njaohnt

That's only true if the people who wrote the Bible were lying. Show me evidence of them, and once again, that was not the purpose of that post! If you think they have good evidence, maybe you should believe in them! Read the NIV translation. Notice anything?

(sorry about putting none instead of non, they're all like that because I copied, and pasted)Show me why those are just as good to believe in. The purpose of that post was not to show how all other religions are wrong, but just in specific, atheism. After being a Christian for how many years you have failed to see the purpose in what it says. Look at where it says that. Notice anything abnormal compared to how the Bible puts out other laws(laws that are straight forward).

Yes. https://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C1GPEA_enCA328CA328&aq=0&oq=does+a+sponge+soak+&sugexp=chrome,mod=4&ix=h9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=why+does+a+sponge+soak+up+water#hl=en&rlz=1C1GPEA_enCA328CA328&sclient=psy-ab&q=does+a+sponge+soak+up+water&oq=does+a+sponge+soak+up+water&gs_l=serp.3..0i5.4051.6775.1.7044.4.3.0.0.0.1.191.509.0j3.3.0...0.0.-UpCQtm-Op8&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=c0a71f853a7e4a00&biw=1280&bih=668 None of the web pages say "Does a sponge soak up water", because it is obvious that it does. Thus same evidence = same conclusions Thus same conclusions = same evidence Obviously same evidence = same probably reality And same probable reality = best thing to believe Unless same evidence = same none probable reality And same none probable reality = risky to not believe However Atheism = not risky to not believe So same probable reality = best thing to believe = Christianity = best thing to believe Unless same evidence = same none probable reality And same none probable reality = risky to not believe However Atheism = not risky to not believe So same probable reality = best thing to believe = Christianity = best thing to believe Any disagreement? No sorry, I don't see it. Please be more specific.

So? Those don't deny each other, and I really don't think that you understand them. Perhaps you should see http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205-6&version=NIV How are they contrary to each other? I have not found that at all. Yes What religious sites have you seen? Certainly not the ones that the people in the video were at. And you're saying I look like that? Ha. Yeah right. Give me an example of where I said "I can't hear you!"(or I refused to hear you). The angels have their decisions to make, too. People have not done evil?

The Devil created Hell, and God doesn't allow impurities. Where else are to go? Maybe you should watch another one to get more evidence?

Countless Miracles! I referred to this guy as "the dude in South America who heals people" I found a webpage about him. http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Science-Religion/2002/11/John-Of-God-Investigating-A-Brazilian-Faith-Healer.aspx?p=1 Yes, he has lots of religions, but God works in mysterious ways, doesn't he? There's also someone like that in my church. There are countless miracles! Is that impossible? Where does it say that? Just because the moon is a light doesn't mean it produces its own light! No! It went from hundreds to hundreds of thousand in a few hundred years, so God's people were prosperous! Evolution? What? I have feeling that you just got this from a website without looking at it. Pi is pretty close to three. Of course they're not going to have it exact. That's not really what it is saying. It says we can't move it. It's kind of different from what you're saying. Didn't I already explain this? He doesn't believe that Krishna can heal him. He does believe that God can heal him. Which is more probable? An atheist not following evidence is like a Christian not believing in Jesus. Yes, but Christianity follow the Bible the best (I find). As long as you follow the Bible, you're following the "One true way" How they were written. The only way that the Bible could be false(and God) is if those books were written by greedy people wanting money. I doubt that because of how they were written, their length, etc.

Why do you keep on saying this, you say miracles aren't evidence? Why? Countless miracles. What makes you so sure that the Bible is not true? There is no evidence suggesting it is false(except predeterminations) the only reason is that it lacks evidence, and when something lacks evidence, you go out and get evidence, to become a good skeptic. Sitting around not looking for evidence is what a bad skeptic does, become a good skeptic! A lie? That's a predetermination! Predeterminations lead to false theories! You don't get it, do you. After you read the Bible, you don't understand. It's not the fact that you don't believe. It is because you have sinned. The only way for a sinner to get to heaven is to have God forgive your sins. How can He forgive you if you don't think He exists? I have showed that video. Watch more if you have to, but don't call them falsehoods, unless you actually go to Israel and show us!How did the Bible fail? Predeterminations? How? I believe the videos. I would go to Israel, but you wouldn't believe me, would you?

(con't) ... Before you say this, maybe you should go to Israel and actually give evidence! You have know evidence that it is false, and the video is evidence of itself! What are going believe? Go out and show Science Forums what you find in Israel, but don't do this! This is an example of a bad skeptic. Before examining evidence of this, Moontanman has said that this is a spinel, not a not a ruby. He says that this is spinel because of a predetermination that the Bible is false. Remember, a predetermination leads to a false theory.

Here's the excuse for God not being "here" enough. Evidence: I believe that God does things for a better world. So, therefore: He gives us a the ability to do what ever we want (would you want to be a puppet)? Giving us this ability includes being evil, and not believing Him Thus some people will be a "skeptic"(the next evidence area will explain why I put skeptic in quotes) and not believe him, and others will not follow Him He doesn't want anyone to go to Hell (no impurities can be let in heaven, otherwise it would become like the earth with its evil people) The more a miracle happens, the less it seems like a miracle(consider 'Why does a miracle imply the existence of a Christian god, rather than merely implying that there are parts of reality we do not fully understand? God is not the only explanatory option; it could be any other force that we don't yet understand, including natural ones. "I don't know why that happened" doesn't mean "God must have done it." Not until we understand the universe well enough to eliminate every other possibility. ', imagine if things like these happened all the time! Everyone would think like this. If this happens to Christians only, then how come it doesn't it happens to Atheists(prove me wrong)? If you're seriously going to say that some force allows this to happen to Christians only, then wouldn't the theory that God did it have more evidence? Thus, less miracles, more Christians (though, God does have to keep the miracles going, or no one would believe that He is real). This explains why He doesn't do every miracle that would make the world better(except for the ones that would lead more people to Him). I think that this makes it so that no one can ever put evidence against God. The only reason why anyone wouldn't believe in Christ after reading this, is because they say it lacks evidence. Don't you agree? More Evidence: Are you a "skeptic"? If so are you a good skeptic, or a bad skeptic? I will show you the difference in a sort of a parable way. Let's say there is a miner. He used to mine in a old mine, but now that mine has closed. He goes to another mine for a job. "Okay," said his manager, "I always go to the mineral scientist to check if what I have is what I think it is, even if I'm sure I know what it is. I recommend that you do that, too, even though he charge 5% of its value." The miner never bothered to check his minerals because he thought that he was experienced enough to skip the step. One day he came across some spinel. As usual he went to the desk to pay for it, and he would go off to his shop to sell it. But the cashier said "Hey, why are trying to trick me? Don't you know that they have no tolerance for this? You're going to get fired!". The manager came and immediately fired him. The spinel was a ruby. (this is just considering that God is true, if you don't believe Him, allow and study over the spinel being a ruby, please) The miner is a bad skeptic, the first manager is a good skeptic, the 5% payment is the time and effort it takes to create a proper theory, the cashier is the angels of God, the second manager is God, the spinel that the miner had seen before was the correct theories of the Atheists, the ruby is Christianity, the thinking that the ruby was spinel is the the incorrect theories of the Atheists, and getting fired was going to Hell. Let's use a true story to prove that. I heard of a scientist who the found a new mineral. It looked a lot like a lot like another mineral. He was a good skeptic, and did tests to find out that it wasn't what he expected. I will explain why you Atheists are bad skeptics (or not even skeptics at all) shortly... Anyway, do you think that Charles Darwin went into making his theory saying "I don't know what happened earlier so I will find out."? No! He said "Christianity has insufficient evidence, I will figure out what happened". This is a predetermination. You cannot create a proper theory through predetermination. By doing this you base your theory on biases. To create a proper theory you need to let in all possibilities (being open-minded), and study them, which many Atheists have failed to do. I don't think that Charles Darwin tried to figure out how Christianity could/is true. I will explain why you Atheists are bad skeptics (or not even skeptics at all) shortly...

So, you're saying that if thermolysis occurred, the heat would be used up in the thermolysis reaction, right?

If this true http://www.ahanw.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=602 (that hydrogen burns at 4000F) then wouldn't thermolysis occur when the hydrogen combines when oxygen, since at 4000F water would have the hydrogen separate from the oxygen(it seems impossible since there would be continuous energy being produced if the hydrogen were burned again)?

Such as what? What would force would do such things? Let's say that He does exist, for sure, for now. How, are you going to go to heaven if you keep on saying that there could be some other force doing it. You're now going against what atheism is all about. Evidence. If there is evidence for a god, and you continue to say "Why does a miracle imply the existence of a Christian god" that is worse than saying "I think that the evidence of God is greater than the evidence of atheism". Do you see what you're saying here? Do all you people who pressed +1 realize this? Maybe you should spend another 10 minutes... Did I not say "A fake?" at the end of my post? You can make a fake, but what do you want? The reason why I think that God doesn't make tons of miracles like you say He should, is because then you would get people like Cap'n Refsmmat. The less a miracle happens, the more people who see the miracle, take it as a miracle. Then why aren't new animals coming out? It seems more like we were given 1 chance...all these years, what animals have come out?

Yeah, but why did the needle not go in? I think God healed him. What? What had a one in a million chance of happening, and was given ten billion tries?

Oh good! that's what they want? I have some evidence like that(if you were there, which I wasn't, which is why I doubt you'll take this as a miracle)! Evidence There was someone who was getting a large needle for cancer. The doctor was unable to put the needle in. It was not going in. Later they realized that the cancer was gone. A miracle? Oh, and here is some more evidence that you can feel and touch(if you were there). Evidence Maybe you should watch all of them... A fake?

Me too. I think that he is talking about places just for atheists.

That's not true. Where did the word "evidence" come from? People made it up. I was thinking about this. Why do wee need evidence? There is not enough evidence against this. If you want evidence, I will give you evidence. I don't think it is necessary. The only reason why you would want evidence is if you're talking about something completely wrong, which God is not completely wrong. Is there any thought in your mind that you might be the one who is wrong? How sure are you that what the Christians is horse feathers? Maybe what you think is the real horse feathers. Again, you want evidence, evidence you will get. I don't understand how you think that listening to some "good" atheist scientists is better. The "Tres Juicy made the World" theory is something that I would ask evidence of. More so, there already enough evidence against atheism, and enough evidence with Christianity from just looking out the window. No. In fact, it is the opposite.

I don't think that anyone got the soul thing. Does my older post help? From the anti big bang case for a creator thread.

Then no, that is not what I meant by soul.I meant more that a soul is a what makes you who you, setting you apart from other people, and the thing that feels your consciousness so that you can be here, and not just have your brain living the world. If you don't understand some evidence, that doesn't make it not evidence, it's just not evidence for you. Yes, it is also evidence of the Big Bang, and every other stories of how the world came to be. That's not evidence. Anyone could just do anything with it, you could have even copied it from somewhere else. I'll use the "Tres Juicy made the world" theory. Just saying something doesn't make it evidence(a little, but hardly any). The Tres Juicy made the world theory uses actual evidence and observation of the great Tres Juicy(note that you could have put scientists such as Charles Darwin here) to describe the way things have been made over the years. Thanks for showing me instead of just telling me to research.

I doubt you usually read my posts. That's like robbing someone, and then going to court, and telling the judge that he is cruel, and that he never knew that he couldn't rob people. YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD! It depends on how you think of it. How are you thinking of it? You don't understand it. Just like the last time. It is very hard to explain. That is the best I could do. Oh wow. There are miracles happening. The fact that we are here and had to come from somewhere. You won't take them as evidence. Let me ask you. What evidence is there that the Big Bang, and evolution are real. You can't use the fact that we are here as evidence. You can't use "scientific miracles" like anything to do with dark matter, or anything that lacks much evidence like that. What evidence do you now have? Not once have I said "God is real because the Bible says so and the Bible is the word of God, who is real because the Bible says so." though I have used the Bible as evidence, not as a main usage of evidence. I did, weather you think so, or not(though I only read the parts that peaked my interest in the really long one, because I have more important things to do than read all that). Still, how do things evolve? I still think that if you're right we should have wings. Give me an example of something that would, and would evolve. I'm confused about why you would think such a thing. EDIT: One of my answers didn't match the correct quote. So you're saying that the only way it can be a miracle is if clouds appeared in the sky? That's too picky. Are you saying that the evidence in the universe that the Big Bang is real is not evidence, because there are so many other ways that the universe could have been created (including by a god). That's what it seems I would be to you if I were like you, which I am not. No. This is the best way I could think of explaining it. It is very hard to explain. You don't get it. I think that it would be helpful for us to have wings. Isn't that how evolution works?

Oh wow, that lacks so much evidence.

I have gathered some evidence. Before I say it, you atheists really need to realize that you're dealing with something very big here. By the posts I've seen that it seems that you're not 99% (or more) sure that Christianity is false. It seems like 10, 20, or even 30% that Christianity is true. Is this true? The thing is that if you're wrong, you go to hell. I don't want to be mean, but you don't seem to realize how serious this is. Evidence: http://runnemederemembered.blogspot.ca/2009/04/doesnt-it-always-rain-on-good-friday.html How many years does it take for an "odd coincidence" become a miracle? More evidence: Now I've tried to explain this before, but I don't think anyone understood. Our souls. How did they become here? You would say that they don't exist, wouldn't you? I don't think that that is possible. Now I would ask you some questions here, but there are obvious answers, so I'll answer them myself. Me: Why are you you and not someone else? You(if you're an atheist): Because I was born in myself, not in anyone else's. Me: Why weren't you born as someone else? You: Because that is how my brain came to be! Me: So you're brain operates on electrical signals that make you know that you are you? You: Yes. Me: So you feel your sense your brain signals, and not some else's? Why? You: Because those are my brain signals, and not yours. Me: Why? You: Because they are in my head! Me: How is that your head? You: I was born with it! You see how this is? You are feeling your brain signals with something... a soul, electrical signals don't feel themselves. More evidence: Somethings to think about... http://web001.rbc.or...ence-of-god.pdf More evidence: This is not much evidence, but I think that to world is too complex, and amazing for a god to have not have created it. More evidence: Now this may not be evidence, but wouldn't we have grown wings by now if evolution were real?

Working on my fuel cells, I've got quite excited about how all them can interact, but there is one thing that I'm stuck on. The Mg(OH)2 made a fuel cell. What can you do with it? You can change it into MgO + H2O, H2O is useful for fuel cells, but MgO is not useful, however Mg would be, and O would be, too. Can you change MgO into Mg + O somehow?

Yes, but the negative energy is still there. For somethings they don't cancel out each other.

No, you don't understand the verse. Look at it again. If you're in the KJV I recommend you switch to NIV because KJV is even more confusing. About the first part… Do you really have to point out every little thing I say? Does a reason have to mean that it's right? No. Stop look at the little things I say and start looking for the big ones. I've decided to stop posting here, and just post evidence in my Christian Evidence now. No. I don't think she have stopped for the noise. I would say it is a miracle. Perhaps God realized that you are going to be a Christian in the future, or somehow the world would be better with you. It's the Devil, not God who is punishing you. Notice how these are so obviously wrong? We can't measure it, but we can look at miracles.

It never said that you could see the whole world, it just said that the Devil showed Jesus all the kingdoms of the world, which could have happened with a miracle. Miracles match realality, because many Christians have experianced them, like my mom. Now, it's not like this was impossible, but have you ever been walking, and then you just stop, for no reason? You have no clue how stopped. That happened to her, when she was walking towards her car in a parking lot. She was very close, then, she stopped, and a dump truck ran right over her car. Why?1. Christianity is the biggest religion in the world 2. I have never seen any miracles from other religions I think that it means there will be more of them, and they will be more severe. All unjustness will be made up to the Christians after their death. It doesn't say you can't. But there's lots of evidence, it's not blind.