Jump to content

richph

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by richph

  1. I think Dad's trying to promote his book at the same time as unleashing his theory on the world
  2. My father's answer as follows :- A Black Hole in our ocean of energy would be akin to a vortex.It would be composed of energy on the ultimate of short wave lengths,especially at the end of the funnel, prior to regressing back to a straight line at minus 273 degrees celsius.The end of the circle where the mass becomes extremely dense before the straight line.It would be cold and all other wave lenghts,including those of light, would be attracted to its centre.
  3. I am sorry this reply has taken so long, my father resides in Perth, Austalia, and we contact each other by e-mail, the problem is he's a novice when it comes to using his computer and my request for him to send me a synopsis of his theory by e-mail has been fraught with problems, but he has, finally, managed it, and is as follows :- In his latest book ' A Message from Moses ' published in Australia, December 2007, Mr. H J Pengelly-Phillips reiterates that existing theories on the structure of the universe are flawed only because scientists are viewing the universe from the wrong place.The are standing on the earth which along with the galaxy and the sun is travelling through space at an enormous velocity and thus see everything orbiting everything else. Like a passenger in a moving car, as opposed to a bystander on the highway, the views can be different. A little consideration serves to show that an independant observer standing still outside the galaxy will realize that, since the universe is apparently composed of spinning moving spheres, any point on any sphere at any instant is generating a sine wave in space. Thus the spheres consist of interwoven sine waves with each group of sine waves encompassing others. The earth's group of sine waves are describing sine waves about the Sun's group, the Sun's group about the galaxy's group, each of their surfaces about their centres. Nothing is in orbit. Everything is created by any initial movement in an ocean of energy at minus 273 degrees Celsius culminating in these interwoven layers of sine waves. This movement was probably initially generated by temperature difference and is an ongoing phenomenon. The greater the number of layers the nearer to mass. This ocean of energy, if dormant, being composed of straight lines without length or breadth would have been devoid of mass. There appear to be seven layers. Thus, just as ocean can sustain currents by temperature differences, space can sustain motions with varying energy levels where concepts of time, mass, area, acceleration, and volume tend to merge. A study of the movments of the planets in our solar system will show that these sine waves are related by a single ' law ' If b is the instantaneous relative distance between any two bodies or particles v is their instantaneous relative velocities k is a constant of energy Then b multiplied by v squared is equal to k. The attached chart where the logarithms of b and v for our own solar system are plotted,will immediately demonstrate the accurate way in which these bodies conform to the ' law ' including, it will be noted, the planet Pluto.Therefore all sine waves in space must be connected by this law. Further observation suggests -- That all natural wave forms of any description, ( sound waves etc. ) eventually return to the calm of a straight line and this urge to return to a straight line is the single force that holds everything together in the universe.We call it gravity. Thus the earth, as its centre attempts to return to a straight line, will be attracted to the sun's centre simply because its centre is nearer a straight line than the centre of the earth. The earths surface to its own centre, the sun to its centre, all for the same reason and because of the layers, ad infinitum.This is the force of gravity. Temperature itself appears to be on a wave form. We start with the straight line at minus 273 degrees celsius, then, as the layers increase we get to the heat of the sun. Further progress takes us to the atomic or seventh layer which is cool. As the number of layers increase the wave forms get smaller and if taken to the limit will ultimately regress to a straight line and return to minus 273 degrees Celsius. This confirms that the centres of these apparent spheres should indeed be hotter than their surfaces. Relative to our observer and space the earth must be travelling faster than the sun. Everything including distance is relative. All processes are reversible. Light with fewer layers can be produced before mass. The enigma of wave-particle duality can, perhaps, be explained. Time, clearly, is unimportant. Finally no matter where we stand and stare in the universe its mathematics remains unchanged so existing equations etc., if correct remain valid. I would be grateful for your comments, I will let my father know about your black hole question and get back to you
  4. I'd like to introduce myself, it's the first time I've been on this forum. My name's Richard Phillips and I'm from Oxford. I would like to give you all a bit of a background as to why I would like to post a new theory. It may be a little long winded, I hope you'll bear with me. My father came up with this theory about 60 years ago, and has been developing it ever since. He now claims that he has perfected it, and it is a theory of everything. As you can imagine I have been a captive audience for 50 of those 60 years. So what I thought I'd do is post on a scientifc forum, so that experts in this field could study it, believe me I'm no expert (except maybe about watching football on the telly). So here goes! He believes that the universe is a lake of energy, and everything passing through it is moving along a sine wave from photons to stars. The measurement of these sine waves determines the state of the object. For example, a star is moving along a longer sine wave than a planet, in other words, the shorter the sine wave the more mass the object has, and the less heat it generates. He has some formulae that he says corroborates what he's saying. This obviously is a very short condensed version, mainly because I don't understand most of it. If it all sounds like gibberish, I will understand if there are no replies, but what I'm really looking for are questions that may perhaps put holes in the theory. How can you have a theory of everything if you don't know everything?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.