ydoaPs

you're not one of those pr0n bots, are you?

indeed such as? really? what about the several species that can see IR and/or UV? iirc, octopi don't have lenses in their eyes.

if you mean creator in the literal biblical sense, you haven't looked very hard.

and that answers the question how? edit: btw, my "faith" is supported by facts and evidence. yours is based on an ancient collection of writings that is inconsistant both internally and externally.

if god doesn't need a creator, why does the universe?

for the first one, use [math]v={\lambda}f[/math] where [math]{\lambda}[/math] is the wavelength and f is the frequency. also, T-1=f where T is the period. for the second, you'll need the formula for the speed of sound, but i don't know it off the top of my head.

do it logarithmically. y=(sin(x))x ln(y)=xln(sin(x)) i think you can get it from there.

there's still a constant, it is just a different one. you get .5tan2(x)+C. they get .5sec2(x)+C'. the answers are identicle. C and C' differ by .5.

you remind me of a poster in one of my teachers' classrooms. it says "you miss 100% of the shots you don't take."

tartaglia already said....... tan2(x)+1=sec2(x)

how far in maths do you have to go until log goes from log10 to loge?

they why teach no specified base as base 10 at lower levels? why use ln notation at all?

so, if we redefine "myth" to mean something besides "myth", then we all believe in "myth"s?

just as much, if not more than, the christians. they're just not a s vocal in our part of the world. surf about online, though, and you'll see.

you answered yourself

then why refer to the UFO crowd with a condescending tone, but not the Christian IDiots? it doesn't belong in philosophy class any more than it does science. it is religion. religion!=philosophyphilosophy asks questions; religion is preconceived answers that must be taken by faith and are not to be questioned. ID is clearly the latter. no, there's not. see below

i just set each = to [math]e^{i\pi}[/math]......i kinda just BSed the answer. i'm only in AP Physics B. [math]{\Delta}kx-{\Delta}wt=\pi[/math] looks like a good answer to me, except it is missing the "time-dependant modulating factor." if that is A, then it might be [math]A({\Delta}kx-{\Delta}wt)=\pi[/math]. keep in mind i have no idea what i'm doing.

use the euler relation i'm completely guessing, but [math]e^{i\pi}=-1[/math], and it said to use that, so maybe [math]k_1{x}-w_1{t}=\pi=k_2{x}-w_2{t}[/math]

if you don't care about faith, then why argue for ID? all it is is faith.

i'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that

only the AB. my school doesn't offer the BC.....yet another reason to hate them...

i've always been told log without a specified base is base 10....and my calculator seems to agree.