ACG52

If the idea is presented in a rigourous, rational, formalized manner, then it would merit more consideration than a cranks hand-waving posts on a internet site. Just sayin...

Well first off, gravity falls off as the square of distance, so it not all that high. When planets formed, they had angular momentum, which expressed itself in their orbits. So they keep going round and round (or eliptical and eliptical).

No, because dark energy is negative, producing a negative pressure, which is expansive. What measurements? What lack of expansion? Oh, the irony is just too obvious.

Yup, that was it. It was set on new since my last visit,

I'm using 'view new content', I go to the bottom of the page and mark all as read. This takes me back to the Forum page. So far, so good. When I now click on view new content, shouldn't it say no new content found? What it does is list the same new content page as before, with the new post indicators blank.

The word is 'hypothesis'. You might want to recheck your definitions.

But most stars don't explode. Take the sun for example. In another 5 billion years or so, the sun will expand out past the orbit of mars, becoming a red giant. It will remain a red giant for a relatively short time, and then contract and settle down for the rest of time as a gradually dimmer dwarf star. Only the most massive of stars explode.

Since the lifetime of stars typically runs into the billions of years, supernovas are fairly rare events. Most stars do not explode when they reach the end of their lifetimes, only the largest do.

I agree with zapatos. Having the most recent post displayed first makes responding easier.

When I clicked on the reply box, the simley is in the top row.

Yup, that's working.

Can't load the aboutme tab in profile.

Can you see my warning points?

Ah, never knew that. But I don't really pay much attention to the rep. If it shows 0 under received, that would mean a conterbalancing neg or pos, as the case may be, correct? By all means, let's go public.

How would the public system work? Would the names of all the users voting show up in the profile? That could be a lot of names to list. Or would each post have a banner at the bottom saying 'member1, member2 likes (or dislikes) this post'

Oh good. I always like being on the bleeding edge of technology.

Nope, the smaller the BH, the higher the temp and the faster it dissapates.

It's unlikely, but I suppose possible. But again, the smaller the hole, the faster it dissapates.

If they originally existed, they have long since dissipated due to Hawking radiation. The smaller the BH the higher the 'temperature' and the more rapidly it dissippates.

First, K is not unitless, the unit is seconds. You said so right there Second, velocity is already defined as distance/time. That's what your 'tachys' is. So in saying that a meter is tachys * seconds, you're simply taking the derivative factor and reducing it to the fundamental factors, i.e. distance and time

I've noticed that when posters defend their ideas by putting the word scientific in CAPS, there's not much to defend. Another tip off is being 'full of math'.

Velocity is not a fundamental quantity. It's a derivative of time and distance.

Both.

Can you ask him for the name of his dealer? He's got some good weed.

These drawings are meaningless.