ydoaPs

I'm gonna call BS on that one. Have you never heard of Climate Change Deniers or Young Earth Creationists?

We'll start with an easy one. Try number 16 and think double negation.

How about childish in the sense that it's the thinking of a spoiled two year old? I think that counts as childish. The entire OT's message is "do what I say or I will kill you" which is an extension of the completely childish view of justice based on "you hurt me, so I'm going to hurt you". This is a straight up two year old mentality. People try to justify it by talking about the "love" of the NT, but that just shows they missed the point. The NT just takes the OT's "do what I say or I will kill you" and turns the "kill you" into "torture you forever". There is nothing constructive about Hell. You do not come out of it a better person, or at all for that matter. Hell is the ultimate "you hurt me, so I'm going to hurt you"; there is no justice there. The entire anthology is of a two year old mentality. It's just that the NT turns the two year old into a psychotic stalker as well. There is NOTHING backing up Immortal's claim I quoted earlier. It's historically incorrect. It's scientifically incorrect. The morality is such that slavery is moral and consentual love between two adults is worthy of death. There is nothing there that could not have been dreamt up by goat herders, and as I discussed above, it is incredibly childish.

Two things: 1) Are you allowed to use Condition Proof and Indirect Proof methods? 2) What have you tried so far? (we're not in the business of doing homework, but we'll help you get the answer yourself)

Do you have a specific question?

Two 5 sigma results confirming the 3 sigma results from last year is a FAR cry from inconclusive.

Protons are positively charged and the nuclear force is limited in range. This means that the closer protons get, the harder they repel, until they reach the point where the nuclear force kicks in and become bound. The potential right before the barrier is HUGE. How do you bypass it?

The results from this year are actually just confirmation that they found it last year.

How do you propose bypassing the Coloumb Barrier at low temperatures?

Yes, yes they are.

Ah, yes, energy is not conserved. How could we not see this before?

It's not a technological problem; it's physically impossible.

My extension cord long enough to reach the neighbor's flat is a free energy machine now?

Yes, there will always be losses. There are losses from electrical resistance, there are losses due to friction, and there is wear and tear. The very act of pulling energy out of a system means that the system has less energy. Conservation of energy says that free energy is a no-no.

It doesn't.

viXra should be a heads up that it's probably garbage.

That's one of the better Nova episode. There's a really good National Geographic documentary called Ape Human which details the similarities and differences between humans and chimps. It also shows complex tool using in chimps (they use two different types of worked sticks to gather termites more efficiently).

So you missed the part where they said science can't explain EM breaking the bonds between the hydrogen and oxygen. And that it can't explain the burning of hydrogen if you light the hydrogen? Seems legit.

In DC, there's a church called "Jesus Christ, Scientist".

Good thing we're not talking about fruit. Electric fields and magnetic fields are relativistic transforms of each other. They literally are the same thing.

Indeed, Unicorn, that's right. Marriage was a trade agreement long before it was a religious thing and WAY before it had anything to do with love.

How can we tell the difference?

Calm down, Unicorn. I'm pretty sure he went down without a headshot.

Your definition of "distance" was essentially "length is how long something is". Rather than being useful, it was entirely circular.

You spelled "circular" wrong. There's no "s", "f", or "e" in it, and there's only one "u".