ydoaPs

like "my blurry pictures are proof of ghosts"? idk, maybe sciforums

as stated before, you are missing the term with momentum.

now how about it's twin in anatomy? a close or merge or something would be nice.

since matter and energy are different forms of the same thing, if you have infinite mass, you will have infinite energy. he didn't say anything about how much mass there is.

no. why would it?

i don't know if you know this or not, but india does have internet access.

|=!\/3

3 seconds? holy crap! how do you think that is fast?

how so? there is no velocity term in it.

why did you post this crap again?

the equation is [imath]E^2=(mc^2)^2+({\rho}c)^2[/imath]. you may say "wait, [imath]\rho=mv[/imath], so if m is 0, then energy is still zero." that is not the case. p=mv is the classical definition of momentum. [math]\rho=\frac{h}{\lambda}[/math]. also, you can use the equation E=hf.

i hate that damn paperclip. i wish there was a program that would let me torture it until it gives me useful information(which it doesn't have) and stops being an annoying pest. i don't like word. i think it may be very poorly written or has problems with xp. every xp computer that i have used word on runs word incredibly slow and word crashes a lot. i have yet to have any problems with openoffice and it is much much faster.

how is that clear? can i have some of what you are smoking?

that is one of their very few arguments. none of which are valid. you have been shown that this claim is wrong. if you can't see it, go back to kindergarden and learn to read.

did you not see my post where i said that i derived it? it isn't that hard. it doesn't even take a knowlege of calculus.

we did it in my high school physics class last year

no. m is still zero in that equation(which you only posted part of).

have you tried looking at bookstores online?

you can't be serious

you would see yourself as being at rest and the stars as moving .999c. you would see their time slowing down.