-
Posts
72 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by I think out of the box
-
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
THIS IS WHY THIS THREAD ENDS IN: I Need some help here from astronomers whom know about the planet Uranus and its precession cycle. Thanks! BINGO! THIS IS THE BEST ANSWER I HAVE EVER HEARD HERE! CONGRATULATIONS! Yes this does not make me also correct...which is why I am here asking for help..... BUT! I never said I was correct, you just said I was correct... Please do not put words in my mouth...- 49 replies
-
-2
-
What links????? The ones they closed down????? LETS SEE YOU, DO THIS: ANOTHER METHOD OF MINE.... 1 / 0.3178571072492 = 3.14606776816854 = PI RATIO! m /s Now this is division... Go ahead, closed this thread,, i know you will, every time "we" meaning you, can't prove their math such as I, they shut me off.. I ASKED YOU TO CLOSE MY ACCOUNT AND YOU DID NOT. I ALSO COMPLAINED ABOUT OTHERS HERE WHOM HAVE "SWEARED AT ME" AND STATED THAT MY FINDS WERE "DUMB." THEY SOUND LIKE CHILDREN NOT FULL GROWN ADULTS..... YOU EMBARRASS YOURSELVES, MANY PEOPLE ARE SEEING THIS AND NOTICE. HE GETS THE CREDIT FOR "k" also???? Does he also get the credit for the invention of sqauring a number?? How about the summation sign? The Division??? Hymm, seems like Sir Newton gets pamperd much! Dimensional Analysis has no such thing as abuse, because it is dimensionless, it has not form nor existence....Lame attempt to make yourself look good..NOT! .
-
You obviously do not read, i have placed a complaint about your stalking me and derailing my post as an instigator.... THIS TOPIC RELATES TO HAHA! you are so funny, put this in type such as I have! 1/0.3178571072492 = 3.14606776816854 = PI RATIO! m /s what does me mentioning copy right have to do with the title of this thread????
-
These are the famous people from past century sciences that have used numerology to dispher pi ratio. If this is so, then can numerology also be applied to facts in the science world???? Diophantus of Alexandria, 22/7 = 3.14285714285714 http://en.wikipedia...._exceeds_%CF%80 Isaac Newton 223/71 = 3.14084507042254 http://www.ms.uky.ed...h330/Newton.pdf MY PERSONAL FIND: This is my finding not using numerology of which HAS BEEN copyrighted and been validated. -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... I would like to know other's inputs on Issac Newton, and Diophantus of Alexandria in comparing my find to theirs.. Thanks!
- 23 replies
-
-3
-
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Ok, here is some evidence: These are the famouse people from past century sciences that have used numerology to dispher pi ratio! Unlike them, I found pi ratio to its infinitve value, I should be rewarded and respected here not ridiculed. Diophantus of Alexandria, 22/7 = 3.14285714285714 http://en.wikipedia...._exceeds_%CF%80 Isaac Newton 223/71 = 3.14084507042254 http://www.ms.uky.ed...h330/Newton.pdf Mine: -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... http://www.sciencefo...832#entry651832 I have been told that what I do with math is meaningless, obviously the same applies for Isaac Newton, Diophantus of Alexandria, all of which were skilled numerologist by the way...Oh I do not use division... A discussion requires information? Of coarse this is why, I have typed up more pages here than most, and answered questions. I type what I need to say, not copy it from met lab, or other educated resources... I have given wayyyyyyyyyyy much more information to others simply for the fact they were very nice with me, introduced themselves, and further questioned my findings.. Already my finding for pi ratio to its infinite value is being validated, if so, then I will be the first ever to have calculated it in the such method I have... HA! The people whom were nice to me did not accuse me of numerology, meaningless operations , dumb luck or other speculative behavior... You should look at all my threads and see what type of junk has been told to me and all the accusations... This does not inspire me at all, it is not my fault many still live in the "rules" of the system and never question the meaning or purpose of science. Their relation to their "ego" is what I have been subjected to.... Next time you see someone like me, be nice to them and don't accuse them of things. I am no longer responding to you because you have not read, nor even cared to read my thread, please leave me alone... Question about the Year 2018 please??? you have not even stayed on the Topic...And I have been "again" nice enough to respond. Let them close this thread, like I said I have asked them to close my account....If they did not, logic tells me they want me here HA! -
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Still unsure how any of the rules here http://www.sciencefo...tion=rules&f=29 apply to my questions, hence the name of the thread and its intro. Seen me here before?? Yes I am here now and have been since last year.. Thanks for sharing your concern...- 49 replies
-
-1
-
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Nobody knows what you're trying to acheive in these threads??? Have you any idea how many people have contacted me and said WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Prove?????? these are your words not mine, please do not put words in my mouth, its my mouth and my life not yours... I am simply in a discussion here, I do not owe anything to anyone, my ancestors did that for me a long time ago! If you are aggravated at the fact that you do not understand certain things, then please do so by yourself. I decided long ago to take on "real" challenges that makes me a thinker not a follower. If they close this thread, they close their minds!- 49 replies
-
-1
-
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
that mysterious number of 1000 is unit of mass equal to 1000 grams 1 newton = 1Kgm/s^2 (kilogram meters per second squared) This is dimensional analysis in relation to celestial bodies in precession not math, like i said, please do not ask I assure you would not understand. Why do you follow all my post and accuse me of things????? Since your such a math expert, let the world see you at your best... Create a function that = pi ratio to its infinite value! This is mine below whats yours???? 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... 3.14159265358979 second = 0.000872665 degree wow I love numerology thanks! I used to use numbers as a kid and create patterns with them, never knew they also could be patched with dimensional Analysis... -
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Very true my calculations take me to the exact origin as in this small example: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... Under-copyright finding, I just want to share this with the science world and get more involved with advanced technology to help our world even so more now than ever..But it seems that I have jumped out of known science LOL.... Thanks! Ok thanks! gonna check right now... -
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Tres Juicy, let me ask you an interesting question outside the category of this original posting.... If it is true that the speed of light, gravity and pi ratio represent the forces of nature, then can these "one" day be unusable since the forces of nature change as well???? In other words, can the speed of light, gravity and pi ratio expand such as the universe has been doing for some time now? And if so, can these one day be "un-usable" by the science world... Here is an example using a base ten numeral system and infinity empty space, Oh this is copyrighted by the way, just in case I decide to go public.... 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510... 3.14159265358979 second = 0.000872665 degree Feel free to try it out for yourself and please let me know what you found, because I have never calculated this far with such precession. As you can see if -10.86902388503848 one day feels like changing to -12.86902388503848 It can create big problems, very big problems! Instead of running to the Guinness Book of World Records, ""I"" rather speak more to the science world about this. Either participate or stop speculating me and speaking for others whom are not yet present or have not shared their input, until then it is only you speaking here, so please show some respect to others members whom have not yet shared their input. -
Question about the Year 2018 please???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Thanks! So what you are saying is that I need to turn this in to SI Units: 5865696000000 miles/year / 1477.5924512112354 miles/years = 3969765814.1063724 mile Into this for example in SI Units: "G" = 6.67300 x 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2) Meaning that I need to include this ---> 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2) In my that--->5865696000000 miles/year / 1477.5924512112354 miles/years = 3969765814.1063724 mile Also, if you can provide me a good link as to how to convert this to SI units, I would be very appreciative.. I have some understanding on SI units, but what confuses me is if I need to add this 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2) to the values I personally find... I assume I am finding something that creates constants because of their dimensionless properties, as in the h constant?? 6.62606957(29)×10−34 J·s[1] 4.135667516(91)×10−15 eV·s[1 Well give it a try, that's why I placed it up for the benefit of a doubt.. You are more than welcome to add your "chronological" knowledge.... Do you have any input for me? -
This question is geared for those knowledgeable in esoteric astronomy..and or celestial mechanics. I have been experimenting with a function the predicts feature years in relation to earth and other celestial bodies in this case the planet Uranus and its precession cycles of seasons just like on earth. What it predicts is the Solstice Periods from earth in relation to other celestial body's relative movements in outer space. Yes I know, it uses pure numbers in space as dimensional analysis. I am wondering if anyone here has heard anything of signification to the earth year of 2018.. I have read some articles about metaphorical beliefs but would really like to hear some input from "astronomers" as I think this relates to the precession of the planet Uranus which looks like it may be in phase with earth, in other words, I think when the planet Uranus is in its solstice and equinox periods, it is very much in phase shifts with earth.... The derivatives of the sequence years start from past 1776, future 2029, and present again in relation to earth year 2018, which is very close to our current time of 2012...off by 2012-2018 = 6 years from now. Please do not ask what this small function is or where I got the numbers from, trust me, you would not understand I assure you! Just concentrate on the year reversals and with your knowledge of what you know about cosmology, we all can benefit from something new here. The main focus here is what the year 2018 in our future time represents and if its true that earth has completed a 26,000 year precession cycle in our current time of 2012. Thanks! 2*5.01152761345206-1776/10407058172984609000-2029 = -2018.976944773096 when calculating other areas of this relation of the year 2018, the function states that one of the planets Earth or Uranus has completed a 27,000 year precession, I am not sure which one! Do you know anything about planet Uranus????? 1776 X 5.01152761345206 +2029 Y 2.48891403252446e-8 = 1477.5924512112354 miles/years= 1477.5924512112354 <----- RELATIVE CHANGE???????? Here I am still a little unsure if I have used the correct units, but is seems to be fine.. 5865696000000 miles/year / 1477.5924512112354 miles/years = 3969765814.1063724 mile 3969765814.1063724 mile = 0.000675288 light year 0.000675288 light year *10e3 = 6.75288 light year 6.75288 mile = 1.148717527e-12 light year 186.000 /1.148717527e-12 light year = 161919702301190.7 161919702301190.7 mile = 27.543803529 light year PRECESSION???????????????????????? I Need some help here from astronomers whom know about the planet Uranus and its precession cycle. Thanks!
-
How do you get fractions of light???
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Relativity
Thanks, got the links, I am gonna take some time on these and study... -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Forget about the drama, later you will see what I mean.... I need the derivative of these two values please in relation to time using 1 light second of 186,000 miles. Do it in your expertise I do not care. Then you will be able to understand what I am doing when you see my results compared to yours. If your find and my find are legitimate and we both agree on this, then you may learn something new and thank me later, for making you think out of the box..Let go of the assumptions until their facts remember???? I think it is only fare as there are two pages here I completely worked on with math, that's lots of brain power! These are the values... this is the same as x 1776 y 2029 2029 is the delta change Perhaps we should wait until the "notified individual" replies to the comment "I" sent them. Therefore there wont be any confusion... Forums Rules?????? Is calling someone a ""SMART ASS""" against forums rules?????????????? If so I think you should read this thread more thoroughly...And stop making accusations yourself!!!!!!!!!!!- 43 replies
-
-2
-
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
still waiting for your pi=3 -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
Been on these for quite some time now about four years to be exact and I completely disagree with the above link http://hyperphysics....se/mod6.html#c3 in relating to the functions for black body radiation: here are my reasons: They use these: 8*pi, 4* c^3, Since you all are such experts, then please explain why does most of every constant in known science use the base numeral system of ten as in the following: Values of h 6.62606957(29)×10−34 4.135667516(91)×10−15 6.62606957(29)×10−27 Values of G G of 6.754 × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 (1 Da = 1.660 538 782(83)×10−27 kg) electron mass 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms proton mass 1.67262158 × 10-27 kilograms Here I will give you a hint: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 -10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 3.14159265358979 3.14159265358979 second = 0.000872665 degree +10.86902388503848+14.01061653862827 = 24.87964042366675 24.87964042366675 second = 0.006911011 degree G+14.01061653862827 = 23.81061653862827 23.81061653862827 second = 0.00661406 degree log(0.006911011) = -2.16045841578005 =10*10 = 100% It seems that all known systems of measure are predicated on the denomination of 100! I will wait for your answers and hope you can put your math in your words such as I have, if there is no reply that can prove this wrong using your math skills, then this means I win, and you loose and my creation of math over rules yours! HA! -
Negative energy
I think out of the box replied to morgsboi's topic in Modern and Theoretical Physics
why would you set zero to infinity???? doesn't zero represent an empty space though?? I think that zero empty space could only represent "that" empty space in which it is being evaluated... E= mc squared "must" represent something squared in relation to energy "spaces." If not then the whole universe would have been " demolished" when it was first tested.... Surly this must be a wrong concept in relation to y not x only backwards, as in negative energy that represent the negative of that infinitive space much like standing wave models versus propagation of waves and or Doppler effects. These are all within domains of their calculations, and in no way can represent a whole of infinity.... Also, singularities hold true "only" from the perspective of this "area" of multiple infinities beyond this "limitation." If energy is truly conserved then their must be somewhere that takes place for this transportation to occur or merging to occur. Some would rather refer this to 1, or 0. Some also refer to this as nodes, "areas" even volume, pressure, phase shifts... I think in order to truly understand the "why" of this relation, we must use the same principles of conservation in a mathematical sense. The math evolved will then be synchronized thus will allow calculations for precession to the extreme. Withing this precession cycle I strongly believe that energy and mass are one """"""AGAIN"""""" For the time being for that instant they are not.. Your answer is quite simple...... The person digging this hole works as the medium between the pile and the hole. This person is the node in between the work. For every "shovel" of dirt there is a relative movement that lays in-between the hole and the pile. In this there is a precession going on because the pile gets bigger and the hole gets deeper. Yet our modern ways of understanding precession and the curvature of space time work in a rigid linear method which still connot be understood for what it is, strong nuclear forces is a good example.. The precession cycle no matter how long or how short, is this area in where the conservation of energy transforms through a 3rd position in time and space confused as singularities in the belief that nothing can travel faster then the speed of light...... If this was the case, the entire universe would be encapsulated in a static c x c cube, and we would all be much closer together than we think! Pi ratio for example can be used as the person doing the digging. Surly this "number of pi ratio" must also have an inverse - twin then right???????? How else can that circumference be held then??????In empty space of nothingness???? This is where the Higgs Field Comes In.. But I will save that for later.... However, every circle has a precession, completion, association with time, and etc. Looking deeper at this though, pi "also" represent empty space too. The answer is in precession and being able to detect it with pure "Static" mathematics..- 14 replies
-
-1
-
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
What I did was calculated black body radiation using pure numbers and specialized functions.... What does this prove??? Infinity has an end within every known number squared , singularities exist because people "think" it is related to time when it is not, hence 10^3 kilometers = volume = cuboid. So far, there has been no one that can prove me wrong on this, many have tried to speculate but they neither understand or perhaps really do not want to give this a benefit of a doubt, use the numbers I gave them and compare their own results with their own math knowledge. Why do I care ?? because scientist make big mistakes, then me and others in this world havto to live with it... I am no longer waiting for answers, I am now going to give them... The numbers are there, comapre them to your own functions and or equations (which of coarse are based on mathematical "LAWS") , then get back to me if you may. Thanks... -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
No Your Going In Circles, where have you been??????? LOOK!!! I saw this on Your Chocolate You Tube Video Frequency Example: Here is what I have to say, You Think Too Fast, RELAX! Oh, I did this in a hurry, but the units should be ok. 6.5 cm 6.0025 gh/s 6.5 cm= [x 0.67785464835938 6.0025 gh= [y 0.61659530457031 [x 0.67785464835938 cm *[y 0.61659530457031gh = 0.41796199335955 gh/s 0.41796199335955 centimeter/second = 0.00417962 meter/second 0.00417962 m/s - 299.792458 = -299.78827838 m/s -299.78827838 m/s / 299.792458 m/s = -0.99998605828836 m/s -0.99998605828836*100 = -99.99860582883599 percent error NOW, you remember in your video when you said that 6.5 c needs to be multiplied by 2 to get a completed cycle???? This may not be necessarily true. Here is why and yes this is the pi thing again. 6.5 c *2 = 13 c 13 c *2450.000000 gh = 31,850,000000 gh 31,850,000000 gh centimeter/second = 318.5 meter/second NOW, this is where I come in: 1 / 318.5 = 0.00313971742543 <------------- that right there is pi ratio to 10e-2, just round this off and you get : 3.14* 10e-2 = 3.14*10e-2 = 0.314 Interesting how you round off using only numbers too right.>>>>?? Now, something else, this explains the "why" of: 6.5 c *2 = 13 c = "1" complete cycle when infact you are just squaring this 6.5 c in relation to pi ratio which is c and G, combined... "You said it yourself" "Electro Magnetic Wave Frequencies" with the speed of light, of which are 3 complete separate things, as per the science world. Or better still, 10e---------->3 = 1Newton = K = 1000-----> how about that for methodology.....lol Thanks for the "nice" explanation, and yes I was very confused on this. -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
The numbers you gave me are unicodes 7F 1FFF Unicode x1000–1FFF Graphic characters are characters defined by Unicode to have a particular semantic, and either have a visible glyph shape or represent a visible space. As of Unicode 6.0 there are 109,242 graphic characters.Graphic characters are characters defined by Unicode to have a particular semantic, and either have a visible glyph shape or represent a visible space. As of Unicode 6.0 there are 109,242 graphic characters. -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
sorry I do not deal with unicodes for now, thanks! -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
In a sense, for instance how about you tell me what area you would like to see in relation to a speed unit, a derivative or frequency. Why not show me some some samples and then I can get a "clue" as to how to perform the calculations for you... I think this will be a great idea, because "then" our heads will be on the same track to understand the results together. And like the titles says, COMPARE NOTES//// Thanks! Well, I think the 1 signification digit is in relation to this 10e3 kl as in this here: 3.14/1314454.947355718 = 0.00000238882284 log(0.00000238882284) = -5.62181605722515 1 / 10e-5 = 10000 299.792458 / 10000 = 0.0299792458 0.0299792458 degree = 0.000333103 quadrant log(0.000333103) = -3.47742145593813 3.14 / 10e-3 = 314 1 / 314 = 0.0031847133758 log(0.0031847133758) = -2.49692964807269 1 / 10e-2 = 10 3 / 10 = 0.3 0.3-299.792458 = -299.492458- 299.492458/-299.492458 = 1 1*100 = 100 -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations
These are the most beautiful numbers I work with thanks! I defined them with empty proportionality in space in relation to G. 6.28318531 and 1.61803399 phi [ x 87809.73611468765 2x pi [y 2142470.094324941 phi [ x 87809.73611468765+ 2x pi [y 2142470.094324941 = 2230279.8304396286 [G 9.8] *2230279.8304396286 = 21856742.33830836 21856742.33830836 meter = 0.000000002 light year phi 1.61803399 / 2230279.8304396286 = 7.25484743177297e-7 7.25484743177297e-7 degree = 0.000000008 quadrant 0.000000002 light year / 0.000000008 quadrant = 0.25*4 = 1 This is something extra, you can skip, but I added it anyway to show you the gravity and pi relation. 1 / 6.28318531 = 0.15915494302045 1 / 0.15915494302045 = 6.28318531000014 1 /28318531000014 = 3.53125661779386e-14 9.8 /3.53125661779386e-14 = 277521603800137.2 1 / 277521603800137.2 = 3.60332307938149e-15 9.8/3.60332307938149e-15 = 2719711717241344 1 / 2719711717241344 = 3.67686028508315e-16 1/3.67686028508315e-16 = infinity<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> NEXT......lol That is exactly the point here, the ruler are different, anyone can tell you that. Now lets see you find a value such like 15819225774831842, THE ONE I FOUND, and turn this into 9.8 meters = 1.03588 x 10-15 light years STOP MAKING EXCUSES, AND SHOW ME A NUMBER LIKE I HAVE SHOWN YOU AND OTHERS. You are not being fare, and you are making assumptions without providing proof of your speculation. If you talk the talk, then walk the walk. -
Can we compare notes????
I think out of the box replied to I think out of the box's topic in Speculations