Graviphoton

I've already compilated a test in which shows the math isn't beyond mans ability. In short, i created my own religious-like text, and applied an English Gematria. The result showed that it can be done. I will post the reults here, when i find my papers. Actually, this is the first intelligent reply. One of my theories was that there was a melodic pattern, which would leave a residue throughout the evolving languages.... such as the results of Einglish Bible Codes. Your Dad The Dead Sea Scrolls where hidden in caves, containing the oldest known pages of the Hebrew religion. That's all it is.

Ecoli Take my word for it. The Dead Sea Scrolls did not use 616. And even if it had, it was assume by scholars to be a mistake. The Bible actually contains quite a few numerical mistakes i bet you don't know about.

Actually, 616 is found to be a mistake. See. I did my homework. Do you? And i don't believe 616 was ever in the Dead Sea Scrolls, so yeh, it doesn't matter at all.

You attack religion if you so desire. My post is not about religion. The respone i have to say, is... incredible. Many are attacking without understanding into the Bible structural context. Others are attacking out of ignorance to the finds... which are themselves evident. You are attacking by waving your arms. Pathetic. ''Prophecy'' was a word i used. The Bible is like an entire book of prophecy. If it pleases you, mythology?

Your Dad -- the entire thing... Then i would like to see some of these interprteations that do not entice to entice reader to calculate, work out, solve the riddle of the name, which is 666.Did you know the answer lay in the fact 666 appears four times in the Bible, and in their use of context? It applied to the first seven words of the Bible, and a shift connection to John 1:1. There

No i No can't just cut and post. My work is hand done. Ecoli's point has holes in it. There are many codes in the Bible. This has never been denied by the scholars who admit them, or the scholars who would rather ignore them if they could. The essential goal they tend to achive is a code that is statistically powerful enough to represent divine intervention. What's that last part supposed to mean? I found out that the numbers raised in the OP where unique, and can only be attainable a few ways. The way shown was the most efficient. Giving the whole thing an aura of importance. The ignorance blinds so many round here. Oh the whole thing. Simply because the other two statements where --- illogical. But i will address them if it makes you feel happier.

Now that's just absurd. I mean, there is greatly more chance a cabalist had integrated patterns into a divine prophecy other than US tax dollars. Please use your nuggins. I am sure you are a smart boy.

No. What is it i missed? Ecoli I am saying it does, for very good reasons. Not pure or mere speculation.

calculate... show ... give... its all the same. The mystery of numbers and the word is evident. I will show you how i statisticated another day when i aint so buisy. Anf how is the above a faulty premise? Is there any indication there should be an intentional pattern in the US tax dollars i am not aware of? This thread is nothing but an attempt to show intentional design sweety. Calling it numerology isn't anymore against the truth than i showed. But then again, numerology was the core of the Bible. We know this.

But the US tax law has no evidence to suggest there should be something intentional. We are dealing with a highly mystical book, which for all suggestions, points to some hidden subtext code. Even the passage in Revelation 13:18 suggests the writers used codes... telling us to calulculate a name. This is gematria being hinted at. And i did show statistical data. I showed my results, and they are not biased one bit. And i never ignored yourdads point. If you read what i said properly, something you have failed to do three times now, you would see i appointed to his suggestion.

I did show them in the OP. I showed that Vernons staple proof was that that the literature was ''almost'' identical, and that the value of John 1:1 displayed an eerily similar ''palandromic multiplicational value'' of 39 x 93, as is found in Genesis 1:1 for 37 x 73. It can also be used in geometry, while 2701 is a triangular number, John 1:1 can be applied as a plinth. There is a whole plethora of codes, again, see Vernons website. And again... DUH... I gave statistical readings at the end. Are people intentionally winding me up here? No, i am stating that the words were intentionally chosen for numerical purposes.

But i did explain this, therefore, i accept your apology. This thread is hee to debunk the claims of diety+codex formulae. I believe in God, but i must remain scientific at all cost.

Ecoli... i am not here to give mathematical lessons. I was here to show my results. And as soon as you said ''And, even if it is proof of intentional design, how is it proof of the design of a deity?'' Why do you assume the last part? I strictly made a point of people to stay away from such claims. This work is to be divinitive proof that such claims cannot be used. I am getting the impression you are not readin my post correctly.

Try when it says... ''This alone, is it proof of an intentional design and placement of theomatics? Well, wouldn't statistics prove this? I statisticated this small work at: 1 in 1.9 x 10^24 or more precisely 1 in a massive 1,968,212,810,225,485,111,967,227.'' Are you even reading the post? The whole thing i mean?

Ecoli Did you see my statistics i applied. I happily justify it, because of the findings. Have you still not bothered to find Dr. Vernons work? You will find John 1;1 and Gen 1;1 are mathematically unque. My extraordinary claim, isn't all that extraordinary. It simply states some intention. I have given mathematical proof and statistics. What else is really required? Its better than spouting off some claim without having nothing to back it up. There is no other interpretation. Take this from someone who has studied theology for a long while. Why do you keep insideously investing that there is some alternative scripture with the first seven words? [[ecoli]] In other words, you asked for statistical evidence. I gave it in the OP. It seems you did not read properly.

Ecoli, i will arrive to you soon. The first seven words of the old testament, or the Torah, is what i have been working with. The value of 39, which i tagged as a ''shift value'' is actually an important value from the findings of the Greek gematria found in John 1:1. I've not seen the movie, but 23 is rememdial next to the values of 777, 70707 and 70777707. Especially the plethora of 373737, 737373, or 393939, or even 939393. You would see the importance, if you where less ignorant of the value of statistical math. Oh, and i did show some proof. I gave a statistical readingof the numbers. The pattern of codex is also proof alone of a design. Now you prove i am wrong. Forgive me, but the math you showed, or numerology as it might be best seen as, hardly scopes to the work i presented now does it? I do ask people be serious atleast. I gave the Greek, not only as an example, but because i used a shift value of 39, which was a key element in John 1:1, a Greek papyrus. Now, i never said seeing the scrolls enhanced anything. It's just that one poster here thought that if i haven't seen them, it played a major role in determining my work. I simply corrected him.

Absolutely sure, i've even seen the scrolls with my own two eyes. The dead sea scrolls are the most accurate and oldest record we have of the Bible as a whole. And, any other confugred papyrus, still have in Hebrew the same words and configuration saying ''in the beginning God created the Heaven(s) and the Earth.'' Do you really believe there is some other interpretation we do't know about? [[What about your example from John? Are you now backpeddling and saying the "code" is only in the first 7 words?]] No not at all. In fact, i told the reader to read up on Dr. Jenkins findings of John 1:1. It shows a harmony of mathematics and even literature. The evidence was so strong, and now even stronger under the math i have presented. ... I haven't shown the numbers are unique? What OP were you reading mmmm? Mathematically show me they are not, and i will concede. Ecoli No, the Greek was just an example. I used Hebrew calculus. For instance, when working with thew Hebrew text, if we applied the Greek math to it, it wouldn't work, and vice versa.

Correct. There is no differing manuscripts, because the dead sea scrolls are the oldest known records of the Bible. The first seven words, in their particular order, are anyhow the same found in any manuscript, so your arguement fails. It was well-known, that many manuscripts written back in those times, did have about them, subsurface codes. The very fact that 15% of the Bible is configured from numbers themselves hints at the codical structure. Don't patronize me. There is evidence. Its clear that 777, 70707 and 70777707 are all interelated. Not some stupid dual digit number that can be integrated into eveyday life. These numbers i have shown are unique. Well, it begs that if this is true, then man, when writing the Bible, carefully created and manipulated the text, so that this would happen. What of it? I'm not sure, only that if any other code is found in the Bible, and the author of the find claims it is of Divine Inspiration, i suggest they be overthrown.

No other copy exists, other than the ancient Hebrew that used seven words. Now, if there is a code, then wouldn't we expect to find it? Why should any code exist? Simply because odes at the time was very popular. But to say, ''i'm gonna find inetntional patterns where none exist,'' is a possible outcome, other than what we can weighy evidently. For instance, notice the code of 7? The three nouns, God, Heaven and Earth calculated to 777. The entire verse when shifted with the simple number of 7, released a cascade of 70707 (intentional?) and even a larger 70777707! This seems to me, very unlikely not to be accidental.

When someone says ''Bible Code,'' many of us think of that ghastly television 4 program featuring the work of Dr. Eliyahu Rips and publisher Micheal Drosnin. Their work was highly flawed, and unlike my math, and findings, theirs acted very randomly, searching for possible connections. Instead, the work i will show you indicates intentional design, without randomly searching for Equi-Distant Letter Counting Codes. Also keep in mind, i make no detail that it be of Divine inspiration within the text, or claims it needed to be of Divine intervention. Instead, i claim these codes are proof of intentional design, and none other. Whilst certain patterns emerged from simple deduction of logic, there was certain times i had to integrate what i called ''shift values.'' The shift values did have about them, numerical importance, and also played the next generation in the math configuration of impressive numbers. Now to the original work i composed: A Dr. Vernon Jenkins found the following facts… before we continue, we must have a look at the Greek Mathematics gematria, and the Chaldean numerical values are: Alpha = 1 Beta = 2 Gamma = 3 Delta = 4 Epsilon = 6 Digamma = 7 Zeta = 8 Theta = 9 Iota = 10 Kappa = 20 Lambda = 30 Mu = 40 Nu = 50 Xi = 60 Omicron = 70 Pi = 80 Koppa = 90 Rho = 100 Sigma = 200 Tau = 300 Upsilon = 400 Phi = 500 Chi = 600 Psi = 700 Omega = 800 The idea that the ancient pages of the Kabala, is that it holds a hidden subtext of codes in numbers. This is not a myth, it is actually very much true. Do not mistake these for the rather poor BBC 4 programmed a yonder of years back, whereas Dr. Eliyahu Rips claimed he had discovered empirical evidence of Bible code phenomena. He used a high-powered computer to [randomly] search for crossword like paragraphs speaking about events that had already happened, and events still to come to pass. I wasn't moved by his finds. I found his contribution actually a bit shaming for the Bible mathematical community. However, he is a fantastic mathematician, well-renown actually, and he statistically put one of his codes down as 60,000 to 1. But mathematicians came forward and found him to be incorrect, with a real statistical analysis of only 1 n 2. However, this should not deter the reader, as codes really do exist within the Bible, as i am going to show you. Dr. Ivan Nikolayevich Panin, a scholar and famous agnostic, born in Russia found a most compelling and spine chilling set of codes... actually, hundreds of them. They where so intricate, the only explanation was intentional design... but why? It turns out that the codes where so complex, called 'the seven phenomena', no scholar or mathematician could really answer why anyone would go to such a lengthly way. The statistics of his finds go into the quadrillions to 1! [You can find his work on the internet - there are plenty of threads]. Another Dr. i wish to speak about today, and before moving onto my own personal find, is a Dr. Vernon Jenkins - he too has his own web page. He simply took the next step and applied geometric patterns into the text, and came up with some extraordinary results. He was able to obtain his calculations from an ancient Hebrew and Chaldean discipline called, 'Theomatics.' By applying each letter of the Hebrew (and) Greek alphabet with their own gematria values, he was able to devise ''whole'' answers. It turns out that these values also held quite a lot in store. The most interesting find of his, was found in Genesis 1:1. He obtained the following values from using this system: 296-407-395-401-86-203-913. He found the following facts (I’m mentioning just an iota of what he found) > the entire system came to a value of 2701. The entire system is also 37 x 73 (reflective symmetry) The numbers 37 and 73 are the 12th and 21st primes (reflective system) The number 2701 is the 703rd triangular number (similarities, almost an anagram) - 703 is also the calculation of 'and the earth' leaving a value of 666 + 666 + 666 This is just a pinch of what he found - you should really go to his site His second work investigated the first paragraph of John 1:1, which is almost symmetrical in literature. He also found some rather remarkable mathematical results the word, ''Word'' came to a value of 373... This mirrors the 37 and 73 phenomena the entire passage valued 3627... Which is 39 x 93 (reflective symmetry) In fact, the entire thing could be used as a plinth to support the triangular basis of 2701 All coincidence? Perhaps, but he recently put statistical averages to this and found it was highly unlikely Now, what stood out for me, was that seven was predominant in the first sentence. There are accordingly 7 words. There are 28 letters (Hebrew letters) which is of course 7 x 4. This was indicating something, i thought. You just need to look at the entire Bible to understand that 7 was the holy number... God rested on the 7th day. Jesus was the 77th generation from Abraham. The 7 churches. The 7 Angels. The 7 plagues. The 7 spirits. The 7 woes... Ect. As it turned out, the three nouns 'God', 'Heaven' and 'Earth' added to 777... A triplet... remember this. So, i decided to investigate the gematria. What ''popped'' out at me, was the numbers 37, 7 and 39. The difference between the number 7 however, is that it was encoded in a differential fasion to both the findings of the 37 and 39 phenomena. So, i treated it differently by doing the following sums... 37 x 7 = 259 39 x 7 = 273 what of these numbers - your probably wondering? Well, if you multiply the two together, they obtain a very similar picture to adding the three nouns together, giving an answer of 70707! But this was only the edge of the blade. It turns out that the joining of 37x7 multiplications with 39x7 multiplications unraveled a host of continuous calculations, that 'may' go into infinity... though, I could be wrong… Here are the extra calculations I found… But first, I call numbers which have a pattern of (let’s hypothetically say),70707 as ‘’Island Effects’’, and are calculations that are very rare. In short, I will call the Island Effect simply (IE). 37 x 273 = 10101 Palindrome/IE 39 x 259 = 10101 Palindrome/IE 37 x 7 = 259 x 39 x 39 = 393939 37 x 7 = 259 x 93 x 93 = 939393 39 x 7 = 273 x 37 x 37 = 373737 39 x 7 = 273 x 73 x 73 = 737373 So, let us continue… with a shift value of 13 and 7007 and 77. 77 x 37 x 13 = 37037 77 x 73 x 13 = 73073 77 x 39 x 13 = 39039 77 x 93 x 13 = 93093 77 x 7 x 13 = 7007 7007 x 39 = 273273 7007 x 37 = 259259 Now consider the following mathematics… 2701 + 1072 (mirrored symmetry)= 3773… 3773 is also an anagram of 37 x 73 totaling the value of 2701… (This was Dr. Vernon’s discovery)… but I found a special harmony, crystallizing a supersymmetry and palindrome > totally indicating seven phenomena… 3773(37 x 13 x 39)= 70777707 This alone, is it proof of an intentional design and placement of theomatics? Well, wouldn't statistics prove this? I statisticated this small work at: 1 in 1.9 x 10^24 or more precisely 1 in a massive 1,968,212,810,225,485,111,967,227 Not bad for as a conclusion from only 7 words and a finite amount of possibilities. But for such an elaborate design to appear from a few simple in-puts begs the question to an intentional design in the Bible. How many more intentional designs are there? I also confirm that this work is a ground-base evidence for Dr. jenkins work of the first seven Hebrew words, and highlighting the link with John 1:1.

experimentation... hum... ... Is it enough i ask, that we observe three dimensions and sense a forth, which is independant from the external world? The answer is of course ''yes''. Therefore, the proof is in the observer. Every one of us experience a three-dimensional bubble of existence and including a pyschological arrow of time, then the equations describing the external world of (3+1) dimensions can be described to map the mind. Then -- there is the proof. The use of it? There may be no use at all, or perhaps the notion of mind-vector equations would be very useful. This is the way it always is in physics.

Its refreshing to see the math displayed correctly. Thank you. Tankers I would suggest you might want to get information or help from someone who knows about how to correctly predict the energies of cosmic collisions. I am certainly not one of them

Quantum physics job, is to provide answers to every system that requires an answer. One of these systems which many physicist has put sweat, blood and tears into, is to resolve the paradox of the mind. There is not a definate mathematical model of consciousness, or the network of the mind, simply because we are unsure to how to procede into such a system with mathematics. PhD, Goswami, Tipler, Penrose, Wolf among others have all studied the world of psychophysics, provided the paranormal mind with a platform created by the new physics. One thing i want to do before i die, is create a mathematical model of the mind which agrees well with experience and quantum physics. One thing that i am tending to do, is provide an understanding of this bubble of perception with hard physical laws. I ask, ''Somehow, space and time is recreated in the dimension (or bubble) of perception. This imaginary dimension then can be applied to the same kind of mathematics we ascribe to space and time external of the mind.'' It is possible that consciousness is in fact under perfect conditions to be integrated against a mathematical model from the legendary Pythagorean theorem, a^2+b^2=c^2 and in any standard course of geometry, you solve it for c, so that c^2√a^2+b^2. Of course, this equation led the way for vector calculus, and describing space as such a vector with three dimensional coordinates. The human beings mind is an extraordinary instrument. It can quite literally ‘’recreate’’ a three-dimensional world, but somehow, doesn’t exist in it. In fact, no matter how much we deny the latter part, it is well known that what we ‘’observe’’ is not of the outside world, but a representation of it. There is not many mathematical models of consciousness existing in physics today because of two reasons. One being that string theory has stolen so much time out of the academic world, and two that its not really known how. How do you make a mathematical model of consciousness? One start, is by describing the ‘’recreated’’ three dimensional phenomenon with similar vector calculus used to describe space. When we do, we can even treat both types of vectors are as totally separate systems… why? Because the mind doesn’t exist in any unique time or external space. What we see, or sense, is purely imaginal. ||V||=√x+y+z, For a normal three-dimensional space vector calculation, but I am wanting to describe space as well as something ‘’separate’’ to the external dimensions of the human mind, so it would be best to associate imaginary values as well real. i=x+y+z And under normal calculative vector products, we can state that the coordinates be described as a row vector with increasing values (a_1, a_2…) ||V|| =i√a_1+a_2+a_3 Giving each increasing value with an imaginary product. But as we introduce a four-vector condition, with one time dimension also acting as an imaginary space dimension, it’s already unique with the human perception, because already, time is an imaginary product of relativity. In other words, time is an imaginary dimension, so we aren’t really going to need to change any condition of the time dimension as seen from a Minkowski spacetime. Some scientists have gone as far as to claim that perhaps time and mind are two different sides of the same coin, so by making a spacetime model for the mind, under the impression it is ‘’separate’’ from the external world, may not be entirely correct or truthful. But can instead become an excellent tool in bringing consciousness and spacetime together. η = (0,0,0,1) is the row vector describing a four dimensional vector space under a Poincare Group, with one time dimension, and as many of us will have already seen, is put into a Minkowski Matrix: ….1000 ….0100 η =0010 ….000-1 Remember, even though this is used to describe spacetime at large, they are so very similar to how can describe the imaginary vectors of what we come to observe and sense. What is great about doing this, is that we can integrate similar concepts of timelike and spacelike qualities to consciousness, when we undergo some chemical or neural change, so that the operators don’t run normally. What do I mean? Simply that we experience also a spacelike η(v,v,)<0 and timelike η(v,v)>0 condition, so normally, in everyday life [[we usually]] experience the correct flow of time and space (1)… we sense time moving forward without recourse, and we sense our movement in three dimensions through space (2). When does space and time not move accordingly? The answer turns out to be when the mind is not fully aware. When we dream, it is possible that the spacelike conditions and timelike conditions do not operate normally when we are awake (3). Moving on, there are other ways to describe consciousness. We can totally ignore the fact we observe a three-dimensional vector space, and only focus on the one time dimension, and describe ‘’normal’’ spacetime with an extra time dimension uniquely attached to spacetime. In other words, using the normal Poincare Group and adding on the vector we experience I will describe as Tdi, simply, so that a row vector is given as η =(0,0,0,1,Tdi), so that I can state the following: a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + tdi^2 - Tdi^2 With the normal time vector described as tdi. I solved the real part of the equation by allowing i^2 = i *k^2 so that the result is a^2 + b^2 + c^2 - i^2*k^2^2 = 0 a^2 + b^2 +c^2 + k2^2 =0 Solving it normally through algebra, giving a final solution of: a=b=c=k^2=0. There is one last way to integrate this, and that is simply by treating the normal time vector of space as [the] dimension of the mind: a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + tdi^2 So there is no need to add any extra time dimension at all, so we can allow the one time dimension to have two functions, and would fit in nicely with the postulation that time is somehow mind, made by many scientists over the years. I now speculate on the math that links the vectors of spacetime (0,0,0,1) with the vectors we know about through the psyche which I have shown can be described as having its own row vector of (0,0,0,1) or by linking the one time dimension as somehow the same thing… So, we can relate the function of both vector rows into some mathematical notation now, linking the two together. This can be done a number of ways… I would presume. a^2= i^2=(√(a_1^2+a_2^2 + a_3^2 ))^2= √a_1^2+a_2^2 + a_3^2 Where the right hand side refers to an equality with the left. Which can be reduced to: a=|a|= √i – a The mind is a subreality, a subdimension that in this interpretation is inextricably linked to space and time. This is similar to what physicists have been trying to inform the academic world for years, and it has been recently explained that we need some kind of definate model of consciousness, if we are to attempt any grand unified theory.

General Relativity Einstein worked (from) Newton’s equations describing matter and gravity: And he also changed a lot of it too, describing gravity in whole new terms to physicists. Newton’s law of gravitation is given as: F = G M_1M_2/d^2 Where G is the gravitational constant, m1 is mass one, and m2 is the second body with mass, and F was the force distributed between them. Also, Einstein worked with the already existing equation describing the laws between two masses m_1 and m_2, finding a square force that weakened over greater factors: Charles Augustine de Coulomb in 1785 showed that the force of attraction and the force of repulsion between two electrically charged bodies and also between magnetic poles also obey an inverse square law. The force for two magnetic bodies are given as: Fm = (1/µ)(p_1p_2/r^2) With what Einstein had in mind for this universe, which was pure curvature, he was able to use these concepts to create a geometrical vision of our cosmos. It described that matter was actually an energy: E=Mc^2 Which converts to the negative of E=Mc^2 E=-Mc^2+(E=Mc^2) = 1022KeV of gamma energy Through: M=E/c^2 Which is the reverse of E=Mc^2 and was first developed by Poncair. This scientist was also known for his remarkable work on relativity, and is often forgotten. In fact, General Relativity unifies the work of Poncair and Einstein in their theories describing Special Relativity with Newton’s law of Gravitation. Matter warped space, and time told matter how to move. And it can be said that time warped matter, and that matter told space how to act. This is because of Einstein’s equivalence principle, which covers a massive scope in his mathematically-genius work. This next equation is Einstein’s field tensor, and you will most certainly learn it in a standard course of physics at college or university: G_ab=kT_ab This equation is very important, where the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime. As we have seen, Einstein used Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of: Where π is pi, and G is the gravitational constant and k is a coupling constant, which will be most familiar as k=8 π G/c4 The following equation which is an extension of the above equation connects matter with energy with the geometry of spacetime (on the left): Guv(-8 π G/c2)T^µv But using the more well-known value of kappa, it gives the more recognized value of the above equation: Guv= (8 π G/c4)T^µv A major consequence of General Relativity, is that it describes that time is dilated round strong gravitational fields. Tim can also be warped traveling through spacetime at very high speeds in long distances. We will explore that soon. t’=t√1-2GMc^2r Where, • t' = Time inside the gravitational field. • t = Time outside the gravitational field. • M= The mass causing the gravitational field. • r = The distance from the center of the gravitational field. • c = the speed of light in a vacuum 186,000 mps. • G = The gravitational constant = 6.6742 x10^-11 N m^2 kg-2 From Pound and Rebka’s experiment in 1959 at the Harvard University, we know that the shift round in the gravitational distortions warp time only by infinitesimal standards. In order to measure the dilation with significant results, we have resorted to using atomic clocks. In other words, the life spans of particles could be experienced to be longer moving at very very high speeds. We can such particles, such as gold atoms to a fraction short of ‘c’, but we can never exceed that v>c because then we would require an infinite amount of energy… which is another successful prediction of relativity. General Relativity was by far the more difficult to create, as it took Einstein so many more years to finish it. Special Relativity was also mathematically beautiful and so very straight forward when one began to appreciate it. Special Relativity 1. Special Relativity and Flat Spacetime involve deep understanding into the spacetime interval — the metric — spacetime diagrams — vectors — the tangent space — dual vectors — tensors — tensor products — the Levi-Civita tensor —electromagnetism — Lorentz transformations — differential forms — worldlines — proper time — energy-momentum vector — energy momentum tensor — perfect fluids — energy-momentum conservation index manipulation, and more. In these relativistic principles, we need to know some concepts. Minkowski’s flat vector spacetime is best used in physics today. It is given as (-, -, -, +) or (+,+,+,-) and with a matrix of, and in special conditions, can be written as (0,0,0,0) in zero-dimensions: …..1000 …..0100 N=0010 …..0001- The following equations are called ‘’Cartesian’’ coordinated systems, and they describe the distance between two points: s2 = (∆x)^2 + (∆y)^2 In a rotated system, we twist coordinates around in space, and we find them as a geometry of distance. The new coordinates are given as: s2 = (∆x′)^2 + (∆y′)^2 Being almost identical math, they are easy to remember. In this case, we say that distance is an invariant of these equations. More interesting is that we learn that time is also an invariant of space. Because of this, we can therefore find the following equation describing a spacetime interval: s^2 = −(c∆t)^2 + (∆x)^2 + (∆y)^2 + (∆z)^2 Where (t, x, y and z) are the coordinates of spacetime, because we can rotate space, and find a corresponding value with time, and this is why we say that space and time are one thing. All these equations lead to many more equations, just as Lorentz Boosts which derive from the mathematics described by Galileo, and his coordinates are given through the variables: x' = x − vt y' = y z' = z t' = t We therefore give the spacetime metric a 4x4 matrix. Time coordinates are found as being invariant to the system. We then have the formula, s^2 =η_μ_v∆x^u∆x^v We can simplify the transformation in spacetime into a more arbitrary equation, x^u → x^u ’ = x^u + a^u Where aμ is a set of four fixed numbers. Translations leave the differences ∆xμ unchanged, so it is not remarkable that the interval is unchanged. The only other kind of linear transformation is to multiply xμ by a (spacetime-independent) matrix: x_μv’ = η^u_v x^v We should now start with rotational boosts, such as found in an x and y plain. We are always taught that the rotational value θ is in fact a periodic invariant with a period with a value corresponding to 2π. Now, the Boosts are in fact nothing but rotations in time and space. It can be put into a matrix, but i very much doubt my variables would show up here, so i shall continue just explaining. The Boost parameter φ (found in the matrix), is in fact defined to infinity -00 to 00, totally in this direction. The rotation angles need not abide by such a rule, if my memory serves me correctly. t′ = t cosh φ − x sinh φ x′ = −t sinh φ + x cosh φ . Here we have a set of Boosts, where the transformed coordinated are t' and x', and this transformation has a moving value of x'. And therego, we say such a Boost has a velocity of v = x/t= sinh ang/cosh ang = tanh ang To cut them down we can replace φ = tanh−1 v to obtain, t′ = ang (t − vx) x′ = ang (x − vt) Where gamma = 1/√1 − v2. This satisfies the expressions for Lorentz transformations. Applying these formulae leads to time dilation, length contraction, ect. In Lorentzian spacetime, their components are unbalanced. ω_μ = (−ω_0,ω_1,ω_2,ω_3) But, even in a more complicated form, a curved spacetime, seems to solve the problems. Before relativity, we never considered time as a vector of space. Now we cannot remove either, as it has been shown that time is a distance as well in space. To move through space, is to take a massive journey in time for us. In fact, time moves at the speed of light, and because we live in such a slow part of the universe, we cannot help but flow along with it. Relativity was also developed to answer for optical phenomenon. One of these the Length Contraction of a physical body accelerating through spacetime. The Length Contraction formula is given as: L=L_0 (1-v^2/c^2) 1/2 Here, L0 is the proper length, and v is for velocity and c is for the speed of light. This equation shows that an object moving through spacetime is found to contract in length to the observer. Such paradoxes like, the pole and barn paradox are prime examples of this optical phenomenon. So in short notation, we say that space contracts and time dilates by a factor of: √(1-v^2/c^2) As I explained, one example of Length Contraction is given by the pole-barn paradox. This is where a pole is traveling through space, and is physically contracted. If the pole is larger than the barn to begin with, and now it is shorter because of length contraction it can fit in the barn. Paradox is, how can a pole larger than the barn be length contracted so that it fits as it passes by? In this next set of equations, we work with a pole traveling through space which has a proper length of 20 meters. An observer moving at a speed v = 0.98 c will experience a contraction as shown: L_0 = 20 m L = L_0 (1 - v^2/c^2)1/2 = 20 [ 1 - (0.98)^2 ]1/2 = 3.98 m If an object is accelerating through spacetime, it will experience a time warp. This is also been known to be called time dilation. If we experience time warps, then according to relativity this must also mean space warps. We don’t experience space warps so much because we move so fast through time. In fact, we spend more time in the time dimension than we do in space. The time dilation formula is given as: ∆t=∆t_0/(1-v^2/c^2) 1/2 In Einstein’s paradox, a moving spacetime traveler (twin one) is going at speeds short of ‘c’ arrives home having only aged a year or so, and on Earth his twin has aged considerably. In relativity, we learn that E=Mc^2, and that energy can be transferred through angular momentum of a system, and the conservation of physics states that the loss of energy is equal to the gain of energy given as: ∆E=∆Mc^2 Where mass gained is a loss in energy. And we also find that energy gained or lost, is equivalent to a gain in mass: ∆M=∆E/c^2 Where L is the angular momentum, r is the position of the particle, x is the cross product and p is the linear momentum: P=Mv This shows, as it does in any text book, that momentum p is related to mass multiplied by the velocity v. The importance of this equation is that energy can only ever be transferred through angular momentum. So the particle is said to be given as: L=r x p And between two objects, one finds that one gains momentum and the other looses momentum, given as: ∆p_1=-∆p_2 Because everything is conserved, the state of momenta found prior to the transfer is equal to the momenta afterwards: m_1u_1+m_2u_2=m_1v_1+m_2v_2 These equations are beautiful. I have also equated that if an end is desired by time and the cosmos, then somehow mass and energy is an illusion: E=Mc^2+E And if ‘’c’’ is not equal to zero, which we know it isn’t, then we find through algebra that: Mc^2=0 This can be found to be true about this universe. All matter comes to zero when added with the energy in the vacuum: (E=Mc^2)+(E=-Mc^2) = 0 So the converse can be accumulated: M=E/c^2+M Then all energy comes to zero as well: E/c^2=0 The reason why this happens, is because we are adding all the matter and energy, about 1080 particles ‘’pop’’ into existence, and when added to the negative energy of the vacuum produces a zero-total. The negative reservoir is called The Dirac Sea, and it is filled with negative spinning particles. In fact, Dirac postulated this sea using relativity. Virtual particles, like the kind found in this sea, don’t share the same properties as real energy: E^2 = m^2c^4 And is found to reduce to this instead of the normal energy and momentum formula: E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2c^4 … for when a particle is at rest p=0. Where p is momentum and c is the speed of light. This new relativistic outlook on the electron allowed Dirac to formulate his famous equations describing antimatter. These relativistic formulae show that every time an electron ‘’pops’’ into existence, it leaves behind a hole. This hole is found to be its antipartner, the positron. To measure the Kinetic energy of something, you must calculate it with the formula: KE=E-E_0 And to measure the Kinetic energy of a high speed particle, we use the equation: KE=Mc^2 - M_0c^2 And the total energy is found as: E=Mc^2 (1-v^2/c^2) 1/2 And the rest energy is given in relativity as: E_0=Mc^2 Pure simplicity at its best. These equations have been the most influential in the world. These equations can describe the motions of little particles as well. The complications of this are amazing. Time dilation in relativity means that a twin traveling off into the far reaches of spacetime a fraction short of c would return to earth hardly aged a year, whilst his twin is an old man. Einstein has shown the world of physics that time is not a fixed clock in the sky, and two events that are relative to each other will experience different times traveling at different speeds. ‘’Spacetime,’’ brought into one continuum, could be changed into what are called ‘’timelike’’ conditions. To explain what it is, a system in spacelike conditions experience space and time moving in the correct directions along their wordline. But in a timelike condition, spacetime switch roles and space becomes timelike in character. That would mean that you would begin to move through time like you had in space. In spacelike paths, we define the path length given as, ∆s = ∫(√ η μv)(dxμ/dλ x dxν/dλ)(dλ) In timelike conditions, we define the paths in real time, ∆t = ∫(√ - η μv)(dxμ/dλ x dxν/dλ)(dλ) Which will be positive. Usually, paths taken by physical particles seldom change, so we find that in normal situations, massive particles move on timelike paths and null paths. Vectors AND Scalars In relativity, we find vector and scalar equations that describe in their own terms coordinates and fields. For Vectors, we find that they describe: Length, Area, Speed, Volume, Time, Mass, Energy Density, Pressure, Power, Temperature, Electric Charge and the Electric Potential. For scalars, we find: Displacement, Acceleration, Velocities, Force, Weight, Momentum, Torque, Electric Currents, Electric Field Strengths and Magnetic Field Strengths. Even though they are described by different names, they are actually connected sensitively that one could say they are the same thing, because of magnetic and electric curl equations. The electric constant (ε_0) has a value of 8.854*10-12Fm-1, and the magnetic Constant (μ_0) has a value of 4π*10-7Hm-1.

Einstein was heavily influenced by his mathematical insights, and this gave him great understanding into the world of particle behaviour - this too must bring with it the forces that 'carry' these specific particles… This included a particular medium for all matter called the Aether. What is 'Aether Theory' all about? Einstein wrote a paper on what was called, 'The Investigation of the State of Aether in Magnetic Fields'. I find it a most interesting paper. I believe it was originally devised contemporaneously for [one] of his uncles. Also known as 'Ether' from the Greek Word (aio'np), which basically means 'upper' or a.k.a. 'pure fresh air,' - it was believed to be an all-spacetime filling field. They refer its effects as a 'transmissional medium'. The Aether hypothesis has come in numerous forms, through the multiple interpretations throughout history. The orthodox Aether Interpretation is that it is a physical force/medium that permeates every corner of spacetime thus indicating an influence on all materialistic bodies contained within all spacetime. Another result of Aether presents properties that give rise to the electric, magnetic and gravitational potentials, and also determines the propagating velocity of their effects. It get's even more complex: it states that the propagating effects throughout all of the universe, are determined by the physical field of the Aether - which acts in a manor analogous to sound waves, such as the wave properties of a photon. Any developing propagation and potential effects within spacetime due to their velocities are viewed as having real effects. Thus, fundamental interactions depend on this Aether Force, in intrical ways. The rippling or ''propagation'' of the Force of Aether also presents time directionality, reflected in the 'Radiative Arrow’ - found in quantum evolution. Though, the effect in velocities predicted by Aether indicates the possibility in the answering of matter formations, and the age discrepancies that haunt our observations of galactic formations. This is as elementary as i can express it: Aether is a physically-interactive force field which acts as a mediator throughout all universal bodies - even between them in the vast Intergalactic Cosmological Medium - and like all 'mediums', if it exists, as i believe it does, must have fundamental attributes consisting of a pressure, a tension, a mass density and temperature. Aether, as controversial as it has become to be known in the academic world, has played, as i believe, one of the biggest roles in the developing theories of the equally controversial quantum mechanics. And this is why: During the 19th century, the most elementary fundamental forces where known as electrical, magnetical and 'luminous' phenomena. By unifying these fundamental characteristics, brought with it new modes of theories... integrating the fields of force into a single network. The Preferred Model of Aether Theory Thus, the attention during the 19th century was focused on the fundamental interaction of electromagnetic phenomena. It was in fact assumed for a while by the majority of the physicists of that era that 'ponderable' matter, consistent of having what is called 'rest value,' and 'inertia', was inexorably differential, that was 'somehow' meshed, or, enveloped through the permeating, all-space and all-time Aether. Now, some strange conclusions can be made here. If the above is correct, this interpretation states that an object must literally 'plow' through the Aether. If it 'plows' through the Aether, it then must also drag the ''fabric'' of Aether along its trajectory. If the hypothetical object does not move the distribution of pressure exerted by the strange Aether, means that it is equally proportional in all directions! A function coined by scientists as (isotropic). It has also come to be more widely known as the 'Rest Frame of The Aether.' Thought indicated that the measure of matter in motion through this Aether Field was highly important. One way to measure such an effect would be found in the momentum of the Earth, which was considered to be suffice in magnitude, that its speed was determinable. Thus a physicist called Albert Michelson in 1881 set out to find the tail whip of the Aether wind as earth ploughed through it. The Test of Matter in Motion Through The Aether Michelson solved the question to this, through experimental tests, that, unfortunately resulted in 'the Big Goose Egg,' - 'absolute nada'. Again, it was repeated in 1887, this time counterparted with physicist Edward Morley, and their experiment became to be known as the 'Michelson-Morley Experiment.' However, even this revived experiment proved fruitless! It basically meant at the time, that the positive results predicted by the ‘Preferred Model,’ were not conclusive with the predicted results. So How Should Matter in Aether Be Viewed? Well, science informs us that any medium would itself react to any movement of a physical ''meshed'' object, the postulate of a static Aether is also assumed to be flawed. However, ways around this can be evaluated. The 'classic way' to describe the following, is that, whenever you swirl your hand in water, and if the medium has any viscosity, it will experience a 'dragging effect', thus can be now imagined to cause a circular motion - a bit like the way a Black Hole itself drags space and time with it... However, as the time variables increase, so does the relative speed and drag between the body and the medium. This results the overall magnitude to be equally dependant on the 'value of viscosity', which relentlessly leads to many variants of the Aether theory and the momentum of matter through it. These lead to 'Coefficient Theories,' and principles for how all Bradyonic matter should interact with the Luxen particle of light. The progressive evolution in Aether theories has paradoxically made our search rather difficult, as they open 'too many doors', making any initial theory almost invalid to make any self-assured predictions. Quantum Mechanics and Aether Theory Quantum Mechanics, as you will undoubtedly know, is used to interpret the function of matter at the fundamental level. We see this as all arising from the vacuum, like the spontaneous bubbling of electrons and antielectrons out of the Dirac Sea whenever there is enough energy present. Remember, the Dirac Sea is packed full with negative particles. Matter must come out of the vacuum, and create two distinct forms of longer-lived spacetime distortional fluctuations; a particle and its antipartner. This was called by physicist J. A Wheeler as ''quantum foam.'' These fluctuations arise out of a spatial coordinate - this size is 1.616 x 30^-33, which is the smallest known 'box' of space. The fluctuations also arise out of the smallest time possible, called the ‘Planck Time,' which is 5.391 x 10^-44 seconds. It is here, in this infinitesimal unit of space that releases an enormous amount of virtual energy in the quickest time possible! On this small level, space and time literally forces these spontaneous rapid releases of quantum bubbles of energy/gas that breaks into a particle and its antiparticle. Thus, Quantum Theory might itself be indicating an equivalence with 'zero-point energy field,' that may be the shadow of a ''particulate Aether''. There are simply some aspects about the Aether field that we simply ‘just need’. There are many more theories about the Aether though which are very controversial such as The Einstein-Aether Theories… And all this originally stemmed from physicist Thomas Young’s experiment of a photons quantum wave. I don't think the Aether field will be solved any time soon – however, the Aether field is now gaining more and more interest, as I have been informed by a Ph.D… The reason why is because some scientists believe that dark energy might be linked to the Aether… And because we know so very little about dark energy, this has got the scientists very excited.