ydoaPs

uhhhhhh, i thought you were supposed to use BOTH hands when typing.

go ahead, i have an attack chihuahua.

they don't "teleport" things in star trek. they "transport" things

if you want to argue about time, there are several threads for that. i also said "NO TANGENTS" that means NO BLOODY TANGENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! any further progress on this tangent will result in you being beaten to death with a bucket full of japanese spanners.

time is one of the extended 4 dimensions. therefore it is part of the universe. If you want to continue to debate about whether or not other universes exist, go to the multiverse thread.

there was no before. time is part of the universe.

we play in the winter with pre-frozen paintballs. we have out guns on full velocity. fun fun

there is no outside. the universe is everything. unless you have another definition, THIS IS THE END OF THIS TANGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

forget everclear. I live in Indiana.

that's it. IN the NOTHINGNESS. how can something be in nothing? now, NO TANGENTS, PLEASE

can you give me a definition of a universe where there can be more than one? please don't go into a tangent. it has happened too many times. oh, the memories, bad memories.

Power did go out. squirrel is fried and lights out transformer involved

could you ghetto rig something like an egg timer to it to move the magnet?

but wat?

yay. I am the winner! :Þ edit: sayo's way of saying i win. he doesn't like to admit it when i do

but if the circumference shrinks and radius stays the same, pi no longer equals 3.14......

so pi is NOT a constant?

ok, so it means what? it means that space isn't euclidean?

i haven't read that yet, but i am sorry for overlooking it

again, that is euclidean geometry, which we have already said doesn't apply in this case. edit: the radius is more of an object than the circumference, for it is in the equation.

i thought we have already determined a rotating circle is not bound by euclidean geometry. what do you want a reason for?

they are planning to take over the world, one school at a time. we must destroy every tree, so they have no homes. *insert evil laugh*

i still don't see why everyone is assuming the radius would shrink

quarks have been detected in particle accelerators, so i would say they are NOT theoretical.