Callipygous

if you sexy(sec) you have a sexy tan (sec tan) if you have a tan your sexy squared. (tan --> sec sec) : )

overwhelmingly male too...

the problem in that thread seems to be the wording. there is a difference between hitting a child for discipline and abusing them. i would define abuse as excessively violent or unnecessary hitting. there is nothing wrong with spanking your children as discipline. there is something wrong with punching them in the face for anything.

i had a very similar problem. my younger sister is a total brat. we would get into arguments and my parents would say stupid things like "dont listen your your brothers jess, they are just being rude." and then the stupid bastards would expect us to babysit her. after hearing that kind of thing you think shes gonna listen to anything we say? of course not. i solved the problem. i told her to stop doing something and she played the game where as soon as you get up to do something about it they run away and promise not to do it again, then when you sit down they do it again, repeat. after the second time i told her i was gonna smack her across the head if she did it again. she did it again, tried to play her game, and it worked untill i caught up and smacked her across the head. she listens now. its been years, and taking on a serious tone still gets her to knock it off.

i think hitting is necessary. i would define beating differently though. beating is something i would define as unnecesarily rough or violent discipline. a spanking is a whole different story. when i threw a brick at my brother and hit him in the head (he stole my bike GET OFF ME), my mother smacked the bejeezus out of me, i would expect any parent to do the same. it needs to be done as discipline, not just a way to relieve your anger or frustration, and it needs to not be excessive. aside from that i say go for it.

feel free to include me if you wish. 5'2" brown "wavey" hair usually about 2 inches long(right now more like 4) brown eyes. i never wear pants. (by which i of course mean shorts only )

oh come on. we all kno youve got something more than an arrow to the face and a bird mauling... dont be shy, we wont laugh. or at least you wont know we did. ; ) i got another one: trampoline. backflips, frontflips, over and over again, for about a year, no problems. then one day i go to do another backflip and for some reason i go back instead of up. and land on the fence... gee, i think to myself, that sure was wierd... lets do that right. backflip, straight into the fence again... havent done one since.

encyclopedia. does that count as one book? tao te ching. you can spend YEARS trying glean info from that book. and arive no where... or if your really creative you can come away wise. and... : P i dont know... "Lamb: the gospel according to biff"? not for any special purpose, just my life without that book would be boring and dull by comparison.

you are a kid. genius is overrated (literally). find something worth while to brag about.

which one of those is supposed to be fatal? the balcony one maybe, but that wasnt him. i feel like im forgetting stuff... me and my brother were terrible children. oh, we lit off a model rocket engine without a rocket... they like to fly back and forth over your head when you do that : P

hes right guys... just look at the combined idiocy weve managed to get in this thread... some of us individually are lucky to be alive, when you put us together...

you just forgot to clamp your hands over your ears before you hit...

which is FREAKING AWESOME. wheres the stupid in that one? i go cliff jumping all the time.... dont think i have quite hit 35 meters tho... as a matter of fact... isnt 35 meters getting up into bone breaking range? sure you dont mean 35 feet? (50 feet is enough to make me have to not look over the edge before i do it)

lol... only time i have jumped off of a roof there was a pool underneath. i did run through a glass door though... stitches from that one. anyone else ever shoot a spud gun straight up to see how close an area you could get it to come back down in?

i forgot a few... 4. hairpin in the wall socket. that was fun... especially when i tried to pull it out so i wouldnt get caught. 5. similar to dak... mine involved a rollerblade ramp. two older boys holding my wrists and sprinting towards it to see how far we could get me to go. at least i learned some science with pretty much all of mine... especially the wall socket and the gasoline. did you know its actually fairly hard to get a tank of gas to explode? unless the mixture is right it just burns...

it doesnt? bah... they work fine for grounding out the tube in your tv when you need to fix it...

1. using my telescope to fry ants, and looking through the view finder to make sure it was pointed the right way. 2. rubbing my eyes after de-seeding some jalepenos 3. lighting a toy on fire on my driveway and THEN deciding it needed more gasoline.

3,4,5 5,12,13 and any multiple of those, so 10, 24, 26 would be one. so is 6,8,10 and 9,12,15. i think there is another commonly used set, but i forgot what it was.

interesting... the only game i have ever played that might help with shooting skills would be duckhunt, seeing as how its one of the only ones with an actual gun. the others are all arcade games. you dont get shooting skill from WASD and a mouse... if you do console mode, joysticks arent exactly gats either. such stupid arguments the conservative moms try to make...

will nothing ever make people happy? everyone complains about how the movies suck because they dont match the book and how "tolkien wasnt writing an action flick." and then people complain about the only material in the damn thing that tries to include the other stuff... *sigh*

its not that all people who play such games are murderers. its that the personality of a murderer a murderer is also a personality that likes to play dnd. its sort of like if serial killers went on runs everyday to stay in shape for their killings these people would be saying runners are more likely to be serial killers. you can spin data around anyway you like. you could also state it as people who dont run are less likely to become serial killers.

i voted yes, mainly because i have my ideal dog right now. im not worried about losing my lifelong pet, and i understand a clone would not be my dog. but the dog i have right now is non-agressive, and always has been. shes sort of a runt of the litter. shes a lemon beagle, similar to the regular kind only with much lighter tones. so shes perfect size, disposition, i like the color... all round cool dog.

that doesnt make sense. the actually velocity of the water isnt higher, just the amount that passes a certain point in a given time. so the volume that can pass in a certain time should be higher, but i cant think of any reason the speed of the water should be higher, and therefore any reason it should reach a greater height. am i missing something?

wheres the line between that and using an analogy to make a point? i just remember from some debate we had you told me i was using a strawman when i really just meant it as a way of expressing the thought. it might have been the pedophile thread.