Roberts ratios

I wish I could give you a theory neatly tied up in a bow,but, I can not. Because I was able to determine A.U. as a function of Planck's constant it made me persue other celectial magnitudes from constants. Through patient trial and error and a great deal of sequential thinking the relationships developed. I can not tell you how or why, only that if these constants were not at some basic level related to reality accurate predictions would be impossible. Try a little math problem. THE RATIO OF, the amount of the mass of the sun PER each cubic centimeter of the volume of the orbit of the earth TO the amount of the mass of the earth PER each square centimeter of the spherical surface area of the orbit of the earth. I found the result to be an unwanted suprise. Robert

Planck's constant is measured with the second, the 2.9773568 X 106 centimeters is also measured with the second. I believe that this distance, because of the common second, bares a relationship to the gram centimeter2 represented in Planck's constant. Robert

The distance the earth is away fron the sun varies from microsecond to microsecond. The orbit is slightly elipitcal. At APHELION it is 1.5206 X 1013 centimeters away. At PERIHELION it is 1.4708 X 1013 centimeters away. So twice a year I am right--- WHY?? As I have said, I have no theory, wish I did. All I have is some very curious unexplainable mathematical relationships which could not possibly predict the magnitudes which they do unless there is some underlying reason. Come on... with a few physical constants and some very simple math, all of which is exact, magnitudes of the solar systems dynamics are predicted. I don't believe this is numerology. Loosen up a bit and explore ideas which might lead to some NEW scientific information. I have no idea as to why the constants are related to cosmological magnitudes, but, I will keep exploring because it is an exciting adventure.

There can not be any action in the operating dynamics of the solar system which is not an exact multiple of Planck's constant. The distance the earth travels in one second is an underlying clue to the relationship between the gram cm2 and this time. I can not answer how, but this leads to the calculation of the mass of the sun from several additional constants, G, c, and me. More underlying clues. If dimensional analysis is forgotten for a moment, and we ask......if these constants (most likely some exact multiple of each of them) were not part of this dynamic, could the mass of the sun be so accurately predicted from them.

The second does represent a distance, in this case it is the distance the Earth travels in that time. I believe this distance justifies using the unit of action in these calculations.

file:///Users/robertpropoggio/Downloads/Physical%20Constants%20&%20the%20Solar%20System%20%232%20%20PDF.pdf.download/

file:///Users/robertpropoggio/Desktop/THEORY%20/COSMOLOGICAL/Physical%20Constants%20&%20the%20Solar%20System.cwk Chris, Thank you for patient advice, it is appreciated. I'm just an old man who uses an Apple computer, albeit badly, who wants to share some of the results of over 35 years of study and contemplation. I have tried for several hours to put this simple paper into some form for transmission. I am frustrated and have so far failed. All of you interested in this sort of thing will enjoy the simple accuracy of the results of this paper. It will leave you thinking that there are, perhaps, some other ways to view cosmological magnitudes with respect to magnitude and characteristics of the electron. Won't somebody be brave enough to send me an e-mail address so I can send the pdf paper. Once you read it you will see the necessity of sharing it. Please someone send an e-mail address, I am harmless and will not abuse it. Thanking you for your patience Robert

file:///Users/robertpropoggio/Downloads/Physical%20Constants%20&%20the%20Solar%20System%20%232%20%20PDF.pdf

I would appreciate it if you would tell me how to do this. My paper is in pdf form, would that suffice? Some forms delete the equations which were done on Equation Editor. This is a very sound paper, no "numerology" as suggested. By combining several constants in simple ratios relationships are established which predict celestial magnitudes exactly. Thanking you Robert

file:///Users/robertpropoggio/Desktop/THEORY%20/COSMOLOGICAL/Physical%20Constants%20&%20the%20Solar%20System%20%232%20%20PDF.pdf

Here is the conclusion to my paper, if you give me your e-mail address I will send you a copy. If you study the simple equations perhaps you can detect flaws which may have escaped me. Thanks for you comments. CONCLUSION Using several physical constants and the rest mass of the electron it has been shown that it is possible to predict magnitudes specific to the Solar System. A reasonably accurate magnitude for the Astronomical Unit was determined using Planckʼs constant and some simple geometry. A relationship between the Astronomical Unit calculated using Planckʼs constant and an Astronomical Unit, close to the accepted value, was shown to be a function of 1/4 the distance light travels in one second. The exact mass of the Sun was determined using several physical constants and the Astronomical Unit, and from this relationship it was possible to predict the gravitational force of attraction of the Sun for one gram at a distance equal to the average A.U. using only three physical constants and the rest mass of the electron. The velocity of any object orbiting the Sun at A.U. distance was derived from the previously determined force of attraction for one gram. It was demonstrated that with several physical constants, A.U. and the rest mass of the electron, a magnitude equal to the product of the mass of the Sun and G was obtained. A novel equation was produced using characteristics and magnitudes of the electron which will predict the gravitational force of attraction of any object in orbit about the Sun. The specificity of this equation for the Solar System begs for further study in order to generalize it. A concept of the number of electron masses equivalent to an orbiting mass and the total amount of time which they would correspondingly represent , at the time one one electron wave for each electron mass equivalent, suggested that when a force equal to G acted for this length of time, the impulse produced has a relationship to the gravitational force of attraction. The period of any object in orbit about the Sun was shown to be a function of, its distance from the Sun, the mass of the Sun, the rest mass of the electron and the frequency of a electron. The fact that accurate predictions of magnitudes of the solar system were obtained using simple ratios of several physical constants suggests, that these constants, and magnitudes and characteristics of the electron may allow for new interpretations of the dynamics of celestial mechanics. The specificity of these equations for the solar system is perplexing, but, perhaps with thorough study some fundamental generalizations can be conceptualized. 8 Robert Propoggio permls@fastermac.net 618-996-2243

Using just the physical constants; c, h, G and the rest mass of the electron, with simple ratios it is possible to predict, the average Astronomical Unit, the mass of the Sun, and the average velocity of any object orbiting the Sun at A.U. distance. These ratios allow for the formulation of a different type of gravitational equation which is specific for the solar system. There is nothing unique about the solar system, but, these ratios do predict exact values. Perhaps with in these calculations there will appear concepts which will allow for generalizations which would apply universally.