Flak

Is a little contradictory, at least for me. Both may be affected by gravity.

With the current technology we can take like 100000000 of years to put a sonde there.

I had check the book at the library today, hmm, not much time with it but I didnt found the definition I told before.

I´m not really sure however, thats is the book I should got such info. If not I have no idea from where I got it. I asked a friend about before post and he confirm me that it would be there such theory.

Yep, on that moment there was "exceptics" wich say that for a form of life inside or outside of a craft is not posible to do that. Einstein used the most fast speed available in the universe wich manifestate itself. You cannot use higher values of speed on the formula listed above, so that formula says that highert velocities of speedlight are not posible and that formula also said that the photon cant have mass. My point is that there is posible higher velocities, and by this the photon can have mass.

I had remembered it, the book is called "A Brief History of Time, from Big Bang to Black Holes" from Stephen Hawking. Since your are from Mexico you will find it under the name of "Historia del Tiempo, del Big Bang a los Agujeros Negros" However there is a little detail, when searching for the book I found my thesis that I did when bring the theory to practice by my "experiment theory" explained above. So for sure in the book, the author talks about the "in order to create the black hole is needed an infinite cylinder" and a lot better explained. So my part is not sustained. Sorry if I confuse you.

I also had learned at a college. All of us was for sure.

Nevermind.

Yes you right , finally someone say it right. It is little technologicaly aswell because we dont have clue, even to reach that speed.

There is life there? Time ago, on a publication, apeared that 4 years (or 8?) after the explosion of Krakatoa with was the most powerfull of the modern times, an strange explosion apeared on Siberia (or Russia forest). So the author talked about that maybe "someone" at Alpha Centauri solar system got this manifestation tought that was a message and reply it. Well the above is not a must, but the point here is that with the current technology we can travel there?, even if we sent a sonde at 1/4 lightspeed we had to wait 4 years minim (depending on technology and after wait 16 years) to get reports about?

It depends: Based on Relativity with the lightspeed as a limit, pure energy. Based on that lightspeed is not a limit, matter.

Please, why you dont tell us what things are wrong acording to your studies?

Exactly. The sound speed was a barrier to human technology and now it is not more a barrier. Light speed is a barrier aswell now and some day it wont be anymore. About the formula, ed84c, the Relativity is based with the light speed as a limit. Time is not stoped by lightspeed. If on astronomy you check the bright of an star 90 years light of distance this is because the photons took 90 years to reach here.

Because is the clock got affected by the supersonic flight.

Well here is my explanation about. For sure many of you use this formula to tell me that a photon dont have mass, lets check: m = m0 / √(1-(v/c)²) The Relativity is based on that Einstein took the most fast speed that the universe show, the light speed. So if you think the photon dont have mass, why when the light find a massive object, like an star, it got deviated? About if there is something faster than light lets check the following: Let say the blue wave is a light wave and the black line a surface. The light wave move at light speed, velocity a, and collide to the surface at the same speed. The velocity b is called "phase speed" or "phase velocity", that speed is higher than the light speed, so in theory, light speed can beat itself. About a supersonic aircraft, yourdadonapogos you dont hear the aircraft when it pass over you, the sound comes later.

We dont have proof to check is there is something faster than light, since if something is faster than light, it became invisible. As sound speed isnt a barrier, light speed is not a barrier aswell. Show me proof that a photon dont have mass. No one is sure if it have or not.

Exlpain yourself, I know about some theories about, but when aplicated their are wrong. The fact is that a lot of publications, (that I will find the correct source so I can foward you) explain that lightspeed can be doubled, even go 10 times its speed, by the simply concept that is not the limit of speed.

On the general science forum there was a thread about if we can go faster than light speed or not. I wanted to reply posting why it isnt a barrier but the thread was closed. I think no matter if it is like other threads, I come here to talk if not I will spend time on the library in silence. The point is: we can travel faster than light speed?. Yes. Speed/aceleration is acumulative, it depends on mass and energy. The lightspeed is only the barrier of the "showed" speed, faster than that is not noticiable so we dont know what move faster than light.

The lightspeed is not a barrier, you can go over it if you are able to. But for sure cyclons on Jupiter dont go even to lightspeed, maybe he means soundspeed?

Probably , but the fact is that this is not anything tested before. Well maybe in the past electric energy researching was considered a dark and tenebrous part of the science aswell.