ACG52

Given that we have an entire civilization built around electricity and the movement of electrons, including the computer you're asking the question on, your question is really ludicrous.

That's the most badly faked piece of garbage I've ever seen.

Does saying 'Jesus Christ, get him off of me' count as a religious utterance?

Thus showing that theists are 40 times more likely to end up in prison than atheists.

This is total nonsense. It's word salad which was left out too long and has turned to sludge. It's not right, it's not even wrong.

The length of the recordings, as measured by the receiving craft will be the same. The wavelength of the recordings will be different, but the same light as measured in reality by the receiving craft will travel at the same speed.

But we know that isn't so. GPS must compensate for time dilation due to both relative motion and position in the gravity field. If it didn't, you'd be driving off a cliff. Additionally, there is the case of relativistic muons. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/muon.html Your hypothesis contradicts experiment and observation, and so, is doomed to end up with a whole bunch of others on the trash heap of science.

So you don't really know anything about what you are criticizing.

If the place you get off the plane is different than the place you got on the plane, you may safely assume you have traveled.

Space is mainly empty. It hasn't crashed because it hasn't run into anything. They are not going along with gravity, they're moving against the solar system's overall gravitational field.

From a glass blower. Glass blowing is a very old craft.

I was referring to the Shirley MacLaine woo.

This confirms it as total nonsense.

Debate and discussion is what this site is about. Furthermore, as you are posting in Astronomy and Cosmology, it should bear some relationship to Astronomy and Cosmology. If you're trying to make some philosophical point, it should be placed there. In either case, some relationship to science would be nice.

To borrow another quote from you, "It makes no sense whats so ever to me." I really can't see how you could possible draw this analogy.

The first will show a different time. The second I'm not sure about. The north pole has a higher gravitational field than the equator, but the radial speed at the equator is higher than at the pole. I'm guessing that they would cancel each other out, and the clocks would show the same time, but only calculation could confirm that.

Krash, neither one of those videos support your statements. They show matter streaming into an accretion disk, not light.

No, the geodesic is bent into the BH, not around it. Light will enter the EH, and that's the last the universe will see of it.

It would help if there was some actual knowledge behind the 'original thought' . Otherwise it's empty of any content. ' Original thought' is a favorite phrase of cranks.

This doesn't belong in speculations. There is nothing which in any way supports this nonsense.

Because they don't exist.

More than a little grandiose ego coupled with ignorance. Odd how they always seem to go together.

Theory says they don't, and to the best accuracy of our measurements they don't.

Because it would establish a single consistent frame of reference across all inertial frames. No. Massless particles can ONLY travel at c.

A photon is not a valid frame of reference, because the speed of the photon is invariant in every frame of reference, so you can't use a photon as any kind of point of view. If you could, you'd be establishing an absolute, preferred frame of reference, which Relativity tells us doesn't exist.