ydoaPs

is that enough?

http://www.trancenet.org/groups/news/9808.shtml http://www.factnet.org/cult_danger_growing.html?FACTNet if you want any more, google it yourself.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9802/27/vampire.slayings/ http://www.vampyres.com/portal/modules/wffaq/index.php?op=view&t=70

¤where did this code come from¿¤

yes. look at your computer. you just saw a use of matter.

usually, i **** around on psuedoscience, but i am telling the truth on this. there are several vampire cults.

how do i have strange opinions on everything? you don't even know me. if you don't like enterprise, then don't tell people not to watch it. maybe they would like it. i don't like DS9, but you don't see me saying "deep space nine sux ass."

hey, most of that was based on watching BBC.

that is exactly what i am saying

what is wrong with enterprise?

o. they are real vampires. they even get pointed teeth.

as i can tell from tv/movies, 99.99999999% of british women are rally ugly.

voyager is good. most newbies would like enterprise. it is good for dipping into the startrek universe for the first time.

today, vampirism is a cult. it is like on blade, they have clubs and they drink blood

it's alicia silverstone

a piece of RNA in a lipid bubble cannot reproduce. it would need other chemicals to replicate the RNA. how would it devide.

the planet was destroyed by the ancient egyptian's death ray. then they sucked away most of mars's gravity to power their transdimensional ships.

early mammal ancestors weren't mammals they were early mammal ancestors. photosynthetic protists were the ancestors of plants, but they aren't plants.

i'll change it if u ask nicely

my point is "a piece of DNA in a lipid bubble" is not produced by cells, so it shouldn't be considered a cell.

"a piece of RNA in a lipid bubble" is not produced by a cell; red blood cells are. I should have phrased post #10 better. when i said it wasn't a cell, i meant it wasn't life.

you're the one that said that was the problem with it. I never said I was talking about Jakiri. basically you are saying "don't answer questions with string theory if you can do it with the standard model"? what about questions like "why does a particle have the charge or spin that it does?" you would say "it just does" when it is explained by string theory.

what is wrong with calling red blood cells cells?