ACG52

Certainly it matter. The x-rays are generated OUTSIDE the Black Hole, the are not expelled from it. Nothing leaves a Black Hole.

No they're not. They are generated by the heating of the accretion disk surrounding the event horizon. I hope you're not serious about this.

One of the problems you may encounter is that personal information about the subjects is studies is usually missing.

Is there an appropriate word for this except nonsense?

Then you don't know what science is.

This is a science discussion site, not a blog for you to post your homework on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia The eruption on the top right looks like a swan.

Then you're wrong, and your hypothesis is wrong. The prediction of your hypothesis was false. It's not YOUR BELIEF that matters, it's what actually is. You're attributing your stupidity to the hypothesis. If your hypothesis was that the star contains helium, and you read the spectrograph and can't tell helium from neon because of your ignorance, that doesn't mean the hypothesis was wrong.

Nothing Mike posts is anti-science, nor does he appear to question accepted theory, it's just it doesn't seem to have much to do with science.

If a hypothesis gives correct predictions, the hypothesis is correct.

The moderator appears to like Mike, and will let him post whatever comes into his head. None of it, in any of his threads, seems to have anything to do with science, but hey,

In other words, nothing.

Getting a result from what? (a simple 'my researches' is not an answer)

The oldest electromagnetic radiation we can see is the CMBR, and there is no evidence that the photons comprising it travel any slower than the current speed of light.

Your numbers are way off, but the principle is there.

Pretty much. It also depends on relative motion. All time is relative. But then, all space is relative too. As to what is time, I like John Wheeler's definition. "Time is what keeps everything from happening at once".

The difference is not due to relative velocity so much as it is their position in the gravitational field. Their time is relatively faster, due to the lower gravitational field. What physically happens to the atoms is the same as what happens on earth, just at a different relative rate.

No, that opens the new tab, but leaves it in the background. You still have to click on the tab to bring it forward. BUT, I've found the answer. There's a chrome add-in called 'bring tabs to the front' which is free and works. Mods, feel free to close this thread. Thanks.

The flow will stop when all the carbon dioxide has bubbled out of the beer. Try the experiment with a stale, flat beer, and it won't work.

I've just started using Chrome, and I like it considerably better than IE8. But there's one thing I can do in IE which I haven't been able to figure out in Chrome. When I click on a link using the middle mouse button, I open the link in a new tab. In IE, there's a setting which always moves the new tab to the foreground, making it active. I can't find the same in Chrome. The link opens in the new tab, but the current tab always stays as the active one, making me click on the second tab. Now, it may simply not be possible to do that in Chrome, but does anyone have any ideas? I have taken a look at everything in settings, but no luck.

If you're going to be playing around with potentially explosive materials, you'd be better off in the attic than the basement. That way, you'd only blow the roof off your house instead of blowing up the whole thing.

That's all right. You've already told us that your parents are letting you use the basement for a lab, and given the level of knowledge on various subjects you've demonstrated, I'd conjecture that you're still in High School.

This is complete nonsense. How old are you?

Twenty-three words more than that nonsense you posted deserves. One word of four letters would have been enough.