Jump to content

Villain

Senior Members
  • Posts

    355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Villain

  1. <br><br><a href="dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith">Working link to faith defintion</a><br><br><br>A form of peer-review would be documentation of findings by different sources.<br><br> <br><br>Science as a body of work, the subject science, all forms of science.<br><br> <br><br>I am saying that this is what leaves room for the Bible as such to be considered evidence. If scientists can trust and accept theories that they have not personally proved or disproved then there is room for religion.<br><br> <br><br>Are you comparing scientists to a jury?
  2. My point being that only someone who understands everything about a theory has the ability to determine its truth, all others rely on faith that it exists. Therefore no scientist can claim that they believe everything about science until they personally test it all. To discredit the Bible as non evidential is to discredit works of science that you personally cannot understand as non evidential even if you think that had you understood them there would be evidence (try remain neutral when reading this).
  3. It's a loaded question, either answer requires the person to act in faith as they don't have an understanding of either. Trusting the person in front of them or trusting the book written by someone is a coin toss.
  4. If a person does not have the ability to understand either religion or science, which one would you teach them as being truth?
  5. Could you give an example of each? I would assume that some theories that are highly regarded now were seen as blind faith at some time (by science itself, to avoid confusion).
  6. Watch the video and substitute Gloria with the word Science .
  7. When looking at science and more importantly the back bone of science, the scientist, one should not be too quick to disregard religion as having no part. For which scientist has proven all scientific knowledge? What I am saying is that faith is something that is not completely exclusive to religion and that the trust in humans of results and theories which have not personally been verified by oneself is very much the same as a faith in religion.
  8. Perhaps he was referring to your action of advising.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.