ydoaPs

i didn't take issue with it because he said although i don't see how he distinguishes a gamma particle from a photon.

he ate his vegetables

could you give the post that prompted the one you quoted? he is pretty much right, though

now drop it.

1)i'm not a biologist, so i haven't had any contact with biology in years. i do, however, know enough to know that creationism is pure crap. 2)the spaghetti monster has more evidence than creationism: 3)creationism cannot be proved or disproved because it is not science. 4)yes there is evidence...fossil...DNA...diversity...adaptation...mutation... 5)this isn't what this thread is about,s o it is going back on topic now 6)creationists are morons

no, only creationists. pick up a text book once and a while. more proof? how about breeding? it is just forced evolution. or our eyes...we can literally see species change over time. i will refuse to give creationism any thought until i am presented with any proof at all.

that's cuz i b >, yo. the proof of evolution is every lifeform, past and present.

yes, look around you...life is change.

evidence for evolution: way more than evough evidence for creationism: 0

might wanna think about that one again. your last few posts were almost strawmans. you might wanna watch that.

i said nothing about people that believe in god. before this thread, i thought you were one of the few sane ones, but as this thread progresses you seem to be moving toward the dark side.

it's not a POV. it is fact. it isn't only this site....it is tha majority.

well, your version doesn't apply to the majority, now does it?

i didn't change anything but your misunderstanding of it. i guess you missed the first part of the thread.

you seem to not understand. this thread if for distinguishing the people that believe in intelligent design from the mouth foaming crazys.

not only are they insane, there are evil as well.

five syllables here; seven syllables here, and five syllables here.

well, the truth hurts.

you are either really good or really bad at taking pictures

it isn't prejudice. it is factual.

we are getting some good quotes regarding creationists lately.

that's going in a quote thread!

i appologize to the few sane creationists. from here on, the term "creationist" refers to the vast majority of creationists. they tend to exhibit said qualities and probably ones that i haven't listed. i know it is accurate, because i have identified several creationists using said properties.

thank you for the example. you are a prime example