I think out of the box

HAha! very funny The only thing I can tell you is that this value : 1.5819225774831842 joule = 9.873579833e+18 electron-volts. Place the number in a converter, I think you know what I mean. The Hubble and the p+ is proportional to this G value and that is this factor you are asking about. Now, I watched a video of yours last night on your tube channel, infact I stumbled upon it "really no joke!" This is what I found, BUT! Please have in mind that I did this at a very busy time, so excuse if I made errors, but it should be quite understandable I hope. Think in terms of black body radiation and standing waves. Now, this is the first time I have used this in "I guess", the correct "science method" I say that for a reason,with what I saw on your video. What my algorithm did hear is looped to 1. I am finding my algorithm does more than what I thought because I am learning many things here so, thanks!... Hope you reply. And if there are any errors tell me so I can fix them. 6.5 cm 6.0025 gh/s 6.5 cm= [x 0.67785464835938 6.0025 gh= [y 0.61659530457031 [x 0.67785464835938 cm *[y 0.61659530457031gh = 0.41796199335955 gh/s 0.41796199335955 centimeter/second = 0.00417962 meter/second 0.00417962 m/s - 299.792458 = -299.78827838 m/s -299.78827838 m/s / 299.792458 m/s = -0.99998605828836 m/s -0.99998605828836*100 = -99.99860582883599 percent error NOW, you remember in your video when you said that 6.5 c needs to be multiplied by 2 to get a completed cycle???? This may not be necessarily true. Here is why highlighted in red, and yes this is the pi thing again. 6.5 c *2 = 13 c 13 c *2450.000000 gh = 31,850,000000 gh 31,850,000000 gh centimeter/second = 318.5 meter/second NOW, this is where I come in: 1 / 318.5 = 0.00313971742543 <------------- that right there is pi ratio to 10e-2, just round this off and you get : 3.14* 10e-2 = 3.14*10e-2 = 0.314 Interesting how you round off using only numbers too right.>>>>?? Now, something else, this explains the "why" of: 6.5 c *2 = 13 c = "1" complete cycle when infact you are just squaring this 6.5 c in relation to pi ratio which is c and G, combined... "You said it yourself" "Electro Magnetic Wave Frequencies" with the speed of light, of which are 3 complete separate things, as per the science world. Or better still, 10e---------->3, how about that for methodology.....lol Hope you reply soon! Thanks!

yes this is exactly the point, what I find is the nothingness, the origin of the meaningless, here I will try once more and see if this works, otherwise I will take your advice here trust me. When I placed what I found without any knowledge of the numbers, and placed them in a relativity calculator this is what I got here for this number, I think you may see it somewhere in this thread above this. Here it is, but notice there is no radix dot of precession the number is free from precession. This allows me to further understand the "what" that defines this unit of "what ever it is connected to mass, kg, etc" 15819225774831842. Please think in terms of empty geometrical shapes that hold some type of value in empty space. Trust me, I have placed cooridnates using my algorithmic function and it shows the positions of the planet where it should be in the "physical world" I have images if you would like to see them, for now here is what this number states. Relativity Calculator A Relativistic Change Factor: 15819225774831842 Occurs At: 1 Light Speed OR 186282.397 Miles Per Second OR 299792.458 Kilometers Per Second Its that one 1 Light Speed that my algorithmic function looks for in relation to billions and billions of numbers... Hope this helps, let me know if you would like to see the "physical" proof of planetary movements, I have them ready. Thanks! PLEASE send me something with defined units please, something completed, then with this definition we can all see whats going on. I know work trust me, I can do this 100,000 millions times over until I get it right, I never stop..... thanks! PLEASE send me something with defined units please, something completed, then with this definition we can all see whats going on. I know work trust me, I can do this 100,000 millions times over until I get it right, I never stop..... thanks!

Yes thanks just looking at this an the explanation you gave makes sense, but what does not make any sense is why does the Lorentz function have to work with squared numbers? If you think for a moment a squared number basically loops that number and anything connected to it. There goes your ratios. These ratios are fractions of the whole ratio here, now when you also think about it many of the constants used today also have negative exponents in them too. These two things I mentioned is what I specialize in. What I do is understand the constants, not the function. I was told that the Lorentz transformations does not work with precession in fact I have been told many times that precession may not be possible to calculate at all in relation to physics. I think I have a solution here: Working with an algo rhythm I created, I found something very interesting that may far supersede Lorentz Transformation, when it is understood a little better by me. What I created is a hyper cube. What it does is create a manifold of many transformation not just one in relation to another, it predicts the origin, the source, the center. This is a very profound and deep discovery, this is why I am here explaining this to you guys. For now here are some figures I found: [X 1.627262* 10e-26 mass of a proton [Y 3.2*10e-18 Hubble constant relative area = 15819225774831842 <---NO PRESESION, NO RADDIX THE VALUE IS FREE HERE. I checked on an online calculaotr for this number 15819225774831842 and it appears to be interesting. I included what the calculator stated and here it is. Hubble online calculator: Hubble Parameter and Red Shifts Hubbel Distance: 15819225774831842 = r = 0.09502262443438923 c / (70 km/s/Mpc) = 407.23981900452526 Mpc = 1328.2668325791867 Mly I have no idea what that means.... But I do know what this means, its highlighted in blue. Relativity Calculator A Relativistic Change Factor: 15819225774831842 Occurs At: 1 Light Speed OR 186282.397 Miles Per Second OR 299792.458 Kilometers Per Second As you can see there is something wrong with any number that is squared when not used and understood correctly... I hope this makes more sense, you are more than welcome to check this yourself------>15819225774831842 You will see the same results. Thanks hope to hear from you soon!

thanks this makes better sense... I will get the book, ASAP! I need it...lol

What difference does it make, algo rythm or not, it's meaningless remember? I gave you the converged numbers, you were supposed to compare notes and finds here, all you did was accuse me of things and did not comply with the offer. Very very unfair, and the accusations made this worse! I think you were unfair here, through and through...

I have something that I have found but would like to get more feed back on this pertaining to the Hubble constant and the proton mass. It appears that these two elements have a relation to the h constant, gravity, and pi ratio squared, here is what I have found thus far and would like to understand more on this….. In my first find y is undefined, so I had nothing to work with, but this inverted gave me a defined value which I then could work with. I would like to know, if you find this interesting, as I am trying to get some information on this here, if there is something of interest you find, then I would like to share more information… I need to be clear that what I am calculating is an area of some type, but this inverts values in relation to constants of zero empty space. I think I have discovered an inverted manifold! Thanks! Hubble Constant = [x 2.05029496733635e+38 mass of a proton in kg = [ y 0 This is the inverted function Hubble Constant = [ x 1.39863399220286e+21 mass of a proton in kg =[ y 15819225774830694 [ x 1.39863399220286e+21+[ y 15819225774830694 = 15819225774831842 = relative area 1/15819225774831842 = 6.32142188393939e-17 299.792458/6.32142188393939e-17 = 4742484578693790000 6.626e-33*4742484578693790000 = 3.14237028184251e-14 3.14237028184251e-14^2 = 9.87449098820698e-28 = G =====??????

Thanks for telling me what your numbers were that was very nice of you, here are the new results. [x 2.05029496733635e+38 [ y = 0 Again here are your new numbers converged highlighted in blue: 3.2*10e-18= [x 2.05029496733635e+38 1.627262* 10e-26 = [ y = 0 Like I told you, this in relation to precession and zero empty. Again, what I am doing is calculating areas here that's all. This function is a manifold of zero empty space..The constants science usess are these empty shell spaces that I study in relation to 1. Since I have done much work here "twice already" even without having indication as to what you numbers were at first , can you tell me what this means in your terms and forget about everything else for now, including the numerology stuff... Also! when I knew what these numbers were, I inverted them in my function. So I hope this helps you get a better idea of what I did. Remember, all I am doing is calculating an area that's all. I have no other way of explaining this simple concept, but the math involved is something I would rather explain later, when I get more = responses here. Thanks!

The area are the exponents, they are inversed manifolds in space time geometry. But no luck here, like I said those numbers you gave are "precession" as with any precession this calculates to the "origin" and that origin is the center of mass, believe me I am shocked at the results, this means my function "does" do something quite interesting.... An exponent of -26 is like a cycle as with earth's precession of 26,000 years [that's an example] and a -18 is 180 degrees of this precession [also an example]. The physical connection here is the base 10 numeral exponents, "used in many physical constants." example: “G” = 6.67300 x 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2) this -11 is really 10, it loops from there. Try to understand the "exponents" here nothing else, that is the center of mass and gravity [empty space] , however these "numbers" you gave me here are related to quantum gravity as in that h constant of 6.626e-33 I used here. Also think in terms of 0/0 = but this 0 is pi ratio squared as G. Rember G does have units, but so does pi depending on the diameter used.... Sam relationship they have in harmony to empty space. Think in terms as "as x->0" I gave you the numbers I found highlighted in blue, now see what you find with them, that's why I placed them there and worked very hard, so please try to put in some info here... Also what are those numbers you gave me????? I think it is only fair you tell me, therefore we can be on the same page forget about words like coincidence because I can say this is "braking the laws of causality" of which I truly believe in. You said you would play the game, now lets see what you can come up with.. Here are my results for you: 1.627262* 10e-26 = [ x 1.39863399220286e+21 3.2*10e-18= [ y 15819225774830694 Do something with them....Let me see what is up here.. Thanks, I hope we find something even better with your knowledge too.. Lets work as a team, unified! Thanks!

The meaning of these numbers = Zero Empty Space. Pi Squared = G = 299.792458/6.32142188393939e-17 = 4742484578693790000 6.626e-33*4742484578693790000 = 3.14237028184251e-14 3.14237028184251e-14^2 = 9.87449098820698e-28 = G Your numbers you gave me are some type of precession, I know this from their negative exponents in relation to 1, but as you can see here, I took the ultimate derivitive to the center of mass itself in relation to c. But what really helped me is that I calculated an area with your numbers... What you gave me pertains to the outer shells of masses... Any mass for that matter. In your words, what were those values you really gave me??? Were you aware of what they truly were???? Here are your filtered numbers of which I calculated highlighted in blue: What do you think????? Is this pattern interesting to you?? 1.627262* 10e-26 = [ x 1.39863399220286e+21 3.2*10e-18= [ y 15819225774830694 THANKS, if this gets published I owe you credit!!!!!!!!!!!

Can we compare notes???? Can anyone send me 2 numbers of something you "know"? these can be anything in relation to time, gravity, even Lorentz transformations etc. I only need the numbers, not the explanation nor the technicals of what these numbers are and what they pertain too, for now at-least. This for examples can be the dirivitive of "anything" in science but would prefer this to be close to something dealing with c and or gravity.What I do is calculate past, present and future and return a sum in relation to precession. What I would like to see are "relative movements" in phases or precession, and "attempt only" to see if my function works with your given values, units and etc. If it does and you agree that something is interesting here, then I would need further help in understanding what my function is actually doing out of the realm of "standard science." This way instead of my theory, the theory can be better explained when we all see my returned results here, and maybe that in itself will do the explaining for all of us, when I see someone else seeing what I am seeing with what I do. I will take a deep breath here.... Thanks

Of coarse not, I wanted to tell you thanks mooey for the link, it really helped me understand something new, it explains something about the north poles, circles, pi ratio, gravity, and 1N of 10^3. When I understand this further, then I will get a more "modern" style to explain this to you all... Thanks for "looking" at everything that was very nice of you mooey, that's what I call---> noticing detail. Have a great day!

All i can say is this, "I" as a citizen depend on scientist for answers , I look up to you guys and feel awful when I see these types of remarks, post and sarcastic remarks from others, look at my "profile." I can only imagine how other people in this world feel too, especially now when we are faced with "many" issues that SCIENTIST CANNOT EXPLAIN. Perhaps working together we can help this world and especially our leaders. Until we all understand a different language , then perhaps we will be unified as 1. Obviously our "tools" of communication work much like weapons to wound other people's emotions, and of coarse comic photos such as these to further inflict this emotional pain., much like salt in the wound.....

Who said I hold this calender sacred?????? and on a personal level who are you to speak on behalf of other cultures???? And why use grammar as an excuse?? I thought scientist deal with facts...... right???? Please note here, all this is occurring because some of your members have snobby attitudes because they are politically involved in this "privately owned" forum....I am not going to sit here and let these types of things occur to me, as per the forum rules states that the level of education people have should not be an issues here, OBVIOUSLY IT IS! It just takes that one person to complain about it. The bottom line is this, to get respect, you need to give it, very simply stuff, it is called common sense....

YOUR NOT A SCIENTIST??????????? You really sound like one! GOOD JOB! Now I understand this better than ever..

the variables are the converged dates themselves, the variables are simple years nothing else cylces of time "years", this is very simple stuff here nothing complex, but I think the complex is what many are looking at confusing the simple... Here please look, these are the variables.. past year 1776 earth year next converged year 2012 earth year. next converged year for Uranus 2029 Use the year 2012 as delta x, you will then see precession reversal in the exponents not the derivative, this is a precession matter not a derivative matter, simple as x^n and y^n = n-n = 1 It is precession we are talking about in relation to reversals...By the way there is phisicall evidence all over the world of this time shift, many people have not understood how these actually work, what "really" occurred is that a quantum leap year has now commences for the winter of 2011, like I said in the previous post ""if you think I am lieing then place a birth date as 21-21-1971 in the online converter, you will see that the next birth date occurs in 12-21-2012 not 12-21-2011 as it is supposed to be"" Thanks Yes I have seen that comic photo of the Mayan Calender, not only is it an insult to the Mayan Culture but it is also a bias and racist statement towards others whom hold moral and are spiritually connected to time without the need for modern calculations, also it is against the forums rules to place photos that degrade and derail other cultures and or styles of religious beliefs systems and customs.... The statements on this comic photo personify the Mayan People as fear mongers or pranksters, giving them a "bad reputation" by the "artist" hired to create this to further " de-rail" them in the public eyes... I just want to make clear " that was "their" personal calender" Later, scientist "then" dug it up and brought it to the"public" for today's "main" stream "fear mongering" topics of which made "billions" since it all first began back in 2009. None including myself ever knew it ever existed... I also wanted to ask what was the "logic" of your statement that "you have seen other post of mine???" Are you stalking me???? Is it against forum rules to simply ask questions>>>???? Do you have a personal problem with me and my spiritual beliefs in the Mayan calender???? If so, then please ignore me and my post, no one here is "forcing" you to read my post, you do so on your "own" voluntary choice. The only "reason" I replied is because of your comic photo and its personification on , Mexicans, Indians, Africans and other third world countries whom have their "own" customs, Including Egyptians and Arabs.

Hello, I am trying to find out something about Earth and Uranus, it appears that they may be in phase some how in relation to precession. I have been experimenting with figures and differential calculus in relation to the dates of 1776 2012 and 2029, now these dates were given by an online year converter, I used a birth date to get these figures and was trying to use winter solstice as a starting period only... I am seeing this precession here with the year 2012. This year of 2012 is also used as the denominator or delta x, and yes I am trying to find a relation to the Maya End Date Calender here. Please note what I am also trying to do is get the derivative for "past" "present" and "future." The reason why this is so important to me is that the birth date that I used of Dec 21, 1971 converged with the online time converter "states" that the next birth date will be in Dec 20, 2012 on earth and not Dec 21,2011 as it should be celebrated here on earth, there appears to be some-type of odd reversal going on. Here is the time converterfor 12-21-71 ----next brithdate----->Thur, Dec 20, 2012 this is also one day "behind." If you think I am leing then please look at this yourself here: http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/age/, enter the birth date of 12-21-71 you will see that on earth it says that your next birth date is on Dec 20, 2012, when is should be Dec 21, 2011 becuase we still are not in this year of 2012 yet, [ but will be soon, it is now new years eve] there is something very wrong here. I think we misst out on some type of inversed leap year somehow. Also, I have been told to re-check this as adviced from users here, I have, but I think my point is not yet clear. Below are the derivatives and comparisons of these three times, 1776 past, 2012 present, 2028 future. 1 light year is being used as in 186,000 miles in relation to Julian dates and time. 2*1776 on earth = 3552 2*2029 on Uranus= 4058 3552 / 2012 = 1.76540755467196= RELATIVE TIME CHANGE! 1.76540755467196 mile = 3.003095864e-13 light year<--- PRECESSION! A baktun OF 13,000 YEARS?????? 1/3.003095864e-13 = 3329897030553.1343<--- NO PRECESSION!!!!!! ___________________________________________________________ 4058/2012 = 2.0168986083499= RELATIVE TIME CHANGE! SIMPLE STUFF! 2.0168986083499 mile = 3.430901751e-13 light year<--- PRECESSION! A baktun OF 13,000 YEARS?????? 1/3.430901751e-13 = 2914685620794.9746<--- NO PRECESSION!!!!!! There is also something else please. I have been working on maybe a function that helps here which is = 1 precession cycle of 26,000 earth years. Here is what I found using an original method: This is my original find outside of standard math and physics ->1.266117422e-12 light year<--- PRECESSION! This is what I feel is the change within 1 cycle of precession of 26,000 earth years relative to other celestial bodies in the heavens, and hence I can do this for anything in the known universe. 1.266117422e-12 light year<--- PRECESSION! 3.430901751e-13 light year<--- PRECESSION! A baktun OF 13,000 YEARS?????? 12-13= [+-1] There is so much more that I would like to share with people in the science world , but I really need to ensure what is going on here. My 25 years of research has led me to something that seems related to precession in time known as gravitational waves. Thanks, hope someone replies.

Thanks for responding! Well, I think its those dots that has me confused really, like here in this "example" 1.00/2 = 0.5 100/2 = 50 1.00/2e10 = 5e-11 100/2e10 = 5e-9 When I think fraction of the speed of light, what I envision are "sections" of time "trying" to be broken down as 1 m/s as c. I also think that somehow c tries to represent 1 as many fractions or "sets" of the same kind behind the scenes of our equations. What I am truly trying to find out is what this ralates to in red here: 1.00/12 = 0.08333333333333 = 0.08333333333333*299.792458 = 24.98270483333234 24.98270483333234/2 = 12.49135241666617 m/s It looks like 0.08333333333333 represents 12 somehow in another form. AND! we all know that 12 represents 1 cycle in time as 60 minutes "and" 60 seconds just like a completed cycle of 100 % of time = 24 hours in a day. Again like 2 representing the same thing---->60 minutes "and" 60 seconds like twins! or even gravity twins, yin and yang, north and south I think you get the point. I think the issue stems for me to really acknowledge what c "truly" is in relation to 1 Newton as this too represents 1 of 10^3 k. Yes I know newtons measure force grams and gravity, but they seem all "laced" together... I know per fact that the way c is used today is not correct. There is something else to this number. Very very confusing believe me.. Thanks! hope you reply...

Hymm, this kinda works but still confused, it is this right here highlighted in bold that gets me confused here. 0.5%/299.792458 = 0.00166782047599 0.00166782047599*10 = 0.0166782047599 mph ?? and this too: 0.76%/299.792458 = 0.00253508712351 0.00253508712351*10 = 0.0253508712351= 0.0253508712351 mph ?? Would these fractions of the speed of light be the same as 8/100% 8%/100 = 0.08 "percent" You see the % and fraction of the speed of light is what I get lost in, I am looking at this as a tax return or a transaction or something like that, it is the fraction and their meaning that is very very confusing when dealing with fractions of the speed of light because it is = 1. Thanks.... 0.01*10 = 0.1 = mph = 5 mph??

Hello, I am confused on fractions of light. I have heard that .5 c is 1/2 the speed of light = 299.792458 How so????? is it: 1/ 299.792458 2/299.792458 3/ 299.792458 Also, is 1 second = 299.792458 "and" is the fraction "remaining" 1 as well? And in Lorentz transformation does this fractions of the speed of light " take on" another hidden value which "still" means "this" fraction of the speed of light as well? Thanks, but I have always been confused about this, and no matter how much I have studied it, it just never seems to make sense because I confuse as to what these " fractions of the speed of light" are referring to in relation to time.

thanks, but I have one more question if you do not mind, how do scientist like you calculate fractions of the speed of light, and what does 1 squared mean??? I always thought that 1 squared was just 1, thanks!

Ok, that sounds like a great idea thanks, happy new year! This sounds very interesting!!!!!!!!!! Then if this is true can you say that earth as we know it to be can be a singularity in itself in reference to other worlds?

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! can this be used with precession too?

This now makes better sense thanks! but one more question though, I use dates in the future for my astrology and astronomy programs and use birth dates, and this never happens..... With your explanation this may just be how the programs are just built then, but I do find this strange though, thanks! have a great day. Then it seems that the future and dates are related to planetary relative precession. But really I need to ask this now please...... Is there any resources out there you can advice me on that can calculate in the future in relation to planetary motions "via dates"???? For example, I have astrology and astronomy programs, but they only place the planets where they should be in the future not a date conversion to the planets date time and year to itself relative to its position of earth's time and year. So, this may be related to space time geometry then right? IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE FOR A PROGRAM TO DO THAT???

Did that same issue, but I am not using my b-date, what I am "seeing" is that this online calender does not give me birth dates after 2012 it is stuck...... why is this??? have you checked to confirm this????

Hello, I have been using this online converter that stops at the year 2011 but mostly 2012. Here:http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/age/ I have been asking my friends and they have seen the same thing. I enter birth dates to check ages on other worlds and etc, then I noticed it froze after a birth date of the year 2011 or 2012.. As I know there are many people here with an outstanding credibility and good reputation, I am sure you can give me some knowledge as to what is going on here.. I have also been seen in many astronomical programs including my own that the sun is placed in every "other" constellation. Example when it should be in Saggitarius it is in Capricorn, and when the sun should be placed in Leo it is in Virgo.. I am eager to hear from those with bachelors degrees and masters degrees bring some light on this question.... or anyone for that matter... Thanks I am truly honored....