-
Posts
1771 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Callipygous
-
most people's sexual orientations dont involve psychological trauma to another person.
-
ill do it! whys that coral?
-
its a little too vast for me to believe life hasnt sprung up ANYWHERE else in the universe.
-
i suppose i cant speak for her, but i think thats what she meant. well just have to wait : P
-
shes telling you she(and the rest of the normal population) has never been tempted to have sex with a prepubescent boy. and you know thats what she meant. lets not play games. : P
-
i dont think you need to worry bettina... from what i have read here it seems he loses interest at puberty. your what? 17?
-
the people in UK are idiots. kids modeling underwear is not porn, porn requires a sexual element. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pornography 1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
-
drawings and sculptures are not pornography. as for tapes/pictures/whatever with the boys who werent abused in the production, if it is porn, and they are prepubescent, it was abuse, whether it was consenting or not. exposing a child to sexuality before they develope enough to be ready for it causes psychological trauma. its abuse.
-
i dont know about germany, but in the US you are unlikely to find pictures of naked children in any of those places, and there arent many nude beaches. your best bet would probably be the book store, but even in that your more likely to find a sketch or a diagram in a medical or science text than an actual picture. and you will find absolutely no nudity on tv.
-
im going to bet that most of the teenage boys in this day and age have seen pictures of naked prepubescent girls. i know i have. this is the age of the internet, which means when the horny teenagers are getting their fix they turn to things like Kazaa. Every now and then when your looking for some fun pictures you get a couple that shouldnt be there...(in numerous catagories, "lolita" is only one of the types of pictures that can show up that make you regret turning to the internet)
-
when culture starts defining half of the population as property instead of people with rights its no longer worth respecting.
-
i thought hetero and homo only referred to gender, why would it matter if they are attracted to younger or older memebers of the other sex?
-
Q. why did billy fall off the swing? A. he had no arms. Q. why did johnny fall off his bike? a. someone threw a fridge at him. whats the difference between a baby and a banana? a banana doesnt scream when you peel it.
-
18 here, but yes. a good point. but i dont think ill have that problem. i think there is a big enough difference between feeling sympathy for someone and condoning sex with a child that ill be able to keep the two sepperate.
-
thats not really true. i get urges toward plenty of girls that are under the legal age. technically i was under the legal age up untill a couple months ago, at which point who the rapist is just depends on who reports it first (no joke, in california, if two 17 year olds have sex the first one to step into the police department is the victim) so if i had sex with every girl i had urges toward i would be a statutory rapist (no idea how to spell statutory : P ) not to mention the fact that they would not all say yes. any way... none of this is really the point. i have felt the urge to punch someone in the head. with a brick. if i did i would be a hazard to society. people who dont resist their urges are the problem, not people who have strange urges. sympathize, not excuse.
-
absolutely. i get urges to have sex with girls all the time, but you dont see me pulling attractive girls behind a dumpster at school to get freaky between classes. the need to control ones urges is common to all people, not just people with unusual urges. anyone who gives into them should be viewed as a threat to society, not just pedophiles. what if i had sex with every girl i felt urges toward? i would be a rapist. i dont see the difference between me holding a girl down and a pedophile convincing a prepubescent child that they should have sex. it just so happens that a pedophiles urges should never be acted out, where as mine will probably get satisfied in what is considered a normal healthy relationship with a girl my age. shouldnt we feel sympathy toward someone who just has to live with their urges without hope of eventually acting them out?
-
many pedophiles can control their sex drives also. everyone has a sex drive. everyone has felt just how powerful those urges are. the fact that you feel those urges toward different people doesnt mean you cant compare the feeling in an effort to help understand what another person is experiencing.
-
im curious what any of that has to do with feeling sympathy for someone in a very difficult situation.
-
bettina, why shouldnt we feel sympathy for them? its not like they choose to be attracted to children because they want to emotionally scar them... shouldnt you feel sympathy for someone who feels extremely powerful urges, that wont go away, to do something that has severe consequences if they EVER give in to the urges? im not saying its ok, but shouldnt you feel for a person in that situation?
-
of course i can see the difference. in my mind the difference is that one of them is a disgusting perversion and the other is normal, healthy, human interaction. thats not the point. the idea is to try to see the situation from THEIR point of view, not your own.
-
-
someone is going to lock you up if you have sex? everyone is going to think your a pervert who is a danger to society and shouldnt be allowed around other people? what would happen to a pedophile with that philosophy?
-
bananas
-
how about this. what if you having any sexual activity with a boy your age was extremely frowned upon, even illegal? what if it was considered so unacceptable you would be thrown in jail for doing it and at the very least, probably locked up in an institution if you were a repeat offender?
-
yes, but everything i have heard and experienced says that pneumatic spud guns leave them in the dust. this site provides some info: http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211.fall2000.web.projects/J.%20Jones%20and%20T.%20Kenny/Propellants.htm i certainly wouldnt call it reliable though : P i would also like to note that the site suggests PVC for pneumatic spud guns because its pressure rated while ABS is more impact resistant. while this may be true it is still highly recommended that you use ABS because the other side of ABS being more impact resistant is -thats because its soft! this also means that when your spud gun pops, if its made of PVC it explodes like a grenade. if its ABS it rips like a paper bag.-