§lîñk€¥™

I hope it's in Sci-am, because I have about 300 news scientists but only a handful of sci-ams. Give me a day or two and I'll see if I can dig it out.

Nothing wrong with being curious. In fact, if you were not curious I would find that more "wrong". Sorry if my reply seemed to be harsh or offensive. It was not intended that way. kind regards

I see no evidence to support that assertion, or any logical argument that would lead to that conclusion. Maybe I am just dense. kind regards

That just begs the question, IMHO: If you don't know the meaning then how can you claim it has any meaning. kind regards

No, and I never claimed to have a proof. I made my statement based on logic. The logic being that to be outside space and time is a meaningless statement because without space and time what have you got? No space and no time. When and where is that precisely? kind regards

No worries, and thanks for being congenial about it. kind regards

Fafalone, I feel I owe you an apology. I took the time to download the programs and view what you had offered. Had I know how much information was there (200 pages +) I probably would'nt have asked for the format change. Anyways, it was only a small thing. No hard feelings I hope? There's none here (hey, I might need to pick your brains in the future. I don't need to make an enemy of you and certainly don't desire it). As to some of the other comments here. Grow up people. That's the worst kind of bandwaggoning and supposedly intelligent people should have more pride in their behaviour than to think a couple of misplaced words describes someones whole character. If I find a way to convert them and keep their quality I will let you know. kind regards

:lame: Sheesh, don't lose your rag mate. I made simple request and you immediately call me lazy and now I should f' off. I can see why you're not in public relations. kind regards

Hang on, I'm lazy because you expect everyone else to download programs to view something you are offering? Now add in all the other 5 minutes that other people without these programs would have to take. 10 minutes of your time v. 5x people's time. kind regards

We'd have to re-write the physics books. kind regards

No. There is no "outside" the universe. Not even a vacuum. kind regards

I read an article sometime back, I think in New Scientist (or maybe Scientific American) that, simply put, said the reason we cannot reach absolute zero is because in trying to remove the last quanta of energy we have to introduce energy into the system which, of course, then replaces the energy we are trying to remove. I'll try and find this article if anyone is that interested (but only if someone specifically request it). kind regards

I'm the same. I know SR pretty well but GR is a little vague to me. I too will be researching this and will let you know if I turn up anything that confirms or refutes my suggestions. kind regards

This is always a hard one for people to get to grips with (some are lucky and can make the conceptual leap easily). The Universe is expanding but it does not fill anything up. Hard to imagine as it sounds, but the Universe is "making" space whilst expanding not expanding into a space. :scratch: kind regards

Its is a pain when you click quote instead of edit. Just use "back page" on your browser. kind regards