Mike Infinity

Thanks! For the information and your personal veiws. I am a very keen individual especially in the feild of spirituality. I am a student of the S.O.U.L. (School Of Universal Law) self-educated and inventor of many new and original sciences. As a person you should never need anything external to validate what basic logic can conclude. The data I provided is more than enough to scientificlly prove the 4th spatial dimension, I am smart enough to know that. If you feel that what I have is ordinary and not extraordinary, unoriginal, poorly presented, full of holes, and non-understandable, sorry. To me and to the professors at Dillard University, the ones who put their signature of approval on this concept about 4 years ago and to the other scientific minds from other sites, this is ground breaking and rigorous innovation. So when persons say "i dont see anything special" and "it would be more understandable if..." and "i dont think you should spend anymore time on this" is almost laughable to an above average IQ such as myself. I was in gifted classes since kindergarten so science fairs and regional blue ribbons I am accustomed to. College was too slow for me so I taught myself by reading my friends and family college course books, I took a special liking to philosophy and I reached a plateau of thought which lead to scientific enlightenment. I called it philosophysics. Some of my discoveries and experiments that I will release this year are free energy via my hyperion atom which is a model of an atom that mimics in principle it's function using triangular magnets in the shape of platonic solids and other hierarchies of polyhedra submerged in water as if to polarize the charge of the water. I call it fire-water! Also, if you take these "hyper atoms" and suspend them in a medium of water the magnetic faces of the polyhedra will attract and repel one another and a these units merge to create whatever they will, we can collect the data and see if the hyper atoms form molecules. On top of all this there is still my trism of infinite color, trism acoustics, the sky trism, the Omega Sophia AGHG (antigravity hypergyroscope), the holographic recorder, and much much more! If the Universal Grid dosent woo you, the many that follow will. Even if you cannot understand them, out will be some historical "eye-candy". But for real, isn't the UG beautiful?! I think so!

Next!

Your argument is also inferior.

I guess the Wright brothers gave you all the mathematical aeronautical data to prove that their machine flew... Go figure. I drew the hyper tetrahedron first, from there I used it deduct the graph because there was no 4D graph, it had yet to be visualized. In other words, there was no suitable language to express this polytope. How can you plot a visual 4D shape on a 3-space graph? So I created the graph just for the hyper tetrahedron. But it works on all non-euclidean geometry! It's philosophically logical, intellectually factual, easy to read and ready to be used. And it is to the maximum extent of my academic proficiency. You are asking me to convert the data to inferior language.

Again, the numbers can only describe what you see here today. For me to get numbers added to it, it's not a problem. If you dont need numbers to explain the first three dimensions, you dont need it for the fourth either. I offer you the Universal Grid fully operational and still you ask me for more? Wow, thats like me showing you an antigravity device that works and you ask me to write you an equation for it, and if I cant then the antigravity effect is not real and useless. Sounds weird if you ask me.

I give you experimental proof of the fourth spatial dimension. Yeah but the visualzation of 4 spatial dimensions are. Do numbers describe real objects or does real objects define numbers? I give you something tangible, your little vector is meaningless to a high school graduate such as myself. Furthermore, numbers arent real, their only concepts and ideas. Thats why I didnt put any on the graph! I can show you atomic bonds with my next experiment, yeah models of atoms that act and react as real atoms do so you can dismantle that oversized hoola hoop. This is the first of many tangible experiments. Like I said... I hope you got space for me on that podium...

As you wish... Check "Relativity Forum" for written and illustrated report

My name is Michael Joseph Crosby I am a 34 year old high school graduate, I reside in New Orleans. I have discovered, and in this short presentation I intend to experimentally prove, the fourth spatial dimension. Read this post or Watch the rap video! The Universal Grid (UG) This retractable multispace graph will visually reveal all Euclidean 4 dimensional polytopes. This is a 2 dimensional representation of four 3D spaces that move and are situated in the same manner as tetrahedral bond angles, 109.28°. In layman's terms, these are four cubes that come together at precise angles to form a 5th cube. So the 4 directions in space are defined by the simplest volume in the universe- the tetrahedron. Take the tetrahedron, find it's center, then draw lines to each of it's four vertices, these are the four directions in space. It is only logical to measure space and lay the foundation for all space by starting with the tetrahedron. The cube is indeed the most practical application of 3D space in the real world (I can't imagine trying to hang pictures in a tetrahedral room), however, the cube has six planes and the tetrahedron has only four, which makes the tetrahedron the simplest aggregation of planes that form a volume in the universe and the "alpha" of space. In the case of the Universal Grid, the tetrahedron and the cube work together by using the cube to represent the real world and the tetrahedron as the governor of the motion and nature of space. 4D Graphing Keep in mind that the human eye views the world in two dimensions; any person familiar with computer graphics knows that you can pull up a preset cube, take the wire frame model of it, change the viewing settings so that the perspective is not affected by space, and from a certain angle the cube is actually a hexagon; that same perspective is true of this graph. Though these hexagons are 120° to one another, an actual model of four connected cubes whose centers are retracted at 109.28° from each other would at a certain angle appear to be situated in the same manner as the hexagons of the UG. ugrealgraph.bmp The 3D cubes are represented in 2D by the colored hexagons. Three axial lines are visible, the fourth is represented by the point of origin of this graph; it moves towards and away from the perspective viewer. The blue hexagon of the UG represents the 3D space that moves along the x axis, the green hexagon moves along the y axis, and the red hexagon along the z axis. The black hexagon in the center is the 3D space that moves along the fourth or w axis which is represented as the point of origin. The graph has two positions: Figure 1: Collapsed - all four 3D spaces fully occupying the same space. Figure 2: Retracted - all four 3D spaces partially occupying the same space. Input the coordinates into the UG while the graph is in the collapsed position. If this were a computer program, the data would actually go into all four 3D spaces as the same coordinates in each; I used a red dry erase marker and drew the same tetrahedron on each graph. When the graphs of the UG are retracted along the 4 axial lines that are situated 109.28° from each other, the 4D phenomenon occurs and the hypervolume is revealed. Lets take a look at the UG in action. Figure 3: The tetrahedron (collapsed) Figure 4: The hypertetrahedron (retracted) You can clearly see 5 tetrahedrons, the one in the center is the 3D being. Also note how the revealed hypertetrahedron fits neatly inside of the created 5th cube that is comprised of portions of the other cubes. The three active cubes of this 2D version of the UG overlap to reveal the multi-colored cube; the created tetrahedron within it is almost the same size in comparison as the original inputted volume is to the collapsed cubes. This allows for the created multi-colored 5th cube of space (the new and improved Hypercube) to serve as it's own graph giving the ensuing polytope a unique set of relative coordinates. Carefully observe and compare this polytope to the description of what a hypertetrahedron should entail. The unvisualized mathematically accepted calculation predicts that this simplex should have 20 faces. This polytope indeed has 20 faces. Findings and Implications I have discovered a phenomenon, any shape, be it 2D, 3D, or 4D that is imputed in to the graph will produce a miniature replica. I wondered if a asymmetrical shape would display a miniature, indeed it did. In chemistry, tetrahedral bond angles are the manner in which many atoms bond to form molecules. The implications suggest that the 4th dimension governs the foundation of atomic and molecular bonds. The UG can be improved by allowing the graphs to move beyond the point of origin in both directions. The UG can be used in any of the 2 positions for data entry, collapsed or retracted. You can input a shape into the graph while it is in the retracted position then collapse it to reveal the polytope, or vice versa. I have taken a close observation of many of the measurable parameters associated with the UG; w, x, y, and z axises and the distance each graph moves along these axial lines; the relative size of the polytope in comparison to the original inputted volume; The 4D polytope can be inputted and retracted to reveal the 5D, the 5th inputted to reveal the 6D so on and so forth to infinity. Multiple points, form a line; Multiple lines form a plane; Multiple planes form a volume; Multiple volumes form a hypervolume. At the very beginning of my scientific endeavors, this statement of fact was my only lesson on the fourth spatial dimension and it lead me directly to this discovery. Personal Statement I have noticed that the Universal Grid is pregnant with an infinite storehouse of potential data. I believe that this "key" will unlock the unknown higher dimensions of reality and inaugurate the next age of science. As the creator/custodian of the UG, I deliver this graph to the scientific community with hopes that the ensuing discoveries will be used to make our world a better place. Upon my completion of the initial discovery, a small voice within my being compelled me to write on the folder in which the discovery was contained a phrase that I wish to be accompanied with this graph wherever it shall be duplicated... "Use this for the benefit and well-being of all mankind." Please scrutinize this information. Questions, comments, and reactions are invited and appreciated.

The Last Days of Living in a 3-dimensional Universe I write this speech on the last day of living in a 3d world. Tomorrow, I will post the proof of a fourth spatial dimension in the form of a science rap video experiment. The video/written report will introduce a 4D calculator I named the Universal Grid. It will be an upgrade to the Cartesian 3-space graph which will allow for hyper-dimensional graphing and visualization. It's been almost 7 years since I've made the discovery, and as a layman, I have no other avenue whereas I can publish this historical discovery. So I come to the sites where scientific minds casually meet and in your hands I leave this information. As this information goes viral, I advise all to use the Universal Grid to solve all of the remaining mysteries of science. The Grand Unified Theory will be close behind this discovery and will go to the one ready to document and interpret the abilities of this graph. The critics of this graph will be few, but to those that oppose it, for them, they will lose all credibility in their discipline. The reasons one would reject this discovery shall be deeply associated with denial. This discovery will/may be embarrassing to the scientific community because it will uncover many erroneous theories accepted as fact that has lead the scientific world astray. At first glance a scientific mind will be able to see the true meaning of "quantum" and and will understand "relativity" at first sight. The mystery of the tetrahedral bond in chemistry will be explained, group theorists will be overjoyed, physicists and philosophers will be confounded by the fact that a layperson has accomplished this. Today I am a quack, tomorrow I will be considered to be one of the greatest minds to ever live. May this discovery reform science forever, and may the scientific community form a committee to investigate and interpret the possible significance of layman contributions to scientific discovery. Reply if you must, but be careful, for within the next 24 hours or so you will have to give an account of your words of ridicule and/or disbelif, if any. Enjoy your last hours of this age of 3D science - An age that entertained the idea of impossibility.

I'm just glad to see people getting along and sharing ideas on a post without cutting eachother down. As far as evolution and creation, and the supporting evidence, I believe there is much evidence supporting creation. There is much evidence concerning ufos but we discard these facts in a degenerate form of group think. As humans I think we underestimate our tendency to be mislead and we adopt another person's ideas and say they are our own. Take the mission statement of the Enlightenment from wiki.... Notice how the free thinkers of today adopt this as if it sprang directly from their own mind when in fact it is the PERSONAL ideas of another- evidence of group think, don't cha think? Also the former quote about tutalege Descartes wrote fathered the Enlightenment yet the latter quote by Outram is fundamentally different. The first quote is concerned with individuals personal interactions, one being free of another's guidance. While the second detests religion as a whole as if every religionist is in some way in error while glorifying science over faith and revelation. All I'm saying is beware of group think. So the questions I have are: Where did the dna of the first living thing on earth come from? How did it have within it the potential of all that you see here, including the greatness of our civilization? Did love, courage, beauty, and all of the immeasurable facts of existence also have it's origin in this single-cell organism as well? Evolution it's not a fact until a scientist can bring life from lifeless matter in the same way they claim it took place on that faithful day billions of years ago. Though evolution is apparent because of the evidence, but without giving a concise cause of the event while considering it the cause of an emotional existence may prove to be erroneous as well as disastrous. Haste makes waste. Intelligent Design - Message from the designers Paper 58 - Life establishment on Earth These links are way outside of accepted ideas, but cannot be disproven. Therefore can be considered evidence that needs to be reviewed for authenticity. Which can only be done by reason, not science.

So is it a possibility that we were created by a advanced civilization? There is much evidence supporting this idea. Everything that exist cannot be proven by hard physical evidence. For example, Love cannot be proven to exist, but I am sure you can agree that it does.

The Spatial 4th Dimesion is coming soon. An unschooled black layman physicist such as myself shall confound you very shortly. I speak confidently because the utter simplicity of this discovery will reveal that in all of your discipline, you have failed to see that which was most evident- I speak about both the existence of a God and of the 4th spatial dimension. How could this have happened? Concerning the aforementioned former, I can see how; but the latter, I am honestly bewildered. Be patient, you will soon have the chance to challenge my claims. Without a doubt I believe that you are at the very cusp of the age of scientific enlightenment, and spiritual enlightenment shall follow close behind.

I believe all of your points are opinions. I feel you and this modern world of science are like the latest and most advanced VCR to ever be created. The cheapest most simple DVD can out perform you. You are confident, but the whole of your personality was made evident as you dissected a idea. If you were sincere in your initial reply, then I encourage you to work on your ability to hold a regular conversation. Let start again. Do you think that our descendants will ever be able to create humans?

The Dreamer - Ghettochild "The 4th Spatial Dimension: A Rap Theory" I will release next week on youtube will be a remix of this song/video "The Dreamer" Stay tuned... <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PKyuWtVe1X8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The atheist death bed experience, near death experiences, your spontaneous first ever dna code that sprang from nothing, Christian spontaneous healings, hospital statistics of religious patients, thats enough evidence for me. As for my fourth spatial dimension theory, I will release it as a rap video on youtube some time early next week, I will release the written report on this site. Do me a favor, if it is proof, and I will wager anything that it is, make the video viral. If it is false, you decide what my punishment will be and I will obey. Lets make a bet...

I felt attacked because he/she seemed only to dissect my post for the purpose of discrediting it. It appears to be subtle species of trolling designed to entice a negative response, brainwash viewers, present fallacies as facts concerning things he/she admits they are not sure of, while the entire time maintaining a cunning innocence. Maybe this is why that poster never responded, mission accomplished. If you dont want people to post in religion, remove it. I came here to reveal the 4th spatial dimension, but with the zeitgeist of scientific forums leaning entirely to the status quo while systematically patronizing any and all that see otherwise, if our real life civil liberties was handled in this manner, we would be on our way to a dictatorship. I do understand you seek to maintain a quality environment, posting rules should evolve frequently. But I'm sure you knew that.As for the discovery, I have elected not to reveal this monumental breakthrough on this site or anyother namely because there is simply no where to post it.It's outside mainstream physic so its against rules. Your lost, not mine though id really wish for you to"read em and weep". Instead I will sell it to the highest bidder in the form of a software application. As for people, I see straight through them. I guess it is a God given ability.

Thank you for being specific, this contributes to a smoother governing process. I cede to your authority and apologize for the insult to the initial replier. Allow me to break once more the rule of staying on topic to express that I have found no rule concerning responding to moderator notes.

If I have broken one of the posting guidelines please make it known to me. My personal views are open-ended, if a persons says something profound enough to change my mind, there is a possibility that I won't believe in God any longer. I am not a religious person. Have you never heard a conversation started with a comment or statement? I hear them everyday. Furthermore, I believe the intention of my post was positive, non-egotistical, and enlightening in nature. Though your reply was indeed enlightening, it was neither of the former. Do as you see fit. What ever you do, do it for all mankind, not because you choose to present your personal opinion as a form license so that justice be served. I am not saying you are guilty of this. Justice unseasoned by mercy, to me, is not justice.

As humans we seek logical explanations of our origin and the origin of all material things. For if I showed a young child an apple and the child would ask me "where did it come from?" And I reply "nowhere, and no, it didn't come from a tree either" the child would search for the origin of that apple in an attempt to better understand it. The same is with logical minded adults concerning our origin. I understand that whatever is inside of me, that spark of life- that peice of divinity- that fragment of God, is also me. So it is futile to identify myself apart from IT. Consider a circle drawn by hand. The drafter must begin at a point and return to it in order to complete it. The part of the circle that was the point of origin if now lost within the circumference itself. So now many ask, "Where is God?" ...even after I found God I continued to ask, that is until I understood that the point of origin I sought would be forever lost within the circumference. To ease the pain of having no heritage and no legacy, I intelligently pondered the circle and logicly drew a point on the circumference and said "This is the origin" and called It God for a lack of a better definition. Was the point I scribed at all different from the original point of origin? No. I can now see the nature and the course of the original point of origin. I know it need not be highlighted for the circle to be complete, if anything, it makes the circle seem broken and divided. But it allows the seeker of the point of origin to be satisfied, and to find what the seeker sought. "Search and you shall find."

Very well moderator. However when the replier stated and I quote... "You do your descendants an disservice" is this not a personal comment? When logical creative expressions are targeted in a rhetorical way, communication of valid ideas may be smeared because the human mind tends to resonate with ego before logic. Meaning it's not what the person says that usually matters to outside observers, but how they say it, who has the most confidence and uses eloquence in place of profoundness. An asian script says, "True words aren't eloquent, and eloquent words aren't true." Moderator, if you please, be specific as to what personal comments I made and since this reply as well as the previous ones also contain personal comments, please clarify the difference between acceptable personal comments and those which are not and I will humbly cede to your authority. Please excuse my inability to use the proper quotation tags, I am on my Samsung Galaxy Prevail by Boost Mobile and the full site glitches my phone when trying to place certain features in a post.

You are missing the logical story, you must have thick borders and seldom dream at night. Treatment- say one prayer and email me in the morning. My post in one sentence: One day we will create humans, maybe we were created by humans too. Google "Rex Research- Suppressed and dormant technology". Either you are a troll for the status quo, or not well read. Peace out & holla back!

There is no way for me to prove you how all of this came to be but let Us look into the future to see if we can't see for ourselves how we came to be. After all, a clock always returns to 12 so wherever the end is there you will also find the beginning. Mankind is progressing very rapidly in the direction of technology. Even 10 years ago we were growing human hearts in jars of proteins with electric diodes connected to them, we have mapped the human genome codes and you gotta know there is an abundance of technology being concealed from us. So in 50 years where will we be? Creating humans from scratch? Sure they are doing that already with cloning. So what about in 500 years, or 1000?! Well I know you get where I am going with this but let me talk about our planetary spiritual advancement 50-2000 years from now. We have risen from the dark ages and now one day there will be peace on earth and we will look back on our dark history as a lesson we had to learn before we got to this beautiful world. Our great-great-great grandchildren will most likely be born in a utopian paradise of unimaginable beauty and mindblowing technology and they will be oblivious to the unimaginable turmoil and pain that was the umbillical cord to their legacy. So how will they learn? Technology coupled with Love and labor will undoubtedly compell them to create a planet, and place upon this world life, then watch it grow and guide it with the lessons from their history with hopes that one day they too will of themselves grow to be a perfect place. Such is the history of Our world... "Let Us make man in Our image and in Our likeness."

Hi My name is Mike Infinity. I am a layman inventor. I like to call the science I engage in 'philosophysics'. I believe the Wright brothers were philosophysicists, they used wisdom and applied it to physical reality. I come to this site to reveal some of my discoveries, after reading the posts in speculations by pinned, I am enthused to see how my findings will be taken. Being a layman poster, you all are my peers. Well either you all or a bunch of rappers and thugs are my peers and I dont think they are very interested in the 4th spatial dimension as I am. I am seeking an 'online peer review' ,if you will. Lol, since I am not qualified to even be heard by professionals I come to the online communities for a peer review. Later this week I will introduce the 4th spatial dimension graph I call the Universal Grid, and since it's the year 2012, who knows, maybe I will make history this week! I will most likey make the initial presentation in Mathematics or Physics and see if it passes the scrutiny of the admin or will it be moved to the trash can. Keeping with the process of a peer review, I will post the same report to multiple science forums and a video presentation to youtube. I understand how many of you feel about quacks, religious fanatics, psudeo-scientists, and fools who think that they can overturn the science world. I dont want to fall in any of those catagories, but if I must, I will. In any case I am thrilled to be here on this very active forum. It is very impressive to say the least. Talk soon!