jorden

My questions were about the big bang theory and primordial soup, which apparently is inorganic matters turning into organic matter and building themselves up to becoming walking humans. Now that makes no sense since the organisms they talk about have no nuclei controlling them, then the only thing they were capable of was living.

Step 1. Get dictionary Step 2. Look up hypothesis, theory Step 3. Get educated By definition, hypothesis is an idea in attempting to explain a phenomena. By definition, theory is a COLLECTION of ideas in attempt to explain a phenomena. So, at most the theories were taught to me wrong. Not the definitions.

Well moontanman, you just supported my original post. They're possible but no actual proof, nor anything stating they're not wrong. Hypothosis = educated guess. Theory = educated guess with minimal facts and proof supporting it and nothing saying otherwise. So now there's a conflict for the everyone to figure out.

There not my ideas of what they mean, those were the definitions i was taught 4 years ago. So unless the definition changed or they taught the wrong definition. Now I'm just really confused. If it wasn't an explosion, which is what my biology teacher taught, who held a masters degree, which surprisingly I asked him both these questions and he didn't know the answers, the why call it a big bang? Why not expansion theory? See this is what I mean. Is a masters degree in biology wrong? Or did things change without my knowing?

The embryos could have a modified effect to that of a human with down syndrome. When you think about it its the same thing. The mother has less then the father the father adds the extra and thus down syndrome. Same effects the other way around. Now since this is cats and not humans it could be a modified version. Since the offspring tend to typically look like the mother, based on the other test, this mix should do the same. As far as genetic mutations, there shouldn't be a problem. If, however, (big if) the litter is big enough then 1 may come out with a genetic mutation. But you really shouldn't have a problem with it. If you still fear it, then periodical check ups and prenatal care should help ease your mind.

Your right. Your formula.was different. I simplified it using the square. You have 8 total solutions. 6 are Aa and 2 are aa. Make fractions and reduce. 75% Aa and 25% aa. So yes your right. Not really a trick question as it is throwing in another genotype to make you think about it. You can't over think in science or you end up with huge marginal errors.

Ok, first off I'm 22 and I know I'm young, I have no scientific studies degrees or anything even saying I'm an expert in this field. So if you have anything to say to be Dick about it just post your reply and i'll tell you what I think. As far the big bang theory goes it states simply that the universe.was created by a massive explosion. Here's my point its ever so large flaws. If space lacks oxygen or at least enough for human survival, remember an explosion needs fuel, and even though its hydrogen, highly flammable, not so much explosive unless under pressure, which space obviously lacks, then how in the world could it be one mass explosion? Considering the fact that there are also other chemicals mixed in there all with varying combustible temperatures, and space being so cold since there was no sun, how could there have been any explosion in the first place? To me this seems a very flawed theory with so many holes you can poke at, you can close your eyes and poke it with a stick and be guaranteed to hit one. As far as the primordial soup theory, how does a one celled organism fuse with another one celled to create a two celled organism with only one brain or central control point? In theory, I guess it would be possible if the organisms decided to anything besides live or if they multiplied.to the point that they had no space and thus had no choice or decision in the matter, which in itself is completely preposturous. So, as you can see there is no way its possible without some outside force acting upon them. I googled these theories ferociously and couldn't find a single person who had these same thoughts. I searched through the forums and couldn't find anyone who asked these same questions. I understand a theory is just that, a theory. And I know a theory is hypotheses that can be neither proven or disproved, but with holes this big how can anyone agree with thsm? If anyone has an explanation I would be glad to read them. I probably missed something somewhere but I don't think i did. Thanks for taking the time to read this long post. Hopefully someone has something to say about this.

Have you tried Google?

I read that wrong. Redo. There is only ideas of either expanding to max and returning to its original start of a small ball, or super massive black holes devouring everything. But with super massive black holes having feeding times and pauses inbetween it might not happen for millennias to come. I've something about the sun expanding to keep feeding on hydrogen, meaning that it eventually it engulfed everything and then reverses and implodes on itself. At its size I would imagine it create a black hole in its wake.

Hello everybody, names jorden and I have this idea that most scientific theories are flawed beyond human recognition but with simple, and I do mean simple, common sense can be completely denied and PROVEN wrong. Maybe I'm over exaggerating but that's my theory and I'm going to stand by it.