reduce them, yes, but is it possible to remove them?

when i was writing out the triangles, everything but the f(b) cancelled out. can you tell me if i have the right answer?

hence the fixing. i'll fix that. don't you usually use equally spaced intervals? why?

you could always say you just started a fight club.

the formula was in general that's why i fixed it after your first post. hence the interval being factored out. that's what the [math]\frac{b-a}{n}[/math] is.

no, b meant the same thing. i just wasn't thinking when i did the LaTeX. the one value that is divided by two is due to the triangles. edit: i didn't have f(a) in there because in my problem, f(a)=0. i should have factored that in. edit#2: [math]\frac{b-a}{n}(f(a)+f(x_1)+f(x_2)+f(x_3)+...+{\frac{1}{2}}f(b))[/math]

I just got back from taking the final exam for my Calc 1 class. I did pretty well on it. The only question I wasn't sure about was the last one. It was a trapezoidal rule problem. I completely spaced how to do it. I drew the graph and divided it into sections. I drew the trapezoids. I then broke the trapezoids into triangles and rectangles. I found the areas of all triangles and rectangles then added them togather. It was y=x2 from 0 to 2 with 4 trapezoids and I got 2.688(i think). I think I ended up doing it the right way, but in a longer form. When i got home, I derived the formula for what I did. [math]\frac{b-a}{n}(f(x_1)+f(x_2)+f(x_3)+{\frac{1}{2}}f(b))[/math] where n is the number of trapezoids. Did I even come close?

here we go

it's water. i don't remember exactly why it happens, though.

LOL Try talkorigins' date=' bjaminwood. These two pages should take you a while to get through. I can almost guaruntee every piece of "evidence" against evolution you find at AIG is refuted on talkorigins.

we can see farther than 6000 light years. that wasn't hard.

i can't figure out level four. i think it has something to do with the two different titles and the fact that you click on a flashlight to go to the login thing.

i was thinking that one side would always face the sun. that's what I said. he started talking nonsense about a semi-physical flywheel.

are you sure?

if we assumed the earth just stopped spinning, it wouldn't plummit into the sun.

we are assuming the verse does not assume the sun revolves around the earth.

You apparently didn't look at the link. We are discussing the physical implications of the sun stopping in the middle of the sky.

yes. that is what the situation is talking about.

here, i'm trying to discuss with revprez the physical implications of the sun standing still. am i missing anything? how large would this force be? what would it do? is what revprez says even possible?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html

around here, it consists of "males have genetalia. females have genetalia. males insert their genetalia into the female's. nine months later, the female gives birth." there were no explainations of positions or anything.

iirc, they don't even do that for heterosexual sex.

we don't need another thread for that.