Appolinaria

Psh, like any of these blabbering fools would be so lucky

That's a little harsh.

If no one responds to this in time, I would just search "Arrhenius equation" on youtube, and watch as many videos as you can. Whichever pronunciation is used most, I would also use. It seems like it's commonly pronounced "er-reen-ee-us" and "nay-EL".

I have to say that I respect that a lot, iNow. That's interesting. So if there is a god, why follow rules? Why have logic? Why not just use his all powerful creation magic to get the job done?

I thought he was interesting :<

I do believe a lot of mental disorders don't cause any extreme physical differences from that of someone without. I'm sure that someone who's depressed won't look as healthy, but overall I don't think they are very discernible. If you're talking about something like mental retardation then that's a different story I guess. For physical attractiveness, I've read things on the symmetry of a face and attributes that signify health... like long, healthy hair, unblemished skin, estrogen levels, blah blah blah. The slight changes to the way a face is constructed can also subconsciously make us think a certain way about someone's character. It makes sense that we would be attracted to the healthiest of the bunch. But I do not think "beauty" is the only factor in the driving force of evolution, nature will still kill off the weakest overall according to our environment's fluctuations regardless if we find it attractive or not. That's because I don't think what's attractive to people is only ever what's best for survival, just very likely.

Oh, I'm sure. Could you please explain your reasoning, it would answer a lot of things for me.

Ah, thank you for enlightening me about the ancient times Mr. Swanson.

Really?

The Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago? But I might be misinterpreting that as the beginning of the universe, and it might just be the beginning of the expansion?

What do you mean by that?

It's finite, idfk. Unicorns?

There's no objective evidence of that. But there is objective evidence that our universe exists.

Interesting. I'm thinking over millions of years, even if we can alter our genes to adjust to our environment, Earth will still change, other factors will change... based on how we differ from our ancestors, it's inevitable we will be very different. Natural selection will still have a say even if we can change our genes.

High five!

Magenta has no wavelength, I would like objective scientific evidence that it exists.

Please, no more numerology, I've already used up all my walls to scribble out all of my secret formulas.

I pos repped you feeding a troll feeding a troll..... Well you shouldn't let bad apples ruin anything for you. Your intentions are good in wanting to share something that has given you knowledge. But I think a little explanation should accompany the picture, not everyone may understand it & will resort to ridicule. They will think you're like others who have just wanted to appear grandiose without substantial knowledge of science. I wouldn't want that happening to you if your intentions are valid.

What is so unique about that image? I think you should share your knowledge, or try to educate those who don't understand.

Dang, we were attractive. I wonder if in a couple million years, if we survive until then (probably not), my face will be recreated and displayed with the younger of the species going "ewww!" Is there a way to predict what we'd look like? What route we'll go, how our genes will change to adjust better to our environment? What we might look like in a couple million years? I'm sure it's been done.

You should share the wealth. Haha, you scientists will never get away from us...

Copyright 1998. So crack-pots did exist prior to internet forums being popular? Then what was the glass box used for displaying their crack-pottery?

Is it?