Temporocitor

Assuming one is married and has kids, do the parents solver all the problems of their children or do they let them solve them on their own for the most part? As for me I'm hopelessly in debt to Jesus the Christ. As for astrophysics, we only have to apply Classic physics to the discoveries we see in prototplyds (ProtoPlanetaryDisks) to know that the planets contract and start life long before the star ignites. The power of God is as powerful as the predator primus would be. If His power is based upon the vacuum fluctuation, He is infinitely powerful. If His power is based upon the finite matter in all existence, then His power is limited by that quantity of mass. It doesn't matter. He's still unfathomablt more "everything" than we are.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/03/070305-cave-river.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hundreds-of-methane-plumes-discovered-941456.html http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/featured/underground-lakes-river/2190 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070227-ocean-asia.html These are all relevant to the subject of the caldera and underground water sources that could affect it.

A Flux Compression Event (FCE) is an event, artificial or natural, resulting from the sudden release of a contained burst of electromagnetically charged particles. In the sun these would be generated as very strong burst of plasma from within that expand from the core, then arrive at the chromosphere both fast enough and massive enough to be unable to escape through the surface's pores prior to being compressed. When they leave, they would be compressed, like a charge across a capacitor and, in our case, we would be bombarded with a wave of dense magnetic particles and protons. This effect can be artificially generated by releasing a large charge into a coil that is constrained to a specific volume less than the total field area the released charge would need. The result is similar to that above.

Yellowstone is much warmer. It is part of the planet (Globe). Europe is in a deep freeze. Simply because one area, even 2 areas are warming or cooling does not prover change of the whole. Those 2 area may change, even changing the outer layers, but the inner layers may compensate and cannot be measured.

What is fascinating is where we allow Lamda's volume definition to use a similar analogy to the elipse mentioned earlier. such that V =(2(PI)^2 R) ((PI) ab) where R<1 and V <= 1 As R approaches 0 V must approach 1 for Lamda to <= 1 but <> 0 otherwise if R = 0 and Lamda = -(1/2)V

Certainly not. An ET would be working with technology that observed through methods we have yet to achieve. Imagine an approached singularity within each and every atom in existence. If one could tunnel in and read so much as the internal capture of an atom say in a coat of paint, he could translate it all to a human readable deveice, i.e. a screen. If ET's can get here to begin with, they likely could see us through hyperspace/hypospace long prior to wasting energy to get here.

It means we have to examine the meaning of infinity and infinitesimality. Let's imagine that the entire universe was one megagargantualithic black hole. The hole itself would be finite in it's mass, but at the singularity it would represent infinity approaching zero. Everything outside the biggest baddest black hole would represent infinity manifest.

... we must first understand exactly what hyperspace is, where it resides relative to matter space and how it functions within the universe. I'm of the opinion that we will only be locked within the confines of chronology protection if we lock ourselves to only understanding material space. Hyperspace generally refers to Kaluza-Klein's 80 year old concept that there is a dimension of existence that takes up the values between "photonic speed matter" thus it involves faster moving particles. What if it is also complimented by a "hypospace" where all moves slower; the tachyon only combining to form the present through sympathetically interfacing with the tardyon?

The question was posed to me on a survival board regarding whether the Earth's crust would provide sufficient shielding from a solar flare massive enough to generate a Flux Compression Event (FCE). I answered blatantly "No." I asked the simple question that if our own magnetic field about 1/50th that of Jupiter and about 1/500th that of the sun and we can read that non-compressed field at the surface, what makes anyone think the crust will shield them (in a bunker) from a compressed burst 500 times as strong. The quantities are off the top of my head, so I won't feel offended if someone presents the actual figures. The point will still be the same. A compression event is a bit different from a normal CME (Coronal Mass Ejection) or solar flare. It is generated from a deeper internal event as opposed to the surface level prominance. There's a new technology being developed at Harvard called Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. They've had some success at modifying brain processes through mild, frequency modulated magnetic fields, so we know, same as for migraine sufferers, the sun's activity can affect our brains. I'm asking for opinons as to what extreme a massive burst could cause harm. This doesn't need to be limited to natural FCE's, but artificial events qualify for the discussion as well.

This is to gain just that. Some of my research dives into history include Yellowstone's history. Since it's discovery somewhat after the maunder minimum or "little ice age," the caldera had been seen to have geisers. I'm of the opinion that it is not impossible for those leaks to be the earliest stages of fracture, thus eruption. We know very little about supervolcanoes, but if it has an area about 1500 times that of Mt. Saint Helens, the lava dome is more -plate-like so prone toward further fracturing in the caqse of more cold, meaning deep freeze, events. It would seem logical that if the area is already hotter than it used to be, thus expanded a bit, and known for having a meaningful water table, what would happen to this plate, likely weakened around 1650, if it were subjected to some short season of glaciation, may follow classic physics more than quantum I cannot say it has no links to the planet's magnetic inclination, still I cannot either say that it does. Are any of you familiar with any residual magnetic field studies done in the Yellowstone Caldera, similar to Steen's Mountain? Is it in any way a record of geomagnetic field distribution? IMO... the localized glaciation of the Rocky Mountains, basically on the same tome as Western Europe, perhaps some oscillation in that, should Yellowstone become subject to another maunder minimum, only localized, it is possible the caldera's plate could fracture more and sprout new geisers. Any thoughts to fail this? If that is possible, could this runaway? If so, and it broke up into constant steam vents, the aquifers from surrounding states could likely be drained into this supersaturation event process as we know the geisers to be. My last look at the aquifers from Wyoming and surrounding states, suggests the caldera would act as one large hot spring. This would progressively fill in the basins in those areas if the steam continued to bubble, overspilling the water out eventually to the east. Maybe some of you who work with the USGS regurlarly could recommend some sites that I can look up water tables and aquifers online. I first began the study by ordering the maps through the public library here. As I said they all appear to be interleaved quite a bit. I want to see if there is any interleave with that underground river in Mexico, can't recall the name right off the top of my head. I'll post it later.

Fire up your interocitors (Obsolete now) the Temporocitor is in. Just when you thought it was safe...