amol12882

Aeschylus Is right. Today QM can also applicable to Macroscopic Word. Hence I think we can prove Newton's Laws of Motion using Shrodinger's Equation.

Fuhrerkeebs, You are right that normalization constant can not be imaginary. What I have done is while normalization I took limit as y to 0 therefore I got imaginary Constant but It can be corrected if I take limit as 0 to y. I got Psi(y,t) = A*Sin(ky)+B*Cos(ky) ; k is constant Using Boundry condition as Psi = 1 at y=0; because Stone should be at ground and dPsi/dt = 0 at y=0; I got B=1 and A=0; After Solving I got Normalization constant as "2/y" Is it right?

It's My mistake, Normalization constant is "-i*hbar/y", after we do Psi(y,t)xPsi*(y,t) then that comes out be hbar^2/y^2. Why Stone can not be treat as electron in a potential mgy?

I have tried to solve the problem of "Stone fall under gravity", I took V = mgy in Time dependent Shrodinger's Equation and try to find, Psi(y,t), in this problem I have neglected the wave travelling in +ve 'Y' Direction because stone will fall downwards. I got a normalization constant as "i*hbar/y" then |Psi(y,t)|^2 is infinite at y=0, which says that stone will be at ground and it is quite obvious isn't it?

How can I prove Newtons Laws of Motion using Shrodinger's Equation ?

Hi budullewraagh, How can I solve Newton's laws of motion using laws of QM? I have to solve TDSE ( Time dependent Shrodinger's Eq) right. Let us a problem of stone fall under gravity. Then V = mgh how to find Psi(h,t) ?

I got the answer to that question, The frame of refrence of that electron is as uncertain as that electron.

Dear Friends, HUP says that dx*dp>=h.Is it also true from frame of refrence of electron, at that time I know position and Momemtum of electron ?