0.0001 mass

no worries, im pretty certain you are more clued up with current matters than i am. I guess i found the content sort of romantic to a point if you see where im comming from, the fact that this man is saying he has possebley got proof of the oneness (i dont like this term but it will do) the fact he talks about ocilating particles, "where and who are you when you are not here?" did you watch that part of the vid, Baric? This is the sort of thing that could make some poor souls head implode lol is space more energetic than matter? i would like to know if this is true, the man does ask some good questions though and has a point with the dimensions....did you guys really get taught that in school? im going to have to watch it again this time with a note pad and write down my problems i have with it, once ive done that i will look into them, then i will send his firm an email and im wanting an answer this time lol cheers scott

It is a shame, i was sort of hoping this wasnt the case as i quite like some of the theories, i make no attempt to hide the fact i am someone who likes to read things esoteric, Tao etc and i find that Quantum physics is quite well described in some relations, this is what basically got me interested on this subject if im totally honest, but im not one for believing everything anyone says, which is why i came on here to talk with the likes of you guys who are better clued up with the subjects at hand. I have Emailed his company in the past for more explanations and even offering to volunteer for his non proffit orginisation, at least this way i would know what is going on behind the doors, but no answer. i guess i can only continue to pick away at things at my own pace, and hopefully some of you guys here dont mind taking the time to chat about things i find current science just doesnt hold up to, maybe it does but im just not understanding them. cheers anyhoo guys, i appreciate you taking the time to have a look at it. regards scott

Hi Phi, please accept my appologies, I see where you are comming from, it could appear that i am just spamming the site for some reason but my post is genuine interest on the subject, i just tend to beat about the bush, i cant help it, its just the way i come accross . My reasons for this were that there is alot of information going on with in the video and rather than try to cut it down into sections where i might distort what the content infact is as opposed to what it could turn out like if i explained it in my own way, i thought that if people watched it they would percieve their own views on the matter without my hand influencing their oppinion in any way regarding the content of the vid. There are a few bits in perticular i would like to discuss with people and im sort of testing the water to see if i am in amongst the right type of poeple. The part where Nassim says he is proving that Finite and infinate can both be as one as opposed to seperate as is generally regarded, so he says. he draws a circle which in it has a finite amount of space due to its boundary, but he further states that this fininte space has the propperties of infinity. He goes on to demonstrate how and why. (unrelated,I would like to know why he uses a triangle then another as its opposite pole, does he do this just for the convienence of/for his illistration?) Do you think this is important and accurate in that it will bind the Two opposing views on science toghether? Another bit that interests is whan he starts to scale everything on the Plank scale, now i am certainly not mathimatically minded and thus rely on information given, he states that Space has more energy than matter, by some 10-39 cm3. I would like to know what the people on here who are gifted with this type of understanding have to say on the matter? (no pun) He goes on to say that everything is a black hole and creates matter, im not the best person to explain it, i would have to watch it again, but i do want to know what your view on this statement is, but i imagine you would need to watch the vid to see where i am comming from. This is why i asked people to watch it, its not easy for me to describe, but i would like a better understanding on it from more people so its unbias. Thankyou for letting me keep the post and the link, im sure the more this topic unfolds the more the science will be produced. Another thing that gets my brain ticking is why Nassim heralds the 64 star tetrahedron metric in such high reggard, i see other more left wing theorists doing the same with the Dodecahedron. I am simply just trying to see what truth is in what they say, regardless of how the messenger appears. regards scott Ps I just tried to edit the first post to add in information, it appears i can only edit my last recent post.

well that would depend on the types of flowers <iframe src="http://player.vimeo....&portrait=0" width="400" height="265" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen> this vid should be the whole version. *edit* i could not get the code to work, im not that familure with this forum, so ive just posted it. Its just there are so many things which the man is saying in this vid, something i feel everyone should have a look at to determin validity of his theories and equations, i have my reservations on certain matters, just little things i pick up that make me feel as if theres something amiss, but theres also some very thought provoking material which, if you have an interest in the science you cant help but like to explore, this is why im asking you guys and trying to encourage you to take a look if you have the time to spare im sure you can get some enjoyment out of thie vid regardless of the reason, good or bad. regards scott

ahh well, i would of hoped intellegent people would like tolook at the actual content held with in the vid and debate it but looks like general ignorance and snobery is going to be the case (not intending to offend you here Timo), i was hoping this wasnt so, if are to learn in life we need to look at all angles. There is always something to learn, every day. I was hoping that maybe on here people would have the scope to actually discuss these matters and their actual content to see if any truth holds up to them, who knows, maybe there is....maybe there isnt, but there could well be a half truth and that could inspire poeple on to the right path. Lets face it, all we are assuming is probabilities, i mean look at in Bhor's day, the neuclues of an atom was said to be pear shaped with springs comong off it, that of which electrodes were attached and emmitted light when excited, this is what they thought when they were studdying the production of light. Laughble today, but again all we can do with quantumn mechanics/ physics is guess the probabilities and even those are statistical and do not apply to every eventuality. It would be nice for more people to discuss. regards scott

Hi Timo, Excellent, you see this is why i need to chat with the likes of your self, what would be far better is rather than you disgarding the content of the vid on this discrepansy that you have with out a doubt cleverly looked looked into and assessed, but also check the content of the vid, as you have proved your worth finding this information out about the award you are without a doubt the type of brain that should be looking at the information in the videos....and who knows, you might even enjoy it I really am wanting to pick away at the vids content to see if his theories add up or whether they are just some cleverly put together pieces of disinformation for the unsuspecting public. Kind regards scott

Hi Timo, on one of his live lectures he talks about recieving an award, he was going to be leaving early from the country in which it was hosted, thinking that with his view on matters he would not be up for an award. They had to explain to him that he was in the running so he would stay for the award, of which to the best of my knowledge he recieved one. I could try to find the live lecture if you wish a look at it. The live one is basically the same as the vid i have posted in the link. Have you seen the Black Whole presentation before?

Hi guys, I wondered if anyone on here has watched nassim Haramein's latest vid on his award winning paper regarding his theories on physics. I am keen in talking about all aspects of life, philosophy and new up and comming theories. I have been reading alot of Tao the last couple of years amongst other ancient scrips regarding knowledge, i find it amazing the our ancestors talk about physics in their own way. Nassim is more than aware of this and it shows in his work, he is a person that likes to think outside of the box as do i, i understand its not eveyones view but i will glad to hear what you have to say on Black Whole as i value your oppinion and will take on board what is said in discussion to hopefully further my understanding. I have joined this forum as i find that there are not many people around me to talk about the things i wish to discuss, most people around preffer to gossip about the nieghbours, TV and other things i feel to me are not as important, so i hope to find some like minded people on here I will post a link to the vid, its about 1hr 30 mins, i hope you enjoy it and that at least there is something you feel you wish to discuss whether you agree with it or not. LINK- http://www.veoh.com/watch/v211655826NC94xJz You can download it if you wish. I look forward to hearing your views. regards scott

HI guys, im new here (obviously), i have a wide interest in many subjects, ancient cultures esoteric teachings, religion(s) and God(s), quantum physics (Wu Li), an appreciation for the world we live in and its people and conciousness, geometry......well pretty much everything if im honest. Ive never joined a forum such as this, it has been more Sea fishing forum and extreme MTB forums, but the more ive settled down the more i find my self reading and studying. At the moment I like to read Tao and slightly different i am reading a book called the Dancing Wu Li Masters which so far has been a great read as it covers quantumn physics without the math which i would struggle with, something i will work on when i have more time. I am very open and think outside the box and try not to ground my self in what has been taught in the past is certain truth as techings and new ideas are always evolving and i would rather be a part of this than repeating old news again and agian. I look forward to chatting to hopefully like minded individuals and hope i can learn from you. Kind regards Scott