Seems to me that Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory has no (scientific) theoretical opponents. None. Never has had.
That makes it pretty unusual, if not unique.
(I can only think of our concept of ‘time’ as an equally large and mostly unchallenged set of ideas - though, I have read ‘the End of Time’ (Balfour). (And one day, I’ll understand it)).
Which makes me suspicious.
It seems to me that the most scientifically interesting thing that could happen, would be if ‘Evolution’ was challenged.
Be brave: where would I start looking, if I were interested in challenging Evolution? Where are the anomalies? What doesn’t quite make sense about the theory(s)? Where are the chinks?
It’d really be something, if there aren’t any. Unique, even. Wouldn’t that be… odd?
(I only wish I didn’t feel I have to say this, but: I’m not a crypto-Creationist looking for ammo. I’m an atheist who thinks that Evolution is the single Biggest idea, ever. I’m not interested in creationist replies of any kind. Especially those dressed up as Science. I would like people who know what they’re talking about to tell me things I haven’t heard before).
(I can only hope for the best, even though I suspect the politics of this are impossible).
I’m a big-picture guy, and Evolution is the biggest (human) picture there is. Let’s challenge it. Be brave.