ydoaPs

that should do nicely.

stu, evolution does both.

how many threads do we have about this?

what the bleep do we know?

words cannot describe the torture this man should endure, but i'm sure AP will give it a good effort.

why can't we see light that is travelling away from us? simple: it is travelling away from us. you could use a mirror.

herme3, there is more than one solar system

"how can we observe anthing that happened such a long time ago?" a telescope

no, but you do integrate to get the function.

that's one way to look at it. each are a mess on their own evidence? i've yet to see any valid evidence from either site try looking at reputable sites. geocities itsn't a good example. didn't you even look at that cool chart i gave a link to? genesis directly goes against OBSERVABLE phenomina

solving what differential equation?

did you really expect an answer in 7 minutes?

try this article from AiG. skip all the fallacy and go to the chart. also, there are several places that suggest the sun revolves around the earth..... like when the sun stood still....do you understand how much damage would ensue if the earth suddenly stopped? it would be the worst natural disaster ever....and there is NO evidence that it happened.....not even in the story.... let's ignore the part where it says the sun goes around the earth.big problems: conservation of momentum moon crashing into earth edit: i could have sworn the chart had shown how the evil evolutionists say plants came after the sun.

it's been done and the bible has been shown to say absudly stupid things about the universe. even AiG admitted that.

we have supporters in the scientific community?

btw, evolution is NOT random.

we should start with Dak's link and revise into a letter and make it a bit more respectful.

having a being caused by genes? can we get a context?

judging by the other rubbish on their site, i'd say dak is right.

what use is half a wing? lets ask our good friend Mr. Dawkins

could you point to some specific evidence against evolution that isn't addressed on talkorigins?

i suspect every bit of "evidence" against evolution they provide is covered here

it's from christiananswers.net, so it's very unlikely from what i've seen of their site. unfortunately, i can't watch the video because my sound doesn't work, atm. i suspect that it is describing the creationist strawman of evolution go to talkorigins and check everything they supposedly found wrong. i have a feeling it's all covered there.

i'm not even going to bother with the christian answers link. the last ones you gave from there were pathetic. edit: i lied: i looked at it. how can he have a census before 6 CE if he didn't even come into power until 6 CE?

how so?