matty

INcurable

I think joining a pre-med forum is much more productive for this sort of thing. http://forums.studentdoctor.net/forumdisplay.php?f=5, just act like you belong there. A lot of MDs frequent these places and help the students.

So you don't wear a mask of some kind?--this isn't like sneaking the saftey glasses off when OSHA walks away, you know, lol. Scary to think of irresponsible bacterial engineers messing around with public health, *ew*.

I dunno, man, pretty sure that's a crawly warbler low center of that second slide, you better follow microdude to the doc... Oops, sorry, micro, meant Scienceshark, I don't wanna go spreading rumors around thIS department. This was first posted a lOng time ago, I do hope you've been to a doctor.

A biopsy is in order, that can't be done via the the best medical forums on the net... http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/skin-biopsy/MY00169 NO, you need an MD, seriously.

Have they actually disclosed what they've set aside for it, any target dates or signs they're looking into location themselves?--eh, still sounds a bit unorthodox, some kinda quirky questionably organized offer to me without already having addressed these issues, eeshk...

Heh, yeah, good point on the first, I'm getting a case of tunnelvision, but no-no on the latter. I did not say correcting AGW causes economic downfall, I said quite specifically that irresponsible, haphazard legislating toward that end, however well meaning is, well, irresponsible, and dangerously haphazard especially at this time. If you legislate away jobs by way of suffocating industry in the event of such correction, however, it certainly does negate some of the job creating you do in the corrective sector, lol...

More to the point I was making, cretin, why do you suppose it wasn't your Lindzen they'd appointed to the helm? Right on, and not just those items you've accounted for, naturally, but the manufacturing processes before them which begat them. Of course, we have a duty to an eye toward the future, goes without saying. But we'd better be awful careful on the picking and choosing what we do to that end. If AGW is irresponsible at a certain mindless level, so, too, is--just as numbly--playing into our own economic eventual downfall in an effort to slow it, the US being an international hub, even still. Kinda relegates the entire agw effort itself, then, somewhere in the realm of an ironic final factor in the grand scheme of our eventual demise, maybe the last thing we'll ever find ourselves having a hand in manufacturing so freely.

haha, funny, cretin, guess I'll eventually have to go back in and look at it myself, been a while but, still you've all but missed my point, probably because I'm getting turned around and had been speaking, I'm sorry, with ***CETI.*** See here I said, "Yes, You," as in CETI, he's the one who used 'canard' on me, not you. I'll have to be more careful .. But the pdf is on my list of to-dos, thanks.

Thanks, I'm very interested in what people are basing stance on these days; someone scoffed at peer-reviewed materials, which have hardly ever been the sole sources at play on either side of the fence, but then so bring something to the discussion of your own, by my thinking. I'm also interested to give a look back again on the detail of these climate model calcs and what goes into them--out of the loop. Do they take into account carbon sinks, irradiance, et al?--Sure they do, but how spurious, anyway, is it all by then?--Figure them for repackaging the Kyoto before too long, under climate change and I hope it's to make it more honest, not more palatable for public consumption as in the past with so many other things that have meant major paradigm shifts to our eventual well-being--or not. In regards to the debate you watched, something no one has ever alluded to as many times as I've shown it around, we were looking to Michael Crichton to head it up, walk us through it--yes?--his creds amounting to having written a fictional work on the subject----in much the same way we were looking to the likes of an Al Gore from the other side of the fence. It should be an entertainment then, the parallel, the climate we're drawn in by today. And at least as frightening as any work of fiction to date... Truth really is stranger than fiction, eh. ~Thanks for sharing your view, I'll catch up with that read over the next day or so.

Oh, duh!lol Really outing myself here.--Yeah, guess even in progressive extrusion stamping dies with hole punching/blanking I've never seen a superthickness of material you'd expect to see in a rocket industry application. Wow, I have a lot of catching up with mainstream to do. Interesting, your number crunching thus far, though, going back to play catch up on that link you'd left earlier, thanks for sharing... Btw, ever seen a roll mill at work? Not appropriate to your application here but with respect to progressively wrapping/forming material (against rolls in this case) in order to eventually, by way of stations--as with progressive dies--meet a sharply concave spec not otherwise in the realm of do-able, as you suggest here, well, it's pretty interesting stuff.

Heh, k, I give up.--What are you?

Sorry, yes, you, on the cooling canard, of course, no, I wasn't suggesting to discount obvious, inescapable warming trend science in light of that, lol. Strange how the moment you have an opinion or suggestive idea folks are so quick to throw any number of leaps in with the mix... Well, aren't you a hoot..

Even a sheet of paper is a 3D object. It has not just a given length and width but depth, thickness, as well in order even to exist.

Glad you returned with that, neato, you must naturally be referring to EDM? EDM can accomodate the size of this stuff today? Trying to wrap my brain around that... I'll have to return later, unfortunately, time's gotten away from me this evening.

*Lol*, does sound rather incredulous, doesn't it?, I did question it myself, why, then, hadn't we seen it not just arrive on scene but blow up?--Shoulda made bigger news beyond just the disgusting, lol.

Be right with you, scuuze me.