ACG52

You haven't demonstrated in any way that there is anything beyond the beginning of the universe, In fact, by definition, there can't be. So you're simply applying your own unfounded beliefs, based upon your limited senses and experiences with a very small subset of reality.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Nonsense. Photons are emitted randomly all the time. No, this is Irrational post, which happens too, too frequently.

I have never seen a relativity denier who actually knew anything at all about relativity. Nor have I ever seen one who could actually articulate any problem with relativity. They don't even argue it, they just make pronouncements out of ignorance and an total inability to understand. After all, if they can't get it, it MUST be wrong.

Nonsense which certainly doesn't belong in the physics section.

Just another relativity denier, who knows nothing about what he says. Just your standard crank word salad. SR is completely mathematically consistent, and has been experimentally verified in a thousand ways for over a hundred years, not to mention the fact that it is applied to technology on a daily basis. If SR didn't work, neither would GPS, your computer, or the accelerators at CERN.

More youtube nonsense. Relativity is entirely self-consistent, and experimentally and operationally verified for over a 100 years. The only ones who question relativity are those who simply don't know anything about it. And of course, those cranks looking for some measure of fame for 'thinking outside the box', when they don't know what the box contains in the first place.

Yes, much. In this case, you missed the words "other frames see " You really don't have the faintest idea what Relativity is about or how it works, do you?

The phrase as used by Holye was meant to be disparaging, but instead it caught on and became the popular description.

OTOH, who on earth would want to read them? A compendium of bad writing and bad thinking?

PLEASE YES.

This belongs in a religion forum, not in speculations, which is supposed to have at least a passing reference to science, and not empty, ignorant personal preaching.

The speculation forum does not mean meaningless bullshit and ignorant hand waving. Your 'razor messages responses'? You haven't posted a single correct sentence since you started your nonsense.

Why is this still going on? This is just Zorro denying well understood fusion reactions and claiming that it's a mystery. He provides no evidence or support other than vague hand waving and conspiracy shrouded statements. He has stated that he doesn't understand the reactions, yet he keeps making pontifical statements regarding them. Close the thread.

Incorrect. The sun is too small and cool for fusion above hydrogen to helium to take place.

But dark matter does not interact with light, except gravitationally.

None of this makes any sense at all. This thread doesn't seem to qualify for the speculations, as there are no answers to any questions asked, and nothing supporting the 'models' except gibberish.

So the answer is no. Your model is nonsense. It can't make any predictions regarding the real world.

Let's ask again, simply. Maybe it's a language problem. Can any of your 'models, whatever number you want to give it, calculate the altitude needed for a geosynchronous orbit? (Do you know what a geosynchronous orbit is?)

Because it's not a method.

I don't think so MigL. voiding wind shows a steady and consistent level of total ignorance. I think it would be difficult to maintain that posture for that long.

I can't understand why swansont allows, even encourages this to continue.

If your 'model' cannot answer questions about the physical world, it's a useless bunch of words.

So the answer is no, you can't.

There is currently no evidence in support of god.