dimreepr
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by dimreepr
-
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, altaylar2000 said:
This is not an excuse, you can die from the cold, and there is no need to seek out extremes. Most people eat meat not even out of hunger, but for pleasure.
I didn't say it was and from your answer I'm sure you haven't; but it is an excuse to eat from a bin; and there's no greater pleasure, even if that bin might contain your granny.
If you want the moral high ground, you have to go full-on Buddhist and never knowingly kill anything, even bacteria; extreme enough for you?
-
-
Just now, altaylar2000 said:
There is no difficulty for me. Predators and parasites(in animal world) are not conscious villains, but this is not a reason to equate them with the innocent. There is no such possibility to differentiate precisely conscious villainy, because anyone can be justified in this way, say the rapist is innocent, because nature created him that way. This is idle chatter
Have you ever been hungry enough to eat from a bin?
-
-
-
-
-
Edited by dimreepr
3 hours ago, altaylar2000 said:Moreover, a human consumes meat not even out of necessity, but only for pleasure, since it is possible to provide complete protein nutrition on the basis of dairy products and eggs.
You mean our animal slaves?
7 minutes ago, altaylar2000 said:Not in my ethics. I'll trade billions of villains' lives for one chicken
Define "villains'"...
Do you mean your chicken slaves?
Ethic's mean's different thing's, depending on which side of the cutlery one's viewing.
3 hours ago, altaylar2000 said:But here, in modern ethics, everything is based on the ephemeral assumption that human life is more valuable than the life of an animal. It is a stone's throw from such a postulate to cannibalism, if it is recognized that the lives of some people are more valuable than the lives of others.
Isn't your life more valuable than a stranger?
-
-
2 minutes ago, Prof Reza Sanaye said:
Being (Existence) is the property that we , human beings , derive from "beings" (=Extants).
There are only becoming Haecceities. In other words , Existence is merely one of our own categories of cogitating. Versus , for example , Non-being. Non-being is also another category of human thinking more akin to metaphor.
That's like suggesting a bridge doesn't cross the same river twice...
-
On 3/29/2021 at 3:59 PM, Prof Reza Sanaye said:
This facilitates contact, which is described as a reliable exchange of contents transmitted at a reasonable distance from their intended destination (brought over into the realm of Actuality). As a result, content is both the cause and the effect of communicative expression: it is both the external cause and the pledge of authenticity.
Yet this moment keeps slipping away...
9 minutes ago, Alex Mercer said:I don't really mean contemplating whether a hole or space exists. I am asking more like WHAT IS existence. Does that still need context because I am talking about the word pretty much and how humans define 'existence'. So that is why I say existence is what we can observe and say that is 'it' existing.
Sorry, I meant to include this post...
-
-
-
-
-
4 hours ago, george909 said:
The roots of a racist philosophy begin when a specified race is demeaned and depicted as inferior to one's own race. Apparently "thetruth910000" has all the makings of a racist ideolog worthy of the KU Klux Klan.
Not so much a philosophy, as a political ideology.
On 3/31/2021 at 12:43 PM, altaylar2000 said:Modern Germany is a multi-ethnic country, very different peoples live there, at least one can distinguish the historical Germans of the northwest, who descended from the Paleo-Europeans, Celts, and the descendants of the Huns who occupied lands in the region of Austria Hungary and Bavaria, in addition, probably in the northeast there are also Balts, descendants Prussians. All these peoples are not close to each other, therefore the concept of "Germanic by origin" hardly has any meaning, only in language
Not that "descended from" is any more meaningful, what's your point?
-
-
Edited by dimreepr
12 hours ago, Olorin said:THE LAST WORD
The problem with "the last word" is, it's either misunderstood or replaced...
12 hours ago, Olorin said:I have offered supporting evidence on many counts more solid than the evidence for "Science falsely so called" 1 Timothy 6:16-20 (note here Einstein's postulate already recognised and equated with consciousness itself 0 CE). The Bible is discounted in the same way, yet your coin, and all who "buy and sell globally " do so by commission of the IMF, as prophesied to Abraham Genesis 22:15-18. Your counter evidence – an alternate history of the Jews and explanation for almost impossible prophecies, is simply SILENCE & RIDICULE without KNOWLEDGE.
You have misunderstood:
QuoteThe angel of the Lord called to Abraham from heaven a second time 16 and said, “I swear by myself, declares the Lord, that because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son, 17 I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, 18 and through your offspring[a] all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me.”
As did Abrahams biographer's; "because you have obeyed me.” should read "because you have understood me.”
Such a small change, that changes everything... 😉
-
-
-
-
Will humanity come back to cannibalism?
in Ethics
Have you even read your own thread?