ydoaPs

...

KhanAcademy is a really good resource. It's got several areas covered and it's organized well.

Check the bold caption for the photo.

I decided to use my vacation time to work on the logic tutorial, and I've encountered a problem. I tried to make a table, and it gave me the error My code was: \[\begin{tabular}{|1|c|r|} \hline \alpha&\beta&\{\alpha\supset\beta} \hline T&T&T T&F&F F&T&T F&F&T \hline \end{tabular}\] So, how does one make a table in the blog LaTeX?

When?

It turns out that the weak force is just a residual effect of the strong force.

Actually, in the Dover trial, Behe informed us that Astrology is indeed science.

Here is the link directly to the article on their website. There is absolutely no chance of an error this egregious and obvious being an honest mistake. It's an outright lie.

I don't like the way the text wraps mid-word in the editor.

Yes. It was actually FOX and not the Onion or anything similar. This was an actual claim on the actual FOX website a few days ago. Let that sink in.

When there are oscillations in the hyperfine states of the quantum graviton field, the particle wavefuctions are actually perfect hyper-spheres in the Calabi-Yau manifold of subspace at the order of the Planck Length. When this happens, interdimensional phasing occurs which can adjust the amount the particle field is spread through the many worlds. If the field density shift occurs such that the shift puts more of the field excitement in our world, a particle appears! That's how pair production works! This, of course, is all complete gibberish with sciency words.....just like your posts.

Source: me Sometimes I like to try to start anti-conspiracy theories and see how far they spread online.

I recently learned from FOX "news" that WBC is a liberal cult led by a Democrat.

No, you're not. Which is why I have posts like: and everyone agrees. A negative is a huge deal. "Pushing" vs "pulling" is at minimum a difference in sign. That means the vectors will point in opposite directions and the sum will be different than if they both pulled. Furthermore, there's the question of "how much" does it push? Is there a difference if you take the curl or divergence of the vector field? This would tell us how/if there's any curving in the push and how much pushing vs pulling is going on. Yes, the math is different. It is at minimum a different summation. It is in no way "identical". So, show us the math.

I can't say about omnibenevolence, but by some of the more "sophisticated" (read: ad hoc redefinitions attempting to combat incoherence) definitions of "omnipotent", I am indeed omnipotent.

These people probably don't have a clue what NASA's budget is. And it seems a bit odd that they don't have an issue with the insanely huge amounts of money we spend killing people so we can have cheap oil.

That is unadulterated gibberish. It reminds me of the writing for Eureka.

Absolute velocity? o.O

Ooh, word salad and unrendered html. Nice.

No, it didn't. The Mayans didn't have DST or leap years. It actually reset months ago.

My netbook can run it just fine. Chances are anything (s)he has can run it.

There is no such constant. cx=x2 Divide both sides by x c=x Look at that, your constant is a variable.

Logic, math, and evidence beat "common sense" every time.

It does the same thing the in-browser flash client does. It's just a standalone program.

I'm on a computer that I don't play it on, and it let me download it just now without logging in or anything. To play it, though, you need a login. And the good mods are server side. The only user side mods I know of are just like custom paintings and whatnot that only you can see.